Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Cal  Thomas :: Townhall.com Columnist
Civil Tongues
by Cal Thomas
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who should John McCain pick as his running mate?














In Abraham Lincoln's first Inaugural Address, the 16th president appealed to the "better angels of our nature."

In a recent speech in Prescott, Ariz., where Barry Goldwater launched his 1964 presidential campaign, Sen. John McCain made a similar appeal for this presidential campaign to avoid partisan sniping and instead engage in civil debate.

Lincoln's appeal to angels was overcome by the devils of the Civil War. And Lyndon Johnson routed Barry Goldwater in the 1964 election, in part because Goldwater was smeared as a warmonger.

Like Lincoln, McCain is trying to rise above the din and elevate the level of political discourse. In his Arizona speech he said, "Let us remember, we are not enemies. We are compatriots defending ourselves from a real enemy. We have nothing to fear from each other."

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has said similar things about jettisoning the polarization of the past and talking to each other with respect.

All of this sounds noble and the stuff of congeniality awards, but can it work beyond primary season? When the going gets tough, will one or both candidates be forced to launch verbal missiles? Can either or both candidates declare conscientious objector status and still hope to win a political war?

McCain and Obama will have people on their "side" dispensing plenty of rhetorical fire. Ed Schultz, a liberal talk-radio host, has called McCain a "warmonger." Schultz's comment came at an Obama fund-raiser in Grand Forks, N.D. Obama had not yet arrived in the room and apparently was not told of Schultz's remark because he made no reference to it in his speech or afterward (contrast this with McCain's immediate denunciation of anti-Obama comments by his supporters, which he deemed inappropriate).

The next day, an Obama spokeswoman issued a statement that sought to distance Obama from Schultz's comment. It said, "John McCain is not a warmonger and should not be described as such. He's a supporter of a war that Sen. Obama believes should never have been authorized and never been waged." Civility would have been better served had Sen. Obama spoken those words and not a campaign spokeswoman. Outrageous public comments deserve a public rebuke, not a press release. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Cal Thomas is co-author (with Bob Beckel) of the forthcoming book, "Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That is Destroying America".
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Cal Thomas' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Confusion about "civil discourse"
Civil discourse does not mean avoiding uncomfortable facts nor does it involve refusing to point out problems with someone's voting records, platforms, or logic.

The Liberal's warped definition of "civil discourse" is where no one says anything judgmental about any issue. That's the kind of intellectually dishonest tripe they feed our children in their failing closed-shop union schools. It leads to shoddy, relativistic thinking as exhibited by the above post of "Jack."

"Civil discourse" means that you leave the petty accusations and name-calling at the door. You speak to the issues and the record, not to the alleged motives of your opponent. That means you can't call John McCain a war-monger, or Barrack Obama a sleeper agent warped by prolonged exposure to Muslim and Black Liberation extremists. You can say that Barack Obama has staunchly opposed the right to life of unborn children and cite his voting record. You can say that John McCain hasn't exhibited serious dedication to combating illegal immigration and point to the Amnesty granted by his "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" bill.

Oddly enough, the sorts of arguments that are permissible under civil discourse are the sorts of position statements that Mitt Romney made back in the Republican Primary. His opponents and detractors then screamed bloody murder about how he was "going negative" and "attacking their character," and "how dare he!" and all that sack-sack garbage.

It is sad to see how eager people (even Republicans) are to fall back onto the tired Marxist deflections when the realm of civil discourse no longer favors their positions.

When emotionalism is on your side, argue to the emotions. When the record is on your side, argue about the record. When your record is unfavorable and emotions are running against you, create a distraction. :P

civil?
One person seems delutional and out of touch, the other deliberately misdirects. Which is worse?

Lincoln was not above calling a spade a spade, and if McCain can't do that, he should be in a support role, not a leadership position.

Oh, I still haven't heard a good reason for me as a conservative to vote for McCain. When someone can do that then I want to hear about him, until then why not address more pressing issues that are more than just spin?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: