Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, March 28, 2008
Bush's Africa Legacy
By Michael Steele
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


President Bush showed the world that it isn't words, but actions, that truly make a difference. Millions throughout Africa would agree.

Mr. Bush recently completed a historic visit to the African continent; a trip he described as "the most exciting, exhilarating, uplifting trip" of his presidency. During his visit, we saw pictures of the president dancing, celebrating and attending ceremonies with heads of state. But the real story is not about just this one trip; it is about the commitment the president made to Africa and what the United States has been quietly accomplishing throughout the continent over the past eight years under Mr. Bush's leadership.

While critics here at home, including many in the press, focused on attacking Mr. Bush at every turn, he steadfastly pushed for greater investments to help the families and businesses of Africa. It's the great untold story that has rarely made headlines here in America, but even so, it has truly changed the world for millions of Africans.

As Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete noted, for the people of his country and others across the African continent, Mr. Bush's "legacy will be that of saving hundreds of thousands of mothers' and children's lives from malaria, preventing new HIV infections and giving hope to those infected through care and treatment, and helping millions of young men and women get education." Perhaps most importantly, he adds, Mr. Bush leaves "the legacy of assisting African nations and people [in building] capacity for their own growth and development." Over the last seven years, the U.S. has committed $1.6 billion to trade capacity-building assistance to Sub-Saharan Africa. Moreover, Mr. Bush launched the Millennium Challenge Account as a new model to support governments that commit to ruling justly, investing in people and encouraging economic freedom. In May 2007, he announced the Africa Financial Sector Initiative, which will create seven new investment funds that will mobilize more than $1.6 billion through support of OPIC.

In the area of improving health care in Africa, the president's actions are already producing measurable results: nearly 1.5 million people are receiving life-saving antiretroviral medications, HIV infection from HIV-positive mothers has been prevented in more than 150,000 infants and 29 million children have been enrolled in schools, some for the first time in their lives. For Mr. Bush, that's just the beginning. On his recent trip, he announced plans to provide more than 5 million mosquito nets to Tanzanians, as well as a new investment to help eradicate certain tropical diseases.

So why did he do it? As singer-songwriter Bob Geldof pointed out, "There are no votes in helping the poor of Africa, but Bush did it anyway." It clearly wasn't about winning votes or political gain. It was not about fodder for stump speeches and empty promises of hope. Instead of being about catch phrases that simply ring hollow, the president's quiet efforts in Africa have been about action, about compassion and about results. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Michael Steele is a former Lieutenant Governor of Maryland.

Be the first to read Lt. Governor Steele's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

I've donated a lot of my hard-earned money, through my church, to help Africans - specifically, Kenyans. I give to help orphans of AIDS victims, to generate awareness of how AIDS is spread by risky behaviors, and to drill wells where clean water is otherwise difficult to find. My heart breaks for the people of Africa, who suffer the kind of poverty that even "poor" Americans can barely imagine.

The problem with President Bush's approach is that he is compassionate with other people's money. That's not to say he isn't also generous with his own money, but that doesn't excuse taking others' money by force (try not to pay your taxes and see what happens) and giving it to someone else, domestic or foreign. A much better approach would be for Bush to donate $X for African relief, then address the nation with a rare prime-time speech exhorting private citizens to follow his example.

And we all know that the private sector is much more efficient than the government.

My approach is the conservative one. Bush's is the so-called "compassionate conservative" one. That's just a euphemism for liberal Republican, big-gov't Republican, or middle-of-the-road/moderate.

After reading a few of Michael Steele's columns, I've suspected that he is in the Bush mold. Now I'm sure of it.

Subject: Bush in Africa
Mike Steele’s glowing assessment of Bush’s ‘African legacy’ makes some crucial omissions.

It is worth noting that one third of PEPFAR funds spent in Tanzania must go to abstinence programs. PEPFAR provides funds to faith-based initiatives that allow Christian fundamentalist organisations to combine evangelism with the provision of anti-retroviral drugs. The hostility of these organisations to prostitutes and homosexuals has had a damaging effect on AIDS prevention work. This aspect of PEPFAR has also been condemned by the Treatment Action Campaign, the largest HIV/AIDS organisation on the continent.

Bush is also attempting to discourage African countries from using cheaper generic anti-retroviral drugs by making it more difficult for these countries to override intellectual property rights, a right to which they are entitled in terms of WTO agreements to deal with national emergenies. It is well known that pharmaceutical companies were one of the main contributors to his election campaign.

US funding for African health programs is due to be reduced next year, and amazingly, despite the fact that tuberculosis has been identified as a security threat to the US, he has proposed cutting the funding for TB programs.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!