Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Friday, May 09, 2008
Obama Forgot About "Bracket Creep"
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:43 AM
Writing in today's Wall Street Journal, Andrew Biggs points out a major flaw in Barack Obama's plan to return to the tax rates of the 1990s (pre Bush tax cuts):
"Tax revenues would skyrocket if the tax cuts expire, due to "bracket creep." Average incomes are higher today than in the 1990s, but income-tax brackets aren't adjusted for the growth of earnings. As a result, Americans will shift into higher tax brackets and pay a greater share of their incomes in taxes.

Going back to the tax rates of the 1990s doesn't mean that households will pay 1990s taxes. Because the tax brackets haven't risen along with incomes, average taxes would be significantly higher, and grow each year.

... So even if the tax cuts are made permanent, future Americans will pay a greater share of their incomes to the government than in the past. But for some in Washington, that's not enough."





FEATURES FEATURES

The Campbell Quiz

Posted by: John Campbell
5/16/2008

Nothing "False" About Bush Attack

Posted by: Michael Medved
5/15/2008

The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles

Posted by: Fred Thompson
5/15/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 3 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
Last updated 8 Minutes 22 Seconds Ago
Last updated 11 Minutes 14 Seconds Ago
Last updated 13 Minutes 3 Seconds Ago
Last updated 13 Minutes 19 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns Columns
Your Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
 January 2008
 December 2007
 November 2007
 October 2007
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007
 May 2007
 April 2007
 March 2007
 February 2007
 January 2007
 December 2006
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Christopher: Hyprocrisy at Its Finest
 Re: ProtectMarriage.com
  By K.G.
It's hard to run Conservative
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By blackjuju
This is just common sense
 Re: McCain Response: Conditions Required
  By Joe
shhhhh here comes god
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By mrbmrb
I see no one here addressing
 Re: ProtectMarriage.com
  By Brob
You are brilliant!
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By Sandy
Don't Freak Out--Fight Back
 Re: "Polar Bear Pushback" and ProtectMarriage.com
  By Joe
does anyone want to hazard a guess
 Re: Truth and Science
  By king
Cal Supreme Court Ruling
 Re: "Polar Bear Pushback" and ProtectMarriage.com
  By Dan
Fred Thompson and Townhall
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By none
Apology to Doc
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By Jude
earmarks with goals
 Re: The Campbell Quiz
  By Kimberly
I remember...
 Re: 'The Company Might As Well Call Themselves Slutbucks!'
  By Dread
Fred! Thanks for trying.
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By Aeroplane
Wedge issues get deep-sixed
 Re: "Polar Bear Pushback" and ProtectMarriage.com
  By Kimberly
Good bye Fred
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By Pasadena Phil
2012 TO LATE
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By Joy
I've heard enough
 Re: Fred Thompson Talks Appeasement, Obama, and Townhall Magazine
  By Pasadena Phil
Fred Thompson
 Re: The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
  By Reggie
ABSOLUTELY Correct, A86 !
 Re: ProtectMarriage.com
  By NeoConScum

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll