Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Ben Shapiro :: Townhall.com Columnist
2006: The year of retreat
by Ben Shapiro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


On July 14, 1940, Prime Minister Winston Churchill of Britain addressed the nation on BBC Radio. The last month had seen the complete collapse of French and British resistance to German aggression on the continent of Europe. The French Army had been decisively defeated, and the Allied armies had been evacuated back to Britain from the coastline at Dunkirk. On June 14, the Nazis had marched into Paris.

In the aftermath of the string of devastating defeats that had isolated Britain and left Europe prostrate before Hitler, Churchill spoke. "Should the invader come to Britain, there will be no placid lying down of the people in submission before him, as we have seen, alas, in other countries," Churchill stated. "I stand at the head of a Government representing all Parties in the State -- all creeds, all classes, every recognizable section of opinion. . . . We are supported by a free Parliament and a free Press; but there is one bond which unites us all and sustains us in the public regard -- namely (as is increasingly becoming known), that we are prepared to proceed to all extremities, to endure them and to enforce them; that is our bond of union in His Majesty's Government tonight. Thus only, in times like these, can nations preserve their freedom; and thus only can they uphold the cause entrusted to their care. . . . This is no war of chieftains or of princes, of dynasties or national ambition; it is a war of peoples and of causes."

Now America stands where Britain did. We are engaged in a war of peoples and causes, Islamic against Western. We are isolated; the Europeans (aside from the stalwart British) have abandoned the cause of Western civilization in favor of a crippling post-modernism that promises an Islamic future.

We have been vastly more successful than the Allies were in the early months of World War II; we have toppled two enemy regimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. We have also suffered moral defeats; we watch, horrified, as terrorists wage a day-by-day war of attrition and our allies capitulate, one by one.

But unlike the British during World War II, we doubt ourselves. Our government is not united in its determination to fight the threat posed by a radical Islamic civilization; it is divided along partisan lines, with members of the Democratic Party willing to undermine the cause in favor of gradual submission to Islamic tyranny and terror. Our people are not unified in their readiness to fight our enemies unceasingly; many voters are willing to blithely live under the ever-present shadow of Islamic terrorism rather than face up to the unpleasant truths of war. And no one, including our leadership, is willing to "proceed to all extremities, to endure them and to enforce them." We hamstring our troops in the field, we capitulate to the wishes of appeasement-minded quasi-allies, and we somehow hope that the bromide of tolerance and diversity will assuage the grievances of our Hitlerian enemies.

2006 saw the rise of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, fanatically intent on annihilating Israel, remolding Iraq in the Iranian image and threatening the West with nuclear weaponry. And 2006 saw Western civilization respond with platitudes and pusillanimity.

2006 saw Islamic terrorists operate openly from government offices in Palestinian Arab areas, and towns and villages in southern Lebanon. And 2006 saw Israel respond by restricting its military action and planning a strategic retreat from more and more of its own land.

2006 saw Islamic civilization's murderous rage over Danish cartoons and papal pronouncements. And 2006 saw Western civilization respond by censoring its own press and demanding papal apologies.

2006 saw an Islamic terrorist plot to simultaneously bomb 10 airliners. And 2006 saw the American press respond to the threat of Islamic terror by treasonously revealing classified information, showing terrorist propaganda videos and fictionalizing news accounts to put America in the wrong.

The enemy presses us from all sides; he weakens us internally. 2006 saw Western civilization doubt the justice of its cause and shy away from the means necessary to preserve its survival. But 2007 can be the turning point, when we recognize the nature of the threat we face and steel our wills to finish the battle our enemies began on September 11, 2001. What we do now will decide the fate of countless millions; we can destroy the chains forged by Islamic civilization to bind our children. We can lead the unborn into the warmth and sunlight of freedom or we can condemn them to shackles. History will judge us harshly if we do not turn around now, stand our ground and say to our enemies, "The triumph of liberty begins here."

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ben Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United States and Canada and author of Project President: Bad Hair and Botox on the Road to the White House.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ben Shapiro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Matthew - The Non-Nation Fringe Groups

So, how should the Hammas, Hezbola, Al Quada, Islamic Court, Al Sadr and other independent militias / terrorists groups be treated.

These are direct affronts to Nation Building Phase one and two.

Can they be ignored? - Definitely No!

Can they be politically neutralized? - ????? I dont know how. They use fear to keep political power. This is in direct conflict with Phase five, perhaps the most important element of Nation Building.




Matthew - Status of the Middle East
As relates to Nation Building Phases described above, consider the following:

Iraq is somewhere between phase one and phase two with measured efforts at establishing phase three and four. Weakness in the performance of phase two prevents real success in phases five and six.

Somalia is at the end of phase 1 in January 2007.

Iran is stuck on phase three, four, and five and may require a return to phase one.

Afghanistan has regional phase two problems but is making progress in all other phases.

Pakistan is divided with the south completing phase one and two but struggling to implement other phases while the Northern Territories are stuck on phase one with an eye toward both Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Other Nations flirting with phase one problems include Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Sudan and Eritrea.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.