Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Wednesday, May 07, 2008
Supersimbo Et Al
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:27 PM
A blog of the RagamuffinSoul community.

See also Chad Jarnigan. And NormalRockstar.  And Going To 11. And about a hundred other links thereon and around.

Randy has been stirring many pots.  He's a one-man manifesto.

Wandering around this sub-hubbed community underscores my belief that the Evangelical Manifesto is really not an idea for a time of exploding diversity.  When there was even informal hierarchy, manifestos might have influence.

But in a world full of influencers you have never heard of, connecting to other subcommunities you couldn't imagine --like church sound maestros!-- presuming to speak for them all is, well, at best over-confident. 

"Evangelical Manifestos" of the future will not have to be read, but will be evidenced by the changes they have brought about. They will not have to be announced, merely recognized.




Wednesday, May 07, 2008
Yet Another "Evangelical Manifesto"
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:29 AM
Between Two World's Justin Taylor summarizes it, but don't expect much beyond today's press release. 

Christians at work in or near the public square represent a vast spectrum from left to right, and an astonishing array of doctrines and creeds.  The effort to define for this incredibly large and diverse collection of believers a "manifesto" is to me an exercise in pride going before a snooze. 

Tell me the issue.  Then tell me your take based upon your understanding of the Gospel.  Then we can agree or disagree and perhaps reason together on where we part company.

But, please, don't tell me or imply to the public that you speak for evangelicals.  It simply isn't true and cannot be true.






Monday, May 05, 2008
Defending Jeremiah?
Posted by: Michael Medved at 10:17 AM

Amidst all the raging controversy, a few brave voices have come forward to defend Pastor Jeremiah Wright. They deserve more attention than they’ve received because they illustrate the pompous fatuity so typical of the religious left. 

For instance, within his own denomination, the Rantin’ Rev most certainly enjoys his supporters. Reverend Richard Wagner of Union Congregational Church, a United Church of Christ congregation in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, says the Pyrotechnic Pastor displays Biblical stature, and speaks “with the same passion and hyperbole as the Hebrew prophets.” The New York Times adds that “clergy members have cited Amos, who cursed all the nations, saving his harshest words for his own.” 

There are no end of ridiculous elements to this comparison, but we might as well start with the fact that Jeremiah Wright doesn’t see the U.S. as “his own” nation; he considers himself a loyal son of the African Motherland, and speaks no harsh words about the continent that produced his ancestors. 

Moreover, the Hebrew prophets lived ascetically and humbly (remember Elijah being fed by ravens in a cave?) and it’s hard to imagine them relishing a multi-million dollar home built with congregational funds, or gleefully commanding the spotlight on PBS or the National Press Club. 

Finally, the prophets were profoundly serious people, virtually possessed by the voice of God, willing to disregard their personal welfare to convey a message.  

Despite the carefully cultivated image as a dashiki-wearing rebel, Jeremiah Wright is a self-serving careerist, a media-mad showoff who will even say things he knows to be untrue (lying about the nature of the Tuskegee Experiment to make people believe the government created AIDS) in order to advance his own standing and interests.  

His egotistical behavior in putting his own standing and publicity ahead of the fate of his supposed friend, Barack Obama, simply provides the latest indication that this unbridled showman is more about profit than he is about prophet.  






Sunday, May 04, 2008
Ragamuffin Soul and the Future of Godblogging
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:22 AM
Here is Ragamuffin Soul, a blog by Carlos Whittaker, a friend of Randy Elrod who is a friend of mine, and whose Ethos is a magnificent blog.

Yesterday I met Fermin Whittaker, the father of Carlos, at the commencement ceremonies at California Baptist University. Carlos encouraged his father to start blogging, which Dr. Whittaker, the Executive Director of the California Southern Baptist Convention, has done, here at A View From Within

"As we talked, our world became smaller," Dr. Whittaker wrote of our few minutes of conversation.  Small world stories have that effect, but behind the simple appreciation for shared friendships was a recognition that four very different people are linked by the new technology, and that the youngest of them by far, Carlos, will be using the medium for evangelization for the rest of his life and not merely a half or a third of it. 

A hundred years from now, church historians are going to be studying how folks like Randy, MarkDRoberts, Joe Carter, John Mark Reynolds, Al Mohler and others transformed the practice of evangelization by embracing, improving, and popularizing blogging and new media.  Carlos and his generation, which includes folks like Alex Chediak, a young faculty member and blogger at CBU, are simply following their lead and extending the reach of the Gospel via the new medium.

Which is a long way of saying you really ought to be planning to be at GodBlog 3 at the second BlogWorld and New Media Expo September in Las Vegas.  The church is changing, and Dr. Whittaker's willingness to be led by his son to use a new tool is an example for the entire church to follow.

And if you are anywhere near Atlanta tomorrow through Wednesday, you should get to the DriveConference.  It is being led by Andy Stanley, whose online invitation includes the wonderful line, "Church is a team sport."




Friday, May 02, 2008
Conservatives Stand Up for TV Ministries
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:35 PM
A group of Christian and conservative orginizations (including the Christian Anti-Defamation League and the 60 Plus Association), as well as conservative leaders (including Paul Weyrich, Ken Blackwell, and Star Parker), are concerned about the Senate Finance Committee's probe into the records of television ministries. 

They signed the following letter, which was delivered to committee members this afternoon:

United States Congress

U.S. Capitol

Washington, DC 20002

May 2, 2008

Dear Senate Finance Committee Member:

We write respectfully to let you know of our concerns about the Senate Finance Committee’s investigation into the finances of several churches, all of which share the same branch of evangelicalism, and all of which promote socially conservative public policy positions such as support for the traditional definition of marriage.

While we recognize that some evangelical teachings and socially conservative policy positions are controversial, and that these churches have been the subject of sensational investigative journalism, we are nonetheless concerned that this would possibly justify an investigation outside the normal confines of the Internal Revenue Service and established administrative and judicial procedures.
Read More...





Tuesday, April 22, 2008
The Semiotics of "God Bless America"
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:32 PM
The Seattle Times today runs a revealing piece by a couple of professors about Barack Obama's use (or non-use) of the phrase "God bless America" and what it means -- or doesn't (HT: Real Clear Politics):

Consider this reality: The omnipresence of "God bless America" as a political slogan is an entirely recent phenomenon. We know because we've run the numbers. Analysis of more than 15,000 public communications by political leaders from Franklin Roosevelt's election in 1932 — the beginning of the modern presidency — through six years of George W. Bush's administration revealed that prior to Ronald Reagan taking office in 1981, the phrase had passed a modern president's lips only once in a major address . . .

They go on to conclude:

That's the problem with the "God bless America" test: Like most of the other tests that constitute modern political discourse, it doesn't mean anything.

They're wrong.  Consider the first excerpt above.  Did the authors ever wonder why the presidents prior to Reagan didn't feel the need to use the phrase?  Could it be that it was because people knew their presidents (Republican and Democrat alike) loved America, considered her an exceptional country, and believed her worthy of seeking God's blessings?

Beginning in the late '60's but really coming to fruition in the post-Watergate, Carter era, many in the New Left made it clear that they didn't believe in American exceptionalism -- and, in fact, didn't consider this country worthy of any blessings, much less God's (assuming, of course, that God wasn't "dead," as so much of the left apparently believed).  Carter-style moral equivalence insisted that this nation wasn't significantly better than the totalitarian Soviet Union.

It was into this environment that the great Ronald Reagan began seeking God's blessing on this country in public.  It was a wonderful and meaningful act.

Contrary to the authors' thesis, when politicians these days say "God bless America," it's more than just a meaningless, ritual invocation of the Almighty.  It's also taken by many of us as a sign of several things: A politician who is not too "sophisticated" to be embarrassed about saying God's name in public; a candidate who is implicitly casting his (or her) lot with those who believe that this land is a good one, one that has already been uniquely blessed by God; and a person who is defining him- or (her-) self as a religious believer.

"God bless America" means a lot -- including, of course "God bless America."








Monday, April 21, 2008
Happy at Home, Depressed About the Rest
Posted by: Michael Medved at 6:06 PM

The recent headline in the New York Times proclaimed:  

“81% IN NEW POLL SAY THE NATION IS HEADED ON THE WRONG TRACK.” 

When you read the body of the poll (by the New York Times and CBS News) the numbers tell an oddly contradictory story. 

“How would you rate the financial condition in your household—72% Good, 27% Bad 

“In the last couple of years have you been….”Getting Ahead or Staying Even, 71%, Falling Behind, 28% 

“How concerned are you that someone in your household might be looking for a job in the next year---Not at all Concerned, 45%; Somewhat concerned  26%, Very Concerned, 28%” 

As usual with these polls, in other words, the respondents make a clear distinction between the state of the country at large (which they learn about from the media) and their own situation (which they know first-hand). 

The contradiction looks as striking as always – 72% who say their own financial condition is “good,” while 81% say the nation at large is on the wrong track. 

Once again, the people express the sense that “I’m Okay…. But everybody else is in a mess.” 

When a majority embraces this puzzling contradiction, it’s evidence of confusion and uncertainty – not desperation.






Monday, April 21, 2008
A Nation of Zacchaeuses: Benedict's Extraordinary Welcome And Messages
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:11 AM
There is so much excellent reporting and commentary on Benedict XVI's visit to the U.S. that it is hard to keep the pointers to a useful two or three.

But start with the Pope's prayer at Ground Zero and with The Anchoress and her understanding of Benedict's roots in the barbarism of the 20th Century.

I am still amazed at the reception Benedict received and the enthusiasm that met him everywhere he went.  For a nation allegedly in the grip of the "new atheism," it sure seemed that there were a few million Zacchaeuses running ahead to catch a glimpse of the successor to St. Peter going about the work of Jesus Christ in the 21rst century.

It may be that Benedict's messages and his meetings mark the moment when the Roman Catholic Church in America began its recovery from the the sex abuse scandal, and began as well to act consistently with the confidence and moral clarity that long distinguished it before disastrous years of indifference to the scandal in its midst, the fecklessness on such issues as President Reagan's bold challenge to the Soviet Union, and the rudderlessness that has marked much of the change that followed Vatican II.  Benedict is such an unlikely fountain of charisma that the enormous outpouring of affection for him must be a long submerged affection for and dedication to the Church he represents --a church of clarity, certainty as to truth, and compassion, and of courageous witness and a commitment to service, especially to those least able to defend themselves.  In other words, a Church built on Christ's courage and example.

As Benedict himself acknowledged, there is still an enormous amount of rebuilding left for the Catholic leadership and laity in the U.S., and new leadership is still urgently needed in many dioceses.  Recovering the sense of mission among the Catholic colleges and universities is obviously a priority for the pope, and an effort that will be ongoing long after his pontificate is ended.

The struggle with America's deep attachment to the pleasures of abundance, its episodic acceptance of its responsibilities as the world's great economic engine and last resort, and its malign elements free to divert, mock and destroy assures that the country will always be struggling to do the right thing and often failing to do so.  But the pope's message at the White House was a brief but powerfully focused appeal to all Americans --Catholic and Protestant, Christian or not, believer or atheist-- to keep in mind America's mission in the world:

"Mr. President, thank you for your gracious words of welcome on behalf of the people of the United States of America. I deeply appreciate your invitation to visit this great country. My visit coincides with an important moment in the life of the Catholic community in America: the celebration of the two-hundredth anniversary of the elevation of the country's first Diocese -- Baltimore -- to a metropolitan Archdiocese, and the establishment of the Sees of New York, Boston, Philadelphia and Louisville. Yet I am happy to be here as a guest of all Americans. I come as a friend, a preacher of the Gospel and one with great respect for this vast pluralistic society. America's Catholics have made, and continue to make, an excellent contribution to the life of their country. As I begin my visit, I trust that my presence will be a source of renewal and hope for the Church in the United States, and strengthen the resolve of Catholics to contribute ever more responsibly to the life of this nation, of which they are proud to be citizens.

"From the dawn of the Republic, America's quest for freedom has been guided by the conviction that the principles governing political and social life are intimately linked to a moral order based on the dominion of God the Creator. The framers of this nation's founding documents drew upon this conviction when they proclaimed the "self-evident truth" that all men are created equal and endowed with inalienable rights grounded in the laws of nature and of nature's God. The course of American history demonstrates the difficulties, the struggles, and the great intellectual and moral resolve which were demanded to shape a society which faithfully embodied these noble principles. In that process, which forged the soul of the nation, religious beliefs were a constant inspiration and driving force, as for example in the struggle against slavery and in the civil rights movement. In our time too, particularly in moments of crisis, Americans continue to find their strength in a commitment to this patrimony of shared ideals and aspirations.
 
"In the next few days, I look forward to meeting not only with America's Catholic community, but with other Christian communities and representatives of the many religious traditions present in this country. Historically, not only Catholics, but all believers have found here the freedom to worship God in accordance with the dictates of their conscience, while at the same time being accepted as part of a commonwealth in which each individual and group can make its voice heard. As the nation faces the increasingly complex political and ethical issues of our time, I am confident that the American people will find in their religious beliefs a precious source of insight and an inspiration to pursue reasoned, responsible and respectful dialogue in the effort to build a more humane and free society.
 
"Freedom is not only a gift, but also a summons to personal responsibility. Americans know this from experience -- almost every town in this country has its monuments honoring those who sacrificed their lives in defense of freedom, both at home and abroad. The preservation of freedom calls for the cultivation of virtue, self-discipline, sacrifice for the common good and a sense of responsibility towards the less fortunate. It also demands the courage to engage in civic life and to bring one's deepest beliefs and values to reasoned public debate. In a word, freedom is ever new. It is a challenge held out to each generation, and it must constantly be won over for the cause of good. Few have understood this as clearly as the late Pope John Paul II. In reflecting on the spiritual victory of freedom over totalitarianism in his native Poland and in eastern Europe, he reminded us that history shows, time and again, that "in a world without truth, freedom loses its foundation," and a democracy without values can lose its very soul. Those prophetic words in some sense echo the conviction of President Washington, expressed in his Farewell Address, that religion and morality represent "indispensable supports" of political prosperity.
 
"The Church, for her part, wishes to contribute to building a world ever more worthy of the human person, created in the image and likeness of God. She is convinced that faith sheds new light on all things, and that the Gospel reveals the noble vocation and sublime destiny of every man and woman. Faith also gives us the strength to respond to our high calling, and the hope that inspires us to work for an ever more just and fraternal society. Democracy can only flourish, as your founding fathers realized, when political leaders and those whom they represent are guided by truth and bring the wisdom born of firm moral principle to decisions affecting the life and future of the nation.
 
"For well over a century, the United States of America has played an important role in the international community. On Friday, God willing, I will have the honor of addressing the United Nations Organization, where I hope to encourage the efforts under way to make that institution an ever more effective voice for the legitimate aspirations of all the world's peoples. On this, the sixtieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the need for global solidarity is as urgent as ever, if all people are to live in a way worthy of their dignity -- as brothers and sisters dwelling in the same house and around that table which God's bounty has set for all his children. America has traditionally shown herself generous in meeting immediate human needs, fostering development and offering relief to the victims of natural catastrophes. I am confident that this concern for the greater human family will continue to find expression in support for the patient efforts of international diplomacy to resolve conflicts and promote progress. In this way, coming generations will be able to live in a world where truth, freedom and justice can flourish -- a world where the God-given dignity and rights of every man, woman and child are cherished, protected and effectively advanced.
 
"Mr. President, dear friends: as I begin my visit to the United States, I express once more my gratitude for your invitation, my joy to be in your midst, and my fervent prayers that Almighty God will confirm this nation and its people in the ways of justice, prosperity and peace. God bless America!"

Rarely does an entire country get a week-long tutorial on its blessings and its duties.  Benedict XVI gave such a seminar, and we are all the better for it.





Friday, April 18, 2008
You Heard It Here First
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 11:38 AM
I was really upset when Jenna Bush turned down the big White House wedding for a ceremony in Crawford. Seriously, how could she diss that kind of super-feel-good PR for her family like that? Do it for your COUNTRY, Jenna!

I digress.

Now, I may be reading waaaay between the lines here, but it looks like there's a chance the Chelsea Clinton is already planning one. I tell ya, they know enough not to pass up on something like that!







Friday, April 18, 2008
Catholic Prayer Breakfast
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:24 AM
I'm at the Catholic prayer breakfast.  Here's a good line President Bush just had about the Pope's visit this week;

"It's been a joyous time for Catholics -- and it wasn't such a bad week for Methodists, either."




Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Democrats Blocking Resolution to Commend Pope
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 8:31 PM
A GOP aide tells me at least one senator is objecting to language in a Senate resolution to welcome the Pope to America because of controversial religious language.

I've got the full story HERE.

Tim Carney is also on this over at the American Conservative blog. He also posted the PDF of the resolution here.





Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Whatever Happened to Freedom of Conscience?
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 11:18 AM
In a story that seems almost too outlandish to believe, CNS is reporting that a Christian photographer in New Mexico was fined for declining to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony.

The "New Mexico Human Rights Commission" is the entity behind this solomonic decision.  Welcome to the brave new world of "human rights" in the United States -- is the commission likewise going to force atheists to photograph baptisms and confirmations against their will?

Who knew that any body in the U.S. would be following so quickly behind the Canadian Human Rights Commission -- another bully that has lately been persecuting the brilliant Mark Steyn?

Isn't freedom of conscience a human right, too?






Tuesday, April 15, 2008
The Devastating Cost of Family Fragmentation
Posted by: Michael Medved at 6:38 PM

An important new study of divorce and out-of-wedlock birth shows that taxpayers lose more than a hundred billion each year to cover the costs of family break-up.  

The Institute for American Values and allied organizations analyzed the additional costs to the legal system, welfare programs, and anti-poverty efforts as bureaucrats, cops and social workers try to cope with the tens of millions of kids and adults in fatherless households.  

The report proves that even a minor improvement in family stability would save the taxpayer billions. A mere 1 percent decline in family fragmentation would, for instance, save the taxpayer at least $1.1 billion every year. Defending and repairing the institution of marriage is therefore not just a moral issue: it’s a major factor in healing a wide range of social problems, rejuvenating our troubled economy, and avoiding governmental bankruptcy.  

Those who can’t depend on strong families far too often become the dependents of government.






Monday, April 14, 2008
Are "Christian Seders" Inappropriate for Passover?
Posted by: Michael Medved at 6:23 PM

Rabbi Mark Glickman of the very liberal Reform branch of Judaism recently wrote a Seattle Times column decrying Christian congregations that celebrate their own Passover Seders. Rabbi Glickman claims the Seder was developed long after the Exodus events it commemorates, and was supposed to convey powerful anti-Christian messages, making Christian participation inappropriate.  

In truth, there’s nothing in the ancient formulation of the Passover Haggadah—the book of Seder liturgy—that disrespects or contradicts Christianity or Jesus, and most Jews passionately disagree with Rabbi Glickman. Retelling the story Exodus and affirming Jewish faith doesn’t amount to an attack on Christianity – any more than affirming Christian faith amounts to an attack on the Old Testament or Judaism.  

The two religions certainly disagree on key theological points, but share a commitment to remembering God’s deliverance from Egyptian bondage as a liberating moment in human history. Christian rediscovery of the Jewish roots of Christianity is actually good for Jews, Christians and humanity. 





« Previous123456789101617Next »

FEATURES FEATURES

TH Exclusive: Interview with Bob Barr

Posted by: Matt Lewis
5/13/2008

Earmark... Defeated

Posted by: John Campbell
5/13/2008

The PAYGO Waive Off

Posted by: John Campbell
5/12/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 7 Minutes 28 Seconds Ago
Last updated 23 Minutes 7 Seconds Ago
Last updated 44 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
Last updated 47 Minutes 26 Seconds Ago
Last updated 47 Minutes 58 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns Columns
Your Blogs Your Blogs