Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Sunday, July 06, 2008
What If They Were Republicans?
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 4:51 PM
This piece in the newest edition of Newsweek by Evan Thomas is describing an Obama fundraiser for LA's Democrat elite, held in the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion (the former site of the Oscars):

Couples willing to donate $28,500 got to dine beforehand with the candidate, Barack Obama, who gave his usual stump speech and mocked his opponent, John McCain, for believing "that a bunch of oil rigs along the California coast was a good idea." (McCain had just recommended that states be allowed to opt out of the federal ban on offshore drilling.) This last zinger got a roar from the crowd, not a few of whom own shorefront properties in places like Malibu and Santa Barbara.

Thomas' observation is interesting.  Sometimes it is tempting to wonder how much of the opposition to drilling among this crowd is strictly disinterested concern for the environment, how much just a crass NIMBY issue (remember how Teddy Kennedy killed an off-shore wind farm that, he feared, would affect the view from his Hyannis compound?).

In any case, to the extent that these Democrats see themselves as champions of the "working person," the attitude is repellant.  If Republicans -- much less the dreaded oil companies! -- were behaving this way, isn't it likely that we'd be hearing a lot more about how careless plutocrats are willing to let regular people "suffer" at the gas pump, just for their own selfish benefit?




Sunday, July 06, 2008
What If Barack Had Been President?
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:30 PM
From today's London Times:

American and Iraqi forces are driving Al-Qaeda in Iraq out of its last redoubt in the north of the country in the culmination of one of the most spectacular victories of the war on terror. 

After being forced from its strongholds in the west and centre of Iraq in the past two years, Al-Qaeda’s dwindling band of fighters has made a defiant “last stand” in the northern city of Mosul.

So much for the argument that Barack's superior "judgment" justifies his election as President.  If his policy had won the day, American troops would have been leaving Iraq with their tails between their legs, and Al-Qaeda in Iraq would be proclaiming triumph.

After all, here is what Barack had to say as of September 13, 2007:

There is no military solution in Iraq, and there never was.  The best way to protect our security and to pressure Iraq's leaders to resolve their civil war is to immediately begin to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year, but now. (emphasis added).







Sunday, July 06, 2008
What FARC Can Teach Barack (and the Left)
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:26 PM

The rescue of hostages held by FARC, a Colombian terrorist group, has some important lessons to teach both Barack Obama and the left generally about dealing with bad guys across the world.

1. Sometimes, action is more effective than talk.

Reporters Without Borders was one of the groups most insistent on dialogue with the terrorists.  But after learning through laptops obtained in the wake of the rescues that the terrorists had actually had no intention of releasing the American or French hostages.  According to an account in the Wall Street Journal its leader had this to say:

"I have to recognize that the strong hand has prevailed," said human-rights activist Robert Menard, founder and secretary-general of Reporters Without Borders. "Our insistence on the need to negotiate with the FARC, hoping they would release their most valuable card, was foolish."

Yep.  Keep in mind that there are, indeed, people out there who can't be cajoled, charmed, bribed or reasoned out of their chosen (terrorist) course.


2. Sometimes, "negotiation" is just a way to dupe the naive.

Barack Obama has said that he'd meet with Hugo Chavez without precondition (although, in fairness, he's now "refined his position" on that stand, as well).

Problem is, of course, that in this whole FARC scenario, Chavez was using the pretext of negotiations as a way to achieve a propaganda victory for himself -- and to forge closer ties with the terrorists.  Ostensibly, the purpose of the negotiations was to free the hostages.  But for Chavez, they were nothing but a cynical ploy.

In other words, we can "negotiate" with guys like Chavez all we want.  That doesn't mean that they'll be negotiating with us in good faith.

 






Sunday, July 06, 2008
Obama Has Nothing to Fear (Except for Becoming a "Politician")
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:54 AM
Over at the WaPost, Peter Beinart argues that Barack Obama's shameless and transparent move to the center on foreign policy is also a bad political strategy:
Because Americans are less afraid and because Republicans have abandoned the foreign policy center, Democrats need not worry that Obama will suffer the fate of George McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale or John Kerry. He won't lose because he looks weak. The greater danger is that he will change positions in a bid to look strong -- as he recently did on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- and come across as inauthentic and insincere. As Ruy Teixeira and John Halpin have noted, the Democrats' biggest political liability is not that Americans believe they are too liberal but rather that they believe that Democrats don't stand for anything at all. On foreign policy, Obama has a chance to change that: to articulate a vision based on the principles of global cooperation and human dignity that animated Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. He shouldn't be deterred by fears of being called soft. Those fears are the echoes of a bygone age.
(Emphasis mine).

It was supposedly Hillary's fear of being portrayed as "weak" that forced her to adopt a more "hawkish" position.  This, of course, allowed Obama to attract the left-wing of the party, and arguably led to Obama's winning the Democratic nomination. 

Some would argue that her sin was in adopting a General Election strategy before she wrapped-up the nomination. 

Still, it is interesting to consider whether or not Obama is essentially now running on Hillary's primary platform, rather than his own.





Saturday, July 05, 2008
Obama's "Spiritual Journey": Where's Jeremiah Wright?
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:50 PM
The Washington Post has a lengthy story on Obama's current account of his faith journey.

The story, strangely, leaves unexamined the role of Pastor Wright in Obama's spiritual journey.  How can a story allegedly about Obama's religious beliefs not discuss in depth the influence of Jeremiah Wright, which is detailed in Obama's memoir, Dreams of My Father? 

It cannot, of course, and it is not a serious story as a result. It is a certain that Obama wants to airbrush Pastor Wright and his views from the candidate's biography, but ought the nation's leading paper cooperate in the exercise?

Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama is greeted enthusiastically at a conference of the African Methodist Episcopal Church in St. Louis.
                       (By Jae C. Hong -- Associated Press)

UPDATE: David Mark and Kenneth Vogel have a story at Politico.com today on Obama's first memoir.





Saturday, July 05, 2008
How Jesse Helms Gave us Reagan
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 12:59 PM


"The George Bailey test" is a way of measuring the impact a person has had on the world.  It comes from the movie "It's a Wonderful Life," of course, which starred Reagan's friend Jimmy Stewart.  The test asks the question; what would the world be like if you had never been born?  When you ask that question regarding Jesse Helms, you begin to see what a dramatic impact he had on the U.S. -- and the world.

A lot has been written about Jesse Helms' senate career these last couple of days, but it should also be noted that without Helms (and the support of his friend Tom Ellis), we quite possibly would never have had a President Reagan. 

In 1976, Jesse Helms (then the junior Senator) first helped persuade Reagan to seek the presidency, and then engineered a stunning come-from-behind victory for Reagan in North Carolina.  This was Reagan's first victory over Ford, and it probably kept Reagan from dropping out of the race.  What is more, the win led to more wins and gave Reagan the momentum to go all the way to the convention, nearly wresting the GOP nomination away from sitting President Gerald Ford

Because of Helms' support, Reagan left the '76 campaign with the momentum and clout that would propel him to win the nomination in '80.  The truth is, we owe a debt of gratitude to Helms for everything Reagan was able to accomplish.

In fact, his early support of Reagan was so significant that even if you put aside his entire Senate career and accomplishments -- which were substantial -- Helms legacy would still be remarkable.  Without Helms' support in '76, we likely wouldn't have gotten Reagan in '80.

Another interesting thing to note about Helms is that he started out as a reporter.  Interestingly, Paul Weyrich -- a founder of the modern-day conservative movement -- also started out as a reporter.  It is ironic (but probably not surprising) that these men -- along with a movie star president -- were able to take on the media elites in the 60s, 70s, and 80s -- and often win.





Saturday, July 05, 2008
Kent Snyder: Helped Create Ron Paul Movement
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 12:53 PM
A few days ago the chairman of Ron Paul's presidential campaign passed away.  Kent Snyder was largely responsible for turning the Paul campaign into a national grassroots movement.  Our thoughts and prayers are with his family.





Saturday, July 05, 2008
Getting the Whole Story
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 11:49 AM
American MSM headlines proclaim heartening news for Barack, like "Polls: Obama leads by 100" (in today's Baltimore Sun blog), "Obama: Strength Out of Weakness" (column in The Washington Post) and "McCain struggles to regain his footing" (from the AP).

But look a little deeper.  It takes the Economic Times of India to report on the fact that "aggressive progressives" at Democrats.com are threatening to withhold money from the Obama campaign.  It takes Newsbusters to report that leftists like Tom Hayden are voicing deep concern for the Obama campaign in light of Barack's new equivocations about leaving Iraq.

This tells you two things.  One, that now more than even, the MSM may not be the best place to go to get the full story about what's really happening in the campaign (like that's a news flash . . .).  Second, it helps explain how liberals are so bitter and surprised when they lose elections.  Republicans are always getting bad news in the MSM (see McCain story above, for example).  But Democrats who restrict their reading to the MSM almost always see a sunnier picture -- and then, lo and behold, Election Day turns out to be a major disappointment.






Friday, July 04, 2008
Veep Talk (and more) on Fox ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:37 PM
I was on Fox earlier today talking about "veep" picks, as well as other political topics.



Special thanks to Matt Naugle for posting the video.





Friday, July 04, 2008
Why Jesse Helm's is the Country's Favorite Conservative Senator
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:25 PM
More than a decade ago, Morton Blackwell wrote a tribute to Sen. Helms.  Below is an excerpt.  Read the whole thing here.

Why has Sen. Jesse Helms for so long been our country's very favorite conservative senator? Why do we love him?

Let me count the reasons:

  1. In every word and deed, Sen. Helms embodies solid conservative principles. No one else in the Senate, no one at all, comes even close to his reputation for selfless, steadfast adherence to every tenet of our conservative philosophy. Name the issue, and I can tell you how he will vote. Name the issue. Free enterprise. Limited government. Strong national defense. Traditional values. Name the issue. Jesse Helms is predictable.

    That is why we admire and love him. And that is why he's the conservative liberals love to hate.

  2. Sen. Helms forces votes on issues the liberals don't want to vote on. Time and again, year in and year out, Sen. Helms has been the only conservative prepared to make the Senate vote on conservative issues where most politicians are on the opposite side from the American people. Think about all the liberal senators who have been defeated by more conservative challengers since 1972. It's a fact. Jesse Helms made every one of those liberals vulnerable. He gave them all voting records their challengers could run against. Jesse Helms makes democracy work.

    That is why we admire and love him. And that is why he's the conservative liberals love to hate.






Friday, July 04, 2008
Consider the Contrast
Posted by: Michael Medved at 4:11 PM

Striking Constrast in These Brief Bulletins from LBN News Alerts---

First, a PROFILE IN JELLO
 

LBN-PRESIDENTIAL BACK ROOM:   ***Senator Barack Obama said he might "refine" his Iraq policies after meeting with military commanders there later this summer. But hours later he held a second news conference to emphasize his commitment to the withdrawing of all combat troops from Iraq within 16 months of taking office.  

And then, a PROFILE IN COURAGE

CONDOLEEZZA RICE SAYS SHE'S 'PROUD' OF DECISION TO INVADE IRAQ": Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said she's "proud" of the U.S. decision to wage the Iraq war and insisted that the world is not more dangerous than it was when George W. Bush took office. "We're now beginning to see that perhaps it's not so popular to be a suicide bomber. We're beginning to see that perhaps people are questioning whether Osama Bin Laden ought to really be the face of Islam," Rice, 53, said in an interview to be broadcast this weekend on Bloomberg Television's "Conversations with Judy Woodruff.






Friday, July 04, 2008
Happy Independence Day!
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:02 PM

Ronald Reagan, "What the Fourth of July Means to Me"

July Fourth is the birthday of our nation. I believed as a boy, and believe even more today, that it is the birthday of the greatest nation on earth.

The day of our nation's birth in that little hall in Philadelphia, [was] a day on which debate had raged for hours. The men gathered there were honorable men hard-pressed by a king who had flouted the very laws they were willing to obey. Even so, to sign the Declaration of Independence was such an irretrievable act that the walls resounded with the words "treason, the gallows, the headsman's axe," and the issue remained in doubt.
. . . 

In recent years . . . I've come to think of [Independence Day] as more than just the birthday of a nation.

It also commemorates the only true philosophical revolution in all history.

Oh, there have been revolutions before and since ours. But those revolutions simply exchanged one set of rules for another. Ours was a revolution that changed the very concept of government.

Let the Fourth of July always be a reminder that here in this land, for the first time, it was decided that man is born with certain God-given rights; that government is only a convenience created and managed by the people, with no powers of its own except those voluntarily granted to it by the people.

Thank you, troops, for preserving our freedom; thank you, heroes and heroines of all stripes who have led this country wisely and well -- and most of all, thanks to the Creator who has blessed us with a country so generous, and free, and fair.  Happy Fourth of July!








Friday, July 04, 2008
Thanks to Those Who Keep Our Independence
Posted by: Tom DeLay at 9:21 AM

First off, Happy Independence Day to all of the Townhall readers out there. I know many of you, like me, spend the holiday with friends and family enjoying apple pie and fireworks.  This is also a time for us to celebrate the bravery of our men and women in the Armed Forces, and their courage to keep us free.  My wife introduced me to this new campaign to show our support for the troops.  It’s very easy, but meaningful at the same time.

http://www.gratitudecampaign.org/fullmovie.php

It’s shocking how many times I have approached a soldier to thank him, and to see that he is embarrassed by it.  I’m sure most of it is due to their humble nature, but I can’t stop thinking that in this day and age, when cynicism and indifference seem to be laudable character traits, that maybe they’re just not used to the positive attention.  Either way, it’s best to shake their hand and give them a sincere “thank you” but this is a terrific gesture just the same. 

Have a happy, and safe Independence Day.





« Previous12345678910966967Next »

FEATURES FEATURES

Obama's "Spiritual Journey": Where's Jeremiah Wright?

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt
7/5/2008

How Jesse Helms Gave us Reagan

Posted by: Matt Lewis
7/5/2008

America Is Not An Accident

Posted by: Tom DeLay
7/3/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 17 Minutes 7 Seconds Ago
Last updated 23 Minutes 14 Seconds Ago
Last updated 25 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
Last updated 25 Minutes 40 Seconds Ago
Last updated 37 Minutes 16 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns Columns
Your Blogs Your Blogs