Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Making entitlements SAFE-er
By Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


In any policy battle, it helps to have allies. So it’s good that AARP seems finally ready to help press for reform of entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

AARP’s shift can be seen in its latest TV ad, “Future Champions.” It shows children stressing the need to “find real long-term solutions to some of America’s most pressing issues -- health care and long-term financial security.”

The ad is misleading in some ways. Speaking about entitlements, one boy asks, “Will we keep those promises?” when, of course, this child has made no promises. In fact, the big three entitlement programs are promises made by older generations -- to give themselves benefits that younger workers will have to pay for through ever-rising payroll taxes.

But the overall message of the ad is that we need to make some big changes to fix entitlements. That’s a refreshing change from two years ago. Back then, when President Bush was urging the creation of individual retirement accounts within Social Security, AARP’s ads insisted, “If you had a problem with the kitchen sink, you wouldn’t tear down the entire house,” hinting that entitlement problems weren’t all that bad.

But the organization now seems to understand that the country’s on the verge of a fiscal catastrophe.

The Congressional Budget Office predicts that spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will soar from just over 8 percent of GDP today to almost 19 percent in 2050, when the cute children in today’s TV ads will be middle-aged parents. Their bill will be gigantic: $38 trillion to pay for the Social Security and Medicare benefits their parents have promised themselves -- but not arranged to pay for. Add in the national debt and other entitlements, and it works out to $440,000 for every household in the U.S. today -- enough to buy each of those families a new home. Or two.

So how can we fix things? Well, as we learned in the debate over Social Security, we can’t simply take on one problem at a time. If we attempt to reform just one of the big programs, some group will always fight for the status quo. We need to fix all three at once.

Also, we need to give lawmakers some cover. To accomplish that, Congress should form a commission such as the one Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., proposed last year. Wolf would label it “SAFE,” for “Securing America’s Future Economy.” It would have 16 voting members, including at least four members of Congress, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and the secretary of the Treasury.

The commission would be bipartisan and have one year to develop plans to: Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: The Public Trough and Ponzi
Hitting the taxpayer up to provide funds for the 'needy' INDIVIDUAL was probably never considered as 'thinkable' when the Constitution was presented for ratification. It most assuredly was not considered 'Constitutional' in the 1830's, or else the "It's not ours to give" speech would be just a joke when US Representative David Crockett made that speech.
http://patriotpost.us/histdocs/crockett_not_yours_to_give.asp

Crockett related a conversation with one Horatio Bunce. Mr. Bunce reportedly said in part, "when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it and no security for the people."

That statement alone should have been a warning that politicians and even judges and Justices on the highest Court in the United States should look upon the Constitution as a firm contract determined by what 'the People' understood and currently understand it to mean -- as written and intended.

I believe that Mr. Bunce could have said 'when GOVERNMENT once begins to stretch its power", there is no limit to it and no security for the people (the citizens of the United States).

'Government' HAS stretched its power to, or well beyond, the very boundaries of the tyranny that was so detested by the authors of the Declaration of Independence. Not only has taken to give away, but has loaded the American citizen with a debt that is so monstrous as to defy belief in order to provide funds for giveaway programs.

I cannot imagine any responsible or sane person willing to go deeply into debt to give away the proceeds of debt, particularly if their own family would have to suffer, and most assuredly not if they were already struggling.

Some may say that not all of the 'public debt' (or public disgrace) went to giveaway programs, and possibly that is true but when the Nation is ALREADY deeply in debt and more giveaways are added, where is that money coming from? Even the current interest on the 'debt' is beyond the total debt 50 or so years ago.

Who are the deceivers who would make us believe that it is 'responsible' to give away money we don't have? Quite clearly, those who profit from getting it are in favor of getting it.

OLD MAN compared this mess to a Ponzi scheme, and rightly so because people are duped into believing that such schemes are 'sound investments' when in truth they are mathematically unsustainable after just a few 'iterations'. However, 'government' has two things going for it that the Ponzi schemers do not have. When 'government' operates them, they are LEGAL and 'government' can FORCE people to 'participate'.

We have, by and large, been suckered into believing that government can give us something of greater value than the price we are forced to pay because we have been led to believe that 'someone else' will make up the difference. We seem surprised, even outraged, when we discover that WE are that 'someone else' and finally have to acknowledge that we have been suckered.

I, personally, do not vote for any candidate who indicates a willingness to vote for ANY giveaway -- either for a 'new' one or for sustaining an old one because I do not believe I 'owe' anyone except my progeny (within limits I set myself). I give to causes and even to people if I feel I can afford such charity.

Once again, alluding to Mr. Bunce, 'government' may be relieving some but at the same time may be taking from thousands who are more needy than the recipients of government 'generosity'.


Totalization Treaty with Mexico

Not factored in is the Totalization Treaty with Mexico already negotiated. This will make illegal aliens eligible for SS (once they get legal status, that's why guestworker/amnesty will be passed first before W. signs it) in just 6 quarters or 18 months(combined Mexican or U.S., even if illegal at the time worked) for the same benefits you and I had to work 40 quarters or 10 years to qualify for. This will bankrupt Social Security much sooner than anyone is counting on.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.