Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Brent Bozell III :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Pulitzer Racket
by Brent Bozell III
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who should John McCain pick as his running mate?














Conservatives often ponder why more young conservatives don't go into journalism. Here's one easy reason: The path to prizes and prestige doesn't come from fierce investigative probing into liberal sacred cows or sharp-eyed conservative commentary. It comes from pleasing liberals with stories that advance their agenda.

The 2007 Pulitzer Prizes must have been a sad affair, what with no major prize for exposing and ruining an anti-terrorism program, and no major natural disaster like Hurricane Katrina to blame on President Bush. But that doesn't mean the Pulitzers weren't typically political. After all, the panels of judges are stuffed with longstanding figures in the liberal media establishment.

Let's start with the Commentary prize, which was awarded to Cynthia Tucker of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The official Pulitzer Prize Board's press release hailed Tucker's "courageous, clear-headed columns that evince a strong sense of morality and persuasive knowledge of the community." Translation: She's liberal, and she hates George Bush.

Stephen Spruiell of National Review quickly found one recent column that complained: "There are plenty of unindicted liars walking the halls of the Bush White House. ... The Bush team knew they could never have sold American voters on an invasion of Iraq just because Saddam had illicit weapons. So they decided to distort, dissemble and lie."

What precisely is noteworthy in that? Hasn't that been said by every radical left-wing blogger with a modem?

What is noteworthy, perhaps, is the Pulitzer Prize committee standards. As with every other radical left-winger, Tucker can't deliver a shred of evidence to support the accusation of a presidential "lie."

Any conservative student who aspires to be a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist should really try another line of work. Here's the list since George Will won in 1977 and William Safire won in 1978: Charles Krauthammer in 1987, Paul Gigot in 2000 and Dorothy Rabinowitz in 2001. That's five conservatives in 30 years.

Three of the last five winners -- Tucker, Leonard Pitts and Colbert King -- were leftist black columnists. William Raspberry and E.R. Shipp have also won. But the Pulitzer Prize glorifiers have never honored Thomas Sowell or Walter Williams, or other black conservatives. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Hey, now...
Boy, this thing sure got personal in a hurry. I can't understand the personal attacks. I mean they add nothing to the discourse that is supposed to be going on here.

Let's look at signing statements. One poster implied that they are unconstitutional. Well, are they? Has any court ruled that they are unconstitutional? Has any other president used them? Is the hatred simply because Bush uses them "too much"? If they are unconstitutional, file a lawsuit and bring it to court.

I've read commentary by both liberals and conservatives. Typically if I put the "facts" from both columns together I can come up with a pretty good picture of the truth and where both "sides" come down on an issue.

Unfortunately, there are very few people that present all of the pertinent facts, especially in print. The reason for this is that all of the facts won't necessarily support the position of the writer. I understand this, really, I do. In a debate, I would never give ammunition to the "other side", rather I would hold it back and formulate some rational response in case my opponent brought it up.

I find some of the columns on TH rather trite and irritating, however, I haven't seen anything on KOS or HuffPost that is any better (usually worse). Of course, I do like to think for myself after researching and evaluating the evidence at hand. Maybe that is the problem, too many read too few pieces with an open mind.

Can conservatives even GET the job?
Like university teaching posts, journalist jobs are limited to the applicants' political persuasion.

Because the hiring is controlled by the 'loopy left', no 'rapacious right' applicant will get the job.

And who says there should be no litmus test? Oh yeah, that's the mantra of the loopies - except when it comes to hiring those on (IN?) the right.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.