Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
To Catch a Leaf
By Jacob Sullum
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


In 2001, shortly before Michael Bloomberg became a candidate for mayor of New York, an interviewer asked him if he'd ever smoked marijuana. "You bet I did," he said, "and I enjoyed it."

Yet as mayor, Bloomberg has presided over what a recent report from the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) calls a "marijuana arrest crusade," seeking to punish pot smokers for an activity he enjoyed with impunity. This little-noticed crackdown, which began under Rudy Giuliani, has disproportionately affected young black and Hispanic men, engendering resentment, distrust of the police and disrespect for the law.

While marijuana arrests have risen between two- and three-fold nationwide since 1990, the increase in New York has been much more dramatic. "From 1997 to 2006," sociologist Harry Levine and drug policy activist Deborah Small note in the NYCLU report, "the New York City Police Department arrested and jailed more than 353,000 people simply for possessing small amounts of marijuana. This was 11 times more marijuana arrests than in the previous decade."

Based on their analysis of arrest data and their interviews with police, arrestees and public defenders, Levine and Small conclude that the pot busts are largely a byproduct of the NYPD's aggressive "stop and frisk" tactics. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that police may briefly detain people they suspect of involvement in criminal activity and, as a precautionary measure, pat them down for weapons. Taking advantage of this Fourth Amendment loophole, New York City police stopped and frisked people more than half a million times in 2006.

In the vast majority of cases, these stops do not result in arrests. But sometimes people are carrying small amounts of marijuana. Since police cannot legally search for drugs without probable cause, Levine and Small found, they typically trick or intimidate people into revealing their pot, at which point they can be arrested.

Such trickery not only exposes the contraband; it changes the nature of the offense. Under state law merely possessing a small amount of marijuana (up to 25 grams, about seven-eighths of an ounce) is a citable offense similar to a traffic violation. But having marijuana "in public view" is a misdemeanor.

The NYPD makes about 35,000 such arrests each year. Although marijuana possession is either the only or the most serious charge in these cases, the arrestees are nevertheless handcuffed and taken to a police station, where they are fingerprinted and photographed, and they usually spend a night in jail, an uncomfortable, degrading and often frightening experience. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine and a contributing columnist on Townhall.com.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Jacob Sullum's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Institutional Racism
The War on Drugs is the only thing left that can still be considered "institutional racism." Anybody still harboring ambitions of being the Grand Dragon of the KKK need look no further than joining the police force and "collaring" the kinds of people he doesn't like.

It's surprising the Black Congressional Caucus and the Rev's Jackson, Sharpton, et al, aren't leading the charge to put an end to *this* asinine War. More people are killed each *year* in the War on Drugs than in the *entire* war in Iraq.

It's the only thing left that a "victicrat" (to use a Larry Elder term) can justifiably point to and blame as an external cause to his problems.

Sure, it's easy to go the Nancy Reagan route and shout, "Just Say No." But for the ones who don't, for whatever reason, they DON'T deserve this kind of unfair treatment.

It's high time to "Just Say No" to the War on Drugs.

I thought that this was part
of the NYC "zero tolerance" campaign that is credited with reducing crime in NYC.

The other problem I have with this column is the term "loophole" used in conjunction with the SCOTUS ruling with the implication that the conservative ruling was somehow bogus. This is a tactic most often used by the liberals. The SCOTUS ruled that a search could be made under the cover of a crime. In other words, WITH PROBABLE CAUSE, which has been the standard for decades.

In any case, all these drug laws should be removed, particularly the federal ones which are unconstituional.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.