Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, November 09, 2006
Cal  Thomas :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Democrat Counterrevolution
by Cal Thomas
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


In the end, the Republican "revolution" ran out of gas and out of vision. Too many congressional Republicans appeared to care more about maintaining power than using power to implement an agenda, which they also abandoned.

Republicans reverted to fear tactics about Democrats raising taxes and "cutting and running" from Iraq. Democrats probably will try to raise taxes (they call it "pay as you go") and introduce resolutions to withdraw from Iraq under cover of a "plan" that has little to do with victory. Investigations of the administration will be labeled "oversight," and headed by the most liberal members of the House.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), a probable 2008 GOP presidential candidate, said on NBC Tuesday night that too many congressional Republicans had not been "careful stewards of taxpayer dollars," nor had they "adhered to conservative principles." He specifically mentioned such spending boondoggles as Alaska's "bridge to nowhere," numerous earmarks, pork barrel spending and scandals. When Republicans behave like Democrats, they lose. Why should people settle for counterfeits when they can have the genuine article?

Republicans can take some solace that President Bush might veto much of the Democrats' stealth agenda, which they hope he will do. Their objective is to win the White House in 2008 and they will turn the tables on the president if he vetoes their agenda, calling him an "obstructionist," a label he has tried to pin on them. The president would be wise to build relationships, at least with the conservative and more moderate Democrats, in hopes of isolating the liberals.

Republicans lost a significant part of their base in this election. Exit polls revealed nearly one-third of white evangelical Christians voted for Democrats, mostly because of perceived corruption in the GOP. They will continue to exercise influence within the Republican Party, but their days of veto power over policy and candidates may be over.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said he wants to cooperate with Republicans and search for common ground. Voters, who have been sickened (again) by corrosive and negative campaign ads, would appreciate that. But Dean has called Republicans "evil," "corrupt" and "brain-dead." That's not the kind of language that is likely to produce conciliation and comity.

One top House Democrat, who asked to remain anonymous until he sees whether his strategy will work, told me he will ask John Boehner, the current Republican majority leader, for permission to address the GOP caucus. The purpose, he says, would be to build a new relationship and reduce inter-party acrimony. Most people would probably wish him well if it results in progress that would benefit the country.

There are serious issues that must be addressed and resolved. Nice talk won't replace important philosophical differences and differing objectives. Most Americans may be tired of the Iraq war, but our enemies are not tired of it. If the United States pulls out of Iraq before Iraqis are trained and equipped to stand on their own against the insurgent terrorists, the terrorists will inherit a base and export terror around the world, including to the United States. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Cal Thomas is co-author (with Bob Beckel) of the forthcoming book, "Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That is Destroying America".
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Cal Thomas' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Paul
The Social Security (tax) is withheld from workers' paychecks, along with income tax, etc. before they ever receive their "net" salary. We can view it as a government program to insure that those who retire can rely on a monthly income. (Others, for various reasons, draw from the pot, also).

OR, we can call it a tool of socialism.

As it is set up now, everyone who meets the criteria is entitled to the benefits, even if they are wealthy. I don't agree that, under the present system, only those who end up with no money in their "old age" deserve get the fruits of everyone's labor. The wealthy pay into it, they're entitled to the benefits.

Why? Because some folks are sensible, careful about how they spend their dollars...they make sure some of that income gets invested for the day when they will no longer be earning.

But what about those who have to "have it all"? Those who spend every dime they make and use that magical credit card to buy even more! They live with debts they cannot pay off.

I belong to the thrifty set (obviously), and I don't want to support those who lived high and squandered their money. They are in a whole different category from anyone, who through no fault of his/her own, just can't survive without help.

It stinks.......
I still don't trust that mealy-mouthed lair we have for a President who is STILL occupying the White House.

And, the timing of the Rumsfeld "firing" stinks to high heaven.

That is, waiting until AFTER the election to do so (when doing so BEFORE the election might well have kept the Republicans in one or both houses of Congress in power) simply leads me to believe that Bush and his Cabal are still hard at work trying to hold onto their OWN power. And it would seem they are now willing to do ANYTHING…including sacrificing their own members of Congress…to do it.

When Bush announced Rumsfeld's departure (and, in the process, conceded that he had once again LIED to all of us about his intentions in the process) I immediately thought of all the young men and women who have died in Iraq (not to mention the hundreds of thousands of Iraqui civilians) for absolutely NO OTHER REASON but to keep this crowd firmly in power.

And, while they may have lost a political "battle" by the Democrats now taking over both houses of Congress, my hunch is that Bush and his neocon handlers have yet to concede defeat in their ongoing political "war" to rule the planet...by force.

Could Bush's grand strategy have been little more than throwing his Republican cohorts in the Congress to the wolves NOW so as to get the Democrats in power in time to let THEM screw things up for 2008? Then, he and his neocon handlers could once again go after the "big prize" …keeping another one of "their own" in the White House bully pulpit?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.