Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Friday, May 16, 2008
(Video) From the book, "STUPID Liberals ALWAYS do the same thing..."
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 10:23 PM
Personally I find it stunning that they never learn.

Whenever Bush makes a speech, even if he doesn't refer to them, name their names, say anything about them... they jump up and say, "I am NOT they way you describe me to be!!!!!!"

Have you ever noticed?

Like when the President uttered the words in the State of the Union referring to the fact that Iraq had sought uranium in AFRICA? Immediately that weekend Joe Wilson the mint julep queen goes on Andrea Mitchell, and starts talking about how the President was referring to his trip to NIGER. (Last I checked Africa is a wee bit bigger than Niger.)

Yesterday the President makes a comment that could have included most of Western Europe, ALL of Eastern Europe, and God only knows who else across the spectrum. He could have been referring to the Arab nations even neighboring Israel - the nation to whom he was speaking. He NEVER mentioned Barack Obama, The United States, or the Democratic Party... so what do American liberals do?

They blow their lids. Biden, Pelosi, Clinton, Obama, and Obama's nasty-faced campaign staffers ALL run out like spoiled brats screaming at television cameras, "HOW DARE HE TALK ABOUT US THAT WAY?"

They were indignant, insufferable, indiscreet, and very unintelligent in their presentations. Even television liberals - who sometimes (not often) still actually check the text of speeches - had drank the kool-aid, and then tried to say Bush HAD referred to Obama by citing his Press Secretary DENYING that he had referred to Obama. How the heck does that even work?

"Bush referred to Obama..."

"Where in his text did he refer to Obama?"

"No where he just was..."

"Sorry but the language of his speech doesn't refer to any person specifically..."

"Yeah but he was referring to Obama."

"No I don't believe he referred to anyone specifically."

"SEE YOU JUST DENIED IT - that PROVES he was referring to Obama..."

Then you add to that the Pelosi presser, the Clinton presser, and the nasty-face Obama campaign staffers all out there snarling - telling everyone how "beneath the dignity of the office" it was for Bush to attack Obama - on foreign soil. (To which he did not...)

And the foreign soil thing comes up... See - when the Dixie Chicks stand on stage somewhere and they actually NAME the President, and the United States, and actually, specifically refer to our foreign policy as being an embarrassment - that is the textbook definition of being unpatriotic. Now they all wanna say Bush did the same thing, but with no references to the United States, Barack Obama, the US' foreign policy - or anything even remotely resembling an attack on another U.S. Citizen, elected official, or even candidate.

Can SOMEONE PLEASE explain to me what the heck the liberals' problem is?

If you've got John Kerry, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Obama's nasty-face campaign staffers all out there gettin' all uppity about President Bush saying something - HE NEVER SAID - doesn't that bode poorly for their potential to handle an actual crisis someday?

I was on the road between DC and NYC last night listening to the debate on many of the news outlets... Mark Steyn actually said it best on Hannity and Colmes - but I have not yet been able to find the footage. But a close second had to be Newt's opening round with kool-aid drinker Alan Colmes... watch and learn people. Watch and learn... liberals are just thick-headed less than genius types and running circles around them gets really easy - when they make such bone-headed blunders...




FEATURES FEATURES

Charting McCain's Comeback ...

Posted by: Matt Lewis
8/20/2008

Winning Reagan's Way

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt
8/20/2008

Spending Addiction

Posted by: John Campbell
8/19/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 8 Minutes 38 Seconds Ago
Last updated 8 Minutes 53 Seconds Ago
Last updated 9 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
Last updated 11 Minutes 48 Seconds Ago
Last updated 19 Minutes 10 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns Columns
Your Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
 January 2008
 December 2007
 November 2007
 October 2007
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007
 May 2007
 April 2007
 March 2007
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

To win Iowa
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By Pro
DP
 Re: "Render Unto Caesar" and "Vote for Real Hope and Change" by Archbishop Charles Chaput
  By Cicero
QWEENMUM you're right it was PC. Sorry
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By Laura
and to add
 Re: Spiffing Up the Homeless
  By American Sweetheart
I understand that...
 Re: Spiffing Up the Homeless
  By American Sweetheart
OBAMA BIG OIL PUPPET
 Re: Fun With Photoshop
  By JimP
Veepstakes
 Re: Townhall's Republican Convention Coverage
  By Foamer
Oops! Forgot the site for the poll above
 Re: Trusting Government More than Themselves
  By Laura
Sad days
 Re: Hobson's Choice: Lieberman or Ridge?
  By raven
Here's Dubya's Big Lie
 Re: Hitchens: It's Time for Some Apologies on Iraq
  By Jelperman
Libs want to take "IN GOD WE TRUST"
 Re: Trusting Government More than Themselves
  By Laura
I think it's gonna be ROMNEY!
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By Shelby
dmac: Gunny's 1:28
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By K.G.
Shelby-- Dumond
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By Synthesizer
The third party delusion.
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By eddie too
What is possible now and then
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By Pro
McCain must step up
 Re: Winning Reagan's Way
  By Col Bat Guano
dmac: I See Huck a Little Differently...
 Re: Romney or Pawlenty on August 29
  By K.G.
Palin and Jindal
 Re: Townhall's Republican Convention Coverage
  By RASHUM
Katharina - you're partly right
 Re: Winning Reagan's Way
  By athingortwo

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall