Without doubt the Federal appointee who was most effective dealing with
sex-trafficking was former Representative John R. Miller (R-WA).
President George W. Bush has sought to end sex slavery within the United
States and provide international leadership on the issue. Miller was
appointed Director of the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in
Persons for the U.S. State Department and became an Ambassador-at-large
on the issue of modern slavery. Miller elevated the fight to a high
priority in the Bush Administration.
Recently, Miller wrote an op-ed in The New York Times which suggested
that the effort to oppose sex slavery has met opposition in the
Department of Justice (DOJ). Miller also made a presentation to a group
with which I am involved. Upon hearing Miller's presentation I realized
that the situation is worse than he described in The New York Times.
After nurturing the 21st-Century abolitionist movement from 2002 to
2006, Miller believed that President Bush supported him despite
objection to his efforts from numerous Ambassadors who did not want
their host countries criticized. Miller stated that the President made
it clear that his work was important. While he did not win every battle,
he prevailed, often thanks to White House support.
One could imagine Miller's surprise when he learned that DOJ initiated a
campaign to oppose a new Congressional bill which would strengthen the
Federal Government's anti-trafficking efforts. In a 13-page letter, DOJ
blasted nearly every aspect of the proposed legislation. In its annual
report which rates how well countries are combating sex slavery, DOJ
does not want to consider whether governments put traffickers in jail,
nor does it want the Departments of Homeland Security and Health and
Human Services to streamline their efforts to help the victims of
sex-trafficking acquire visas and assistance. DOJ does not want to pool
data with the Departments of State, Homeland Security and Health and
Human Services on sex-trafficking and to devise prevention strategies.
DOJ opposes the creation of Presidential awards for groups leading the
struggle against this modern-day slavery. It is against a citizens' task
force to develop a pamphlet for victims. It does not want the State
Department to give the telephone numbers of American anti-trafficking
organizations to visa applicants at American Consulates worldwide.
Miller believes the vehement opposition by DOJ to this proposed
legislation goes far beyond the usual turf battle which usually rears
its ugly head in Washington, D.C. Miller states that DOJ opposes changes
which would expand its own authority to combat trafficking. For example:
Should they prosecute American tourists who create the demand for
sex-trafficking in foreign countries? Should Congress provide increased
penalties for Americans who sexually abuse children abroad? Should
American jurisdiction extend to Americans who traffic human beings
aboard? Should the Attorney General include information in his annual
report on his department's efforts to enforce anti-trafficking laws
against federal contractors and employees? No, it should not do any of
these.
Miller believes this letter is the product of the mostly male DOJ staff
working with the Erotic Service Providers Union and the American Civil
Liberties Union (ACLU). He does not believe the President saw or
approved the 13-page letter. In the House of Representatives there is a
Caucus on Human Trafficking, co-chaired by Representatives Carolyn
Maloney (D-NY) and Debbie Price (R-OH). They have been trying to
coordinate a meeting with the President but have been unsuccessful.
Regardless of one's opinion of President Bush, it is impossible to
dismiss his sincerity and determination on such issues. I am willing to
wager that this letter went to Capitol Hill without his approval. There
is time for President Bush to reverse this injustice.
|