Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Sometimes a Picture Is Worth Diddly
By Kathleen Parker
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


JIDDAH, Saudi Arabia -- There's no substitute for being there, as has been illustrated by the reaction to an image of Laura Bush's alleged abaya-wearing incident during her recent visit to the Middle East.

Unlike most who have commented, I was there -- one of three members of the American media invited to accompany Bush on her journey. The others were Greta Van Susteren of Fox News' "On the Record" and Robin Roberts of ABC's "Good Morning America."

The controversial photo shows Bush donning a black headscarf decorated with the iconic pink bows signifying breast cancer awareness. It was the only time Bush covered her head during the trip and the episode lasted perhaps a minute.

The scarf in question was a gift to Bush from a dozen Saudi women who shared their experiences fighting breast cancer with the first lady. The morning meeting was touching and intimate, the sort of bonding experience that opens hearts and minds in diplomatically useful ways.

Upon receiving the gift, Bush did what any decent, well-mannered person would do. She demonstrated her appreciation by placing the scarf on her head. In Saudi Arabia, it was a sweet, wordless gesture of friendship and mutual respect.

Yet to read and hear remarks over the past few days, you'd think Bush had organized a pilgrimage to the stoning fields. Remind me: When did rudeness work as a diplomatic strategy?

Not only were the facts concerning the scarf incorrectly stated in some cases, but in at least one instance, the alleged image was a retread. Sunday morning, when Chris Wallace interviewed Bush on Fox News, the cable program featured a photo of the first lady that the White House says was taken in 2005 at Israel's Western Wall.

On Monday, a column posted on The Jerusalem Post's Web site carried the headline, "Our World: Laura Bush's embrace of tyranny." Huh? Columnist Caroline Glick wrote that Bush's donning of the scarf and her visit in general were symbolically "deeply disturbing."

Glick's point, reiterated elsewhere throughout the blogosphere, was that Bush was effectively endorsing the subjugation of Saudi women by wearing the scarf.

Camel dust.

It's true, obviously, that Saudi women have few rights -- though they do own 40 percent of businesses and 70 percent of the nation's savings accounts, according to U.S. Ambassador Ford M. Fraker.

And while we might find Saudi Arabia's Wahhabi brand of Islam off-putting, insulting Saudi women isn't likely to tilt their sympathies our way. The women with whom we met didn't convey much urgency in shedding the abaya. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.

Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Much Ado About Headscarves
Thanks for standing up for honesty and fairness. I'm as ticked at the White House for President Bush's abandonment of Conservative principles as anybody. But, that's no reason to act like the other side with games of "gotcha!" and mislabeled photos. Mrs. Bush continues to be an American asset.

Mrs. Bush is a Lady
I realize that Generation Whine was brought up by Mothers whose idea of good behaviour was daning nekkid at Woodstock and sprawling on their backs for any guy who waved a dirty hand in their direction, but they would be much better advised to look to Mrs. Bush for an example of how to behave in society.

A gentleman who retired last year from the American Le Mans Series, James Weaver of Dyson Racing, came to Sebring one year wearing a team shirt in a rather sissy shade of lime and pink which occasioned merriment among the fans. He reported to those of us who inquired that it was a gift from his daughter, and thus good manners required he wear it at least once.

A lady in our part of the South who was complimented on some new addition to her wardrobe, when I was a girl, would say graciously, *You must wear it some time.* This was the equivalent of *Lets do lunch* of course, but it was manners.

So the fact that Mrs. Bush would try on a gift in the presence of the givers does not surprise me at all; nor would it surprise me if she had continued to wear it. I am sure that had she entered a Catholic church in the Sixties, she would have worn a chapel veil or hat although she is not Catholic.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!