Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, March 28, 2008
Plainly for McCain
By Burt Prelutsky
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


Some mornings I wake up and, for a minute or two, I think that I must have been dreaming that there are conservatives who hate John McCain so much that, come November, they intend to stay home and let Bill Clinton’s wife or Jeremiah Wright’s surrogate nephew become president of the United States. But then I realize it’s not a dream, and that’s when the nightmare really begins.

Recently, I wrote a piece in which I stated a few of the reasons why I think McCain should be elected. I ended with a notion for a bumper-sticker: “Better an Imperfect Republican Than a Perfect Socialist”. But, still, I heard from a number of disgruntled right-wingers who vowed not to sully their principles by helping to elect a candidate they regarded as indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

I will repeat for the rest of you what I replied to these people. Granted, I don’t agree with Sen. McCain about amnesty for illegal aliens. But his position is no worse than that of the Democrats, and at least I’m confident that he’s opposed to the illegals having the right to vote in our elections. Democrats, as we all know, are for universal suffrage -- and that includes felons locked up in jails and people buried in cemeteries.

On the plus side of the ledger, McCain has never voted to increase taxes. Initially, he voted against Bush’s tax cuts, but that was because he wanted them tied to cuts in spending. However, when he lost that battle, he voted to make the tax cuts permanent. He is also leading the fight against earmarks.

This man, whom some conservatives regard as a RINO or even a closet liberal, is pro-life, pro-second amendment, pro-Israel and pro-military. Furthermore, unlike the Democrats, he recognizes that Islamic fundamentalists have declared war on us and every other democracy, and it’s not a war he intends to lose.

Some of those people who dismiss McCain do so because he helped create the Gang of 14. At the time, I, too, was irate with him. Because I was so angry with the Democrats who were using the power of the filibuster to block Bush’s judicial appointments, I was hoping the Republicans would resort to what was being referred to as the nuclear solution. But, much as I hate to admit it, I was wrong and McCain was right. The result of his strategy was that not only did Roberts and Alito both breeze into the Supreme Court, but because the nuclear solution wasn’t employed, Republicans in the future will have a chance to block the appointments of judicial radicals by left-wing presidents.

If I had to summarize the thinking of conservatives who oppose the election of John McCain, it’s that it took the disaster of Jimmy Carter’s presidency to usher in the golden era of Ronald Reagan. They feel that either the party will learn its lesson and become more conservative by 2012 or they will simply be forced to create a third party. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of "The Secret of Their Success: Interviews with Legends and Luminaries."

Be the first to read Burt Prelutsky's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Newt, Newt, Newt

People must realize that in the case of both JFK and Reagan, personality was more important than political brains. Just think, there is no way any one man from any party can do all the things needed to be done by a President, and he can not be an expert in the thousands of items that need attention.

The President will be in office about 35,000 hours per term, so if he solved one problem each hour, 24 hours a day, he couldn’t address them all.

What is needed is a good "front" man, who, with the help of others, will select a good staff, and they are the ones who do the key work. A front man who looks good, who presents the image, who looks like he knows what he is doing, can sell the project, but STAFF is the secret.

Everyone remembers JFK as a great President, but no one remembers why, and can't think of a reason, other than "Front Man." And if he has a good staff, then Front man can be more important than brains.

I say RWR had both.

Bring back the smoke-filled rooms. Then we can be assured that the man of the year will be Newt, Newt, Newt.

I am sad to say that Bush has almost changed my mind on some of this, because he did a terrible job of selecting staff, and the staff did what a staff is not suppose to be, they were YES men.

And a YES man is the last thing a CEO, even the CEO of the local drugstore needs.

constitutional protection?
McCain has already sponsored and passed McCain-Feingold, which destroyed the first amendment. So how can we trust him to protect the second amendment or any other constitutional right?

McCain can also be seen as pro-military only in comparison to Obama/Hillary. He came into office well after the Reagan wave of miltiary spending started, and McCain gave no protests during the 1990's gutting of our military by Clinton. In fact, his cooperation with Clinton was the foundation of his "maverick" label that he proudly wears.

Bottom line - if you want to present McCain as the lesser of two evils, go ahead. Just like Bush was a lesser evil than Gore and Kerry. But neither Bush nor McCain are conservatives.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!