Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Bruce Bartlett :: Townhall.com Columnist
Immigration Frustration
by Bruce Bartlett
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


One of the things that bothers me about the immigration bill is the view held in the White House and Congress that “something” must be done; the option of doing nothing is not an option. It is my experience that when this idea takes hold, it is almost inevitable that something bad will result.

In principle, I favor the free mobility of labor—just as I favor free trade and the free movement of capital. If we still had the kind of economy we had in the 19th century, in which the government was minuscule and there were no welfare programs, I would be inclined to say, let anyone in who wants to come here. The only way they are going to survive is by working their butts off, and if they are willing to do that then we want them.

This was, of course, the generally held view at that time. The United States welcomed immigrants from anywhere and everywhere. But beginning in the 1930s, this country began to become more and more of a welfare state. Many government programs now confer significant benefits upon those who produce nothing.

I’m not saying that illegal immigrants come to this country just for the governmental benefits, but the availability of such benefits reduces the burden of being illegal. The alternative of turning away people who may be seriously injured from hospital emergency rooms or children from schools simply is not viable. As long as they are here, such people will be accommodated.

To this, most immigration hardliners have a simple answer: send them back where they came from. Defend the border and deport illegals to the greatest extent possible. However, removing the 10 million or so illegal aliens now in the U.S. would be extraordinarily costly in terms of both money and liberty. I seriously doubt that most Americans would be willing to pay the taxes to make this happen or tolerate the intrusion on their own freedom—such as requiring a national identification card—that it would require.

So we are left with the current situation in which free immigration of the 19th century variety is untenable and complete elimination of illegal immigrants is impossible. It is this fact that supporters of the immigration bill are exploiting to claim that since something must be done, their approach is necessarily the best we can achieve.

But what about the option of doing nothing? Why this is this not considered a viable option is a mystery to me. It may be the least bad alternative.

Think about the current situation a little more carefully. Illegal aliens who come here do so primarily to work. I don’t deny that. They do a lot of crappy jobs that, frankly, few of the native born would do. And they do so for far less than it would cost to induce the native born to do such jobs. Moreover, aliens probably do a better job in many cases. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bruce Bartlett is a former senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis of Dallas, Texas. Bartlett is a prolific author, having published over 900 articles in national publications, and prominent magazines and published four books, including Reaganomics: Supply-Side Economics in Action.

Be the first to read Bruce Bartlett's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Where is Robert?
Robert:

I thought this bill was getting stronger and stronger and the forces that opposed it were growing dark. Oh and you also said I wasn't very good at counting votes when I said it would fail in the House and maybe not even get out of the Senate.

Well, Robert, I do know that 45 is less than 60 and that 45 is less than 50. So it seems perhaps that I can count better than you can at least.

You also said that I would share the same fate as my namesake did on June 5, 1942. Well, Robert it seems today is more akin to December 8, 1941 for you than it is June 6, 1942 for me. How does that seawater and bunker fuel taste?

Onceamarine:

Sha Ji Jing Hou is Mandarin Chinese; sha=kill ji=chicken jing=warn and hou=monkey..."to kill the chicken in order to warn the monkey." Akagi is Japanese basically translated as Red Castle. A common Japanese sirname, a place name in Honshu, the name of various Japanese warships (the most famous being the aircraft carrier sunk at Midway), a starship in Star Trek: TNG among other things.

Since I have never applied for WIC, I can't say if Hispanic is one of the options. Is this a form standard in all states or is the form produced by the states thus some states may have the checkbox and others not? Many (most?)government forms do in fact have the checkbox for Hispanic. If some WIC form doesn't, is a pretty trival point and I doubt it is based on some conspiracy to coverup the numbers of Hispanics using government programs--this is getting close to black helicopters territory.

Guess I did not express myself well
..and then lost my cool for a moment after the interjections about tea bags and bullets.

I thought you guys who understand LD, I didn't until a few days ago, would catch what I was doing. It was double talk for bullets. But with attached smoke screen.

Any way, my apologies for getting uppity for a moment. Been a bad day at black rock..

Never understood LD until very recently, because I always gave up after three or four lines. I just won't waste my patience on liberal losers. Then someone finally clued me as to what he is doing.. Now I understand, so maybe you can try to understand.

Will try to catch up with the rest of you. My intentions are good. You get tired and you make mistakes.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.