Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Friday, May 16, 2008
(Video) From the book, "STUPID Liberals ALWAYS do the same thing..."
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 10:23 PM
Personally I find it stunning that they never learn.

Whenever Bush makes a speech, even if he doesn't refer to them, name their names, say anything about them... they jump up and say, "I am NOT they way you describe me to be!!!!!!"

Have you ever noticed?

Like when the President uttered the words in the State of the Union referring to the fact that Iraq had sought uranium in AFRICA? Immediately that weekend Joe Wilson the mint julep queen goes on Andrea Mitchell, and starts talking about how the President was referring to his trip to NIGER. (Last I checked Africa is a wee bit bigger than Niger.)

Yesterday the President makes a comment that could have included most of Western Europe, ALL of Eastern Europe, and God only knows who else across the spectrum. He could have been referring to the Arab nations even neighboring Israel - the nation to whom he was speaking. He NEVER mentioned Barack Obama, The United States, or the Democratic Party... so what do American liberals do?

They blow their lids. Biden, Pelosi, Clinton, Obama, and Obama's nasty-faced campaign staffers ALL run out like spoiled brats screaming at television cameras, "HOW DARE HE TALK ABOUT US THAT WAY?"

They were indignant, insufferable, indiscreet, and very unintelligent in their presentations. Even television liberals - who sometimes (not often) still actually check the text of speeches - had drank the kool-aid, and then tried to say Bush HAD referred to Obama by citing his Press Secretary DENYING that he had referred to Obama. How the heck does that even work?

"Bush referred to Obama..."

"Where in his text did he refer to Obama?"

"No where he just was..."

"Sorry but the language of his speech doesn't refer to any person specifically..."

"Yeah but he was referring to Obama."

"No I don't believe he referred to anyone specifically."

"SEE YOU JUST DENIED IT - that PROVES he was referring to Obama..."

Then you add to that the Pelosi presser, the Clinton presser, and the nasty-face Obama campaign staffers all out there snarling - telling everyone how "beneath the dignity of the office" it was for Bush to attack Obama - on foreign soil. (To which he did not...)

And the foreign soil thing comes up... See - when the Dixie Chicks stand on stage somewhere and they actually NAME the President, and the United States, and actually, specifically refer to our foreign policy as being an embarrassment - that is the textbook definition of being unpatriotic. Now they all wanna say Bush did the same thing, but with no references to the United States, Barack Obama, the US' foreign policy - or anything even remotely resembling an attack on another U.S. Citizen, elected official, or even candidate.

Can SOMEONE PLEASE explain to me what the heck the liberals' problem is?

If you've got John Kerry, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Obama's nasty-face campaign staffers all out there gettin' all uppity about President Bush saying something - HE NEVER SAID - doesn't that bode poorly for their potential to handle an actual crisis someday?

I was on the road between DC and NYC last night listening to the debate on many of the news outlets... Mark Steyn actually said it best on Hannity and Colmes - but I have not yet been able to find the footage. But a close second had to be Newt's opening round with kool-aid drinker Alan Colmes... watch and learn people. Watch and learn... liberals are just thick-headed less than genius types and running circles around them gets really easy - when they make such bone-headed blunders...





Thursday, December 20, 2007
The GOP Class of 2007: We Hardly New Ye ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:44 PM


With 2007 almost over, it's time to reflect on the GOP candidates who touched our lives -- and ruined our debates -- before dropping out of the race for president this year ...

1.  Jim Gilmore The Grinch Candidate:  As he runs for U.S. Senate in Virginia against Mark Warner, no candidate will be missed less from the presidential field than Jim Gilmore.  Other than advancing the term, "RudyMcRomney," he contributed little to the debate.  Sadly, his quixotic presidential campaign probably also hurt his already diminished reputation in the Commonwealth.

2.  Tommy Thompson - The Jim Croce Candidate: Thompson's campaign proved you can't save time in a bottle.  In the 90s, he was a rock star.  In 2007, not so much ...

3.  Sam Brownback - The "On-Paper" Candidate - Of all the candidates to drop out in 2007, Brownback may have the brightest future.  He has a good shot of being elected Governor of Kansas, and then, who knows?  No doubt, in 2007, Sam Brownback learned a valuable lesson about politics:  That the facts matter less than image.  Though he was clearly the social conservative candidate on paper, he was out-"charisma'd" by Romney and Huckabee.  One wonders if Brownback's exodus has helped Huckabee become the undisputed "Christian candidate."  Additionally, it will be interesting to see if Brownback's endorsement of John McCain will have a lasting impact ...

4.  Tom Tancredo - The Single-Issue Candidate - Credited with heping advance the issue of immigration into the national debate, there was something about the way Tom Tancredo spoke that made one a bit nervous.  I don't mean the positions he took -- as much as I mean his elocution.  While he wasn't ready for the national stage, Tancredo is rumored to be considering a bid for the U.S. Senate. 

Note:  Newt Gingrich "The Tease" candidate - Newt deserves an honorable mention for persuading me to travel to Atlanta, GA two days before he announced he wouldn't be running for president ...

Update:  Tancredo's greatest contribution to the GOP nomination may be endorsing Mitt Romney.




Thursday, November 08, 2007
America’s Red, White and Blue Platforms
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:53 AM


As I noted the other day, Newt Gingrich's American Solutions recently conducted six nationwide polls on six different topics, including: national security, border security and immigration, energy and the environment, taxes and the economy, and religion in public life.

According to the surveys, the following are "America's most widely held views":

96%  It is important for the President and Congress to address the issue of social security in the next few years.

95%  We have an obligation to be good stewards of God’s creation for future generations.

94%  Children should be allowed a moment of silence to pray to themselves in public school if they desire.

93%  Al Qaeda poses a very serious threat for the United States.

93%  In the worker visa program, each worker should take an oath to obey the United States law, and to be deported if the worker commits a crime while in the United States.

93%  It is important to acknowledge today that the reference to God in the Declaration of Independence – that we are endowed by our Creator with the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

92%  Our focus should clearly be to provide long-term solutions instead of short-term fixes.

91%  We should dramatically increase our investment in math and science education.

91%  We should hold city governments to the same standards for cleaning waste water as are applied to the private industry.

90%  We favor a law that allows public school children to take a moment of silence for prayer if they desire.

90%  We approve of a Christmas tree or a Menorah being placed on public property during the holiday season.

90%  We should give tax credits to homeowners and builders who incorporate alternative energy sources in their homes, like solar, wind, and geothermal energy.








Tags: newt



Friday, October 19, 2007
Newt... LIVE from the Values Voters Summit!
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 5:35 PM

I wandered in well into his remarks. Following my broadcast I had been in the halls reconnecting with valiant pro-life friends like Jill Stanek, Bobby Schindler, Rick Santorum, and Star Parker. Which if you missed you can catch on PodCAST heres Hour 1 and Hour 2. Our guests included the TownHall All-Stars, Dr. Tony Perkins, Presidential Candidate Congressman Duncan Hunter, Focus On The Family, and Bishop Harry Jackson.

But when everything had died down I wandered into the main hall again and listened to Newt Gingrich be better than I had ever heard him. (BTW... you can view any or all of the segments via the internet for a mere donation of $9.95. And from what I understand that is an unlimited access to the going's on for the entirety of the weekend.)

But back to Newt - he was drawing out the comparison between those who want to expunge any and all references to "God" and he applied it more simply than I had ever heard it put.

He painted the picture of 625,000 dead soldiers at the hands of ourselves. And following that moment of the Civil War president Lincoln realized that his nation was at odds with itself more so than it ever possibly would be again. After all we had taken up arms against our own.

So on the occasion of his second inaugural in the light of such circumstances he said these words:

At this second appearing to take the oath of the presidential office, there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement, somewhat in detail, of a course to be pursued, seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention, and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself; and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.

On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago, all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it--all sought to avert it. While the inaugeral [sic] address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war--seeking to dissole [sic] the Union, and divide effects, by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came.

One eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the Southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was, somehow, the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union, even by war; while the government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war, the magnitude, or the duration, which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before, the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces; but let us judge not that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered; that of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has his own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!" If we shall suppose that American Slavery is one of those offences which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South, this terrible war, as the woe due to those by whom the offence came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a Living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope--fervently do we pray--that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether"

With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan--to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.

If the secularists have their way... they would have to argue for the removal of THAT speech. That it would have to be sand blasted from the stone that it now sits engraved enshrined in at Lincoln's memorial.

One nation - under God, and we are always better for the reality of that truth being known!






Saturday, September 29, 2007
Thoughts on Newt Not Running
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:04 PM
According to the AP ...

Interesting that he didn't come to this conclusion until after the seminars (and after all the attention he's gotten these last several days and weeks).

... So he gets us to pay attention to him and his conference, and then sneaks out the door the next morning, leaving behind a breakup note on a sticky pad. 

I feel so jilted.  What a tease ...


Tags: newt



Saturday, September 29, 2007
Newt said WHAT?
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 2:22 PM

Yawwwwwn...

Friends really, this is not news! Newt had less of a chance of becoming President than Bill Clinton not checking out the next waitress that serves him...

UPDATE: (ok I didn't intend for a double-meaning-Monica-reference there - but the fact that some of you THOUGHT SO underscores the point just a bit don't you think!)






Saturday, September 29, 2007
A Newtworthy Interview ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:39 AM

On Thursday, when I interviewed Newt Gingrich, he made a comment about Governor Romney which immediately struck me as newsworthy.  Turns out, it was; it's quoted by reporter Kit Seelye in today's New York Times print (and online) edition:

“As a middle-class person, I can’t compete with Governor Romney, who can write a personal check for a hundred million dollars,” Mr. Gingrich told Matt Lewis, a blogger with Townhall .com, referring to Mitt Romney, a Republican presidential candidate and the former governor of Massachusetts. “But if there is a big enough citizen movement that wants to have somebody who could debate Senator Clinton next year and somebody who could outline and articulate our values, then I think we’d be compelled to run.”

Reporters (and bloggers) love conflict, and that's why this quote made a splash.  Speaker Gingrich knows this unwritten rule as well as anyone, and clearly wanted me to quote this line ... But why? (I have my theories, but that's for another day).

It will be interesting to see how this plays out ...



Tags: Romney newt



Friday, September 28, 2007
GOP Consultants Agree with Newt (Sort of) ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 2:07 PM

Yesterday, during an interview with Rob Bluey and Ed MorrisseyNewt Gingrich said this:  

I think Republican consultants are mostly very stupid. I think they have no education. I think they have no sense of history. ... If I throw away African Americans, and then I throw away Latinos, and then I throw away suburban women, and then I throw away people under 40, and then I throw away everything north of Philadelphia -- there's a morning where Republicans can't get to a majority.

When Newt talks about "throwing away" votes, he is talking about what consultants refer to as "targeting."  The concept is simple: Campaigns live in a world of limited resources, so it makes sense to ignore "hard-to-get" votes and instead, focus your time, talent, and treasure toward likely voters you deem to be undecided and/or persuadable.  The problem with this, as Newt points out, is that over time it means you are losing -- not gaining -- supporters. 

I asked a few top GOP consultants to chime in on Newt's comments.  To my surprise, they thought he made some good points ...

Terry Nelson who served as Political Director for the Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign, as well as campaign manager for John McCain told me this:

Newt is right. We have to compete for these constituencies in order to win elections. And we have a message for them, so we should not be shy about saying what we believe. If we don't, we will lose. This is one of the reasons the Bush-Cheney campaign focused so much on expanding our vote with these voters.
Read More...

Tags: newt



Friday, September 28, 2007
Newt Would Announce on CSPAN
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:24 AM
Mark Memmott over at USA Today's On Politics blog references these two quotes from my interview with Newt yesterday ..

"Some of (the other GOP candidates) thought that they would announce on Letterman or Leno or something like that. ... I would probably do it on C-SPAN.  And I'd probably do it with an hour-long speech."

"As a middle-class person, I can't compete with governor Romney -- who can write a personal check for a hundred million dollars. But if there is a big enough citizen movement that wants to have somebody who could debate Sen. Clinton next year and somebody who could outline and articulate our values, then I think we'd be compelled to run."

Update - 9:56:  Here's the webcast of the American Solutions kick-off.


Tags: newt



Thursday, September 27, 2007
My Newt Interview
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 12:00 PM
Just concluded my interview with Newt.  He says he will decide whether or not to run by Oct. 21.  His announcement would be an hour speech on CSPAN.  He feels announcing on Leno or Letterman is unserious.

Here's the audio of our interview (video will follow).  Please note that we are making small talk for the first 10 seconds before the interview actually begins ...



Tags: newt



Thursday, September 27, 2007
In Hotlanta ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:33 AM
Happy American Solutions Day!

I'm in Atlanta at the Cobb Galleria, where former Speaker Newt Gingrich will kick-off his American Solutions seminar tonight.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Neil Boortz is broadcasting right now ...  At least one presidential candidate is seeking Newt's supporters ...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

More to come ...

Update - 11:49:  Dan Kotman, American Solutions spokesman, tells me that almost all the GOP candidates will have representatives at the event.  All GOP and Democrat candidates were invited.  In fact, Kucinich will have a table ...

Tags: newt



Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Talkin' Newt with Capt. Ed
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:17 PM
I'll be on Captain Ed's show today at 3 PM (eastern) to discuss Newt Gingrich's American Solutions Conference.  (We will both be in Atlanta tomorrow for the kick-off) ...

... Listen here.

Tags: newt



Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Campaign '08 Update ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:17 AM


... I noted earlier today that the today’s Washington Times reports Newt Gingrich is hinting he may get in the presidential race.  Also today, an op-ed in the WaPost points out that Fred Thompson is lacking ideas and specific details – a problem Newt never has.  A few months back, I wrote a column for Politico in which I argue Newt’s entry into the race would be healthy for the GOP, as he would force the other candidates to address some important ideas (instead of merely relying on platitudes).  Might it be coming true?

... The Club for Growth has launced a new website called Tax Hike Mike.  Meanwhile, the AP's Ron Fournier implies Mike Huckabee's little spat with Ron Paul, during last week's debate, may have been a calculated maneuver to prove he's "tough enough" to be president.  Well, it surely wasn't an "I paid for this microphone" moment, but who knows???

... Fred Thompson says that he doesn't go to church much when he's in McLean.  Fred -- check this out.




Friday, August 10, 2007
On My Radar ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:20 AM


... According to the Cincinnati Enquirer, "Newt Gingrich has seen the future of the Republican Party, and it is in France."

... Politico's
Jonathan Martin reports that Romney and Rudy keep battling on immigration. My thought: Immigration killed John McCain's campaign. Might it also bring down Rudy?

... Regarding last night's gay LOGO debate, On Call reported that Doogie Houser was in the house.

Tags: mccain Romney Rudy newt



Thursday, July 26, 2007
Newt, Novak, and the AmSpecfasts
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:40 PM

Newt Gingrich is now saying (via Rick Tyler) that he did not refer to Republican presidential candidates as "pygmies," yesterday ... that instead, reporter Bill Sammon just didn't understand Gingrich's historical reference about de Gaulle and the Fourth Republic (or intentionally got it wrong).

... But isn't that also part of Newt's problem ... that he uses historical references that confuse even political "insiders"? The prospect of him using those big words and references in a presidential race sort of reminds me of Dennis Miller's Monday Night Football analogies.

By the way, this remark happened at the American Spectator Breakfast on Monday (held at American's for Tax Reform).

Today's AmSpecfast featured Bob Novak, who reportedly said that Republicans are "mean-spirited." I wonder if his press secretary will attack me for reporting that?

Update - 3:33 PM: Philip Klein vouches for Rick Tyler’s statement regarding Newt’s “pygmies” comment.



Tags: novak newt


« Previous1Next »

FEATURES FEATURES

Sugar, we're (not) going down swinging...

Posted by: Matt Lewis
10/10/2008

Truly a Scandal

Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau
10/10/2008

On "Panic," Recovery and Dynamic Capitalism

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt
10/10/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 16 Minutes 46 Seconds Ago
Last updated 18 Minutes 54 Seconds Ago
Last updated 21 Minutes 58 Seconds Ago
Last updated 22 Minutes 44 Seconds Ago
Last updated 25 Minutes 51 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns