Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, November 24, 2006
Chuck Colson :: Townhall.com Columnist
What happened AFTER the feast: The rest of the Thanksgiving story
by Chuck Colson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


Thanksgiving is just about my favorite holiday—a wonderful combination of family, faith, and American-style religious freedom. I love the story of those hardy Pilgrims, and I love eating turkey and pumpkin pie and gathering with family.

Many of us tend to think of the first Thanksgiving feast as the official end to all the Pilgrims’ difficulties. Wrong: Their survival would remain in jeopardy for years to come. And yet, no matter how difficult things became, they never failed to offer thanks to God.

As every school child knows, the Pilgrims arrived in the New World in the winter of 1620. As the freezing weeks passed, nearly half their number died.

It was a terrible time, but by spring, things began to improve. Friendly Indians helped the Pilgrims plant their crops. By October 1621, the fields yielded a harvest large enough to sustain the colony in the coming winter. The grateful Pilgrims invited their Indian friends to a three-day feast of thanksgiving to God.

That’s where the story typically ends—for us. But for the Pilgrims, the hardships went on. The next month, a ship arrived with thirty-five new colonists. But to the Pilgrims’ dismay, they brought no provisions. The entire colony was forced to go on half rations that winter. At one point, with food running out, everyone was forced onto a daily ration of just five kernels of corn.

As my friend Barbara Rainey writes in her new book, Thanksgiving: A Time to Remember, by spring, the colony was weakened by hunger and sickness. While the bay and creeks were full of fish, the Pilgrims’ nets had rotted. Were it not for shellfish, which could be dug by hand, they would have perished. Despite the great difficulties, they thanked God for His provision.

More ships arrived that year, usually bringing newcomers with no supplies. Pilgrim father William Bradford wrote in his journal that, given the poor harvest, it “appeared that famine must still ensue the next year also.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Chuck Colson was the Chief Counsel for Richard Nixon and served time in prison for Watergate-related charges. In 1976, Colson founded Prison Fellowship Ministries, which, in collaboration with churches of all confessions and denominations, has become the world's largest outreach to prisoners, ex-prisoners, crime victims, and their families.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Chuck Colson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Randomthoughts writes ...
"The current portrayal of Indians as uber-environmentalist and uber-spiritual peacekeepers is just uber-BS."

Perhaps randomthoughts should look at aurorawatcher's post (just above this one), which does a pretty good job of re-establishing some balance to this discussion. But even given that, as I reread the messages responding to Chuck Colson's naive mythology which he tries to pass off as "meaningful reflection", I fail to see where anyone has expressed a romantic view of Native Americans as "uber-environmentalists" or "uber spiritual peacekeepers".

They were neither. They were human beings whose historical and cultural experiences had culminated in a different mind-set than that of invading Europeans. For millenia Europeans had asked and addressed fundamental questions about life, the universe and everything. During that time, various groups of people, at various points in time, proposed that they had ("Eureka") found the "answer", and set about proving it to everyone else, and/or making everyone else accept it (or at least those within reach). Every new answer built upon older answers. Thus, as an example (and just to lighten the story a bit), the Winter Solstice becomes Christmas, commemorated by a white man with a great beard who lives at the North Pole with a bunch of elves and some reindeer and delivers gifts under a decorated fir tree to all the kids in the world -- even to kids that have never heard the story, never got the presents, and were quite surprised to learn they had been missing out for about 1000 years). We, many of whom are descendents of those people, continue to ask the same questions and continue to find new answers. The story doesn't end, boys and girls ... it just changes.

Well, the Native-Americans that European invaders (we, being descendents of them, of course call them "settlers") encountered, had asked the same questions but had just come up with a different set of answers. Every single thing that you can imagine or think about (other than the mysterious existence of pocket lint or where DOES that one sock go) was imagined and thought about by the indigenous people of the Western Hemisphere.

As human beings, though, they were no different than you or I. Some were helpful, some were arrogant, some were stupid, some were charismatic and some told good jokes and stories. Some were mistreated and abused, some inherited privilege and luxury. Some even already spoke English when the Pilgrims landed (Samoset and Squanto, to name two) ... gee, I wonder how that happened?

The tragedy is not in the gooey and warm-fuzzy Thanksgiving Tale that gets told ... no, that is a story that offers the promise of help, cooperation and coexistence in a cold and cruel world (and I continue to be amazed by how many uber-conservative patriots find joy and comfort in this story) ... but instead can be found in the "March of Progress" story that has been told and retold throughout human history. You know, where one group of people triumph over another and decide that not only can the other people no longer be tolerated, but they must be eliminated.

I sort of like the story of hope better than the story of triumph, but also realize that one person's hope may be much darker than mine.

Abuses enough on both sides
Coming down from my Wyndake forebears is the acknowledgement that the Five Nations of the Heron Indian Confederation attacked white settlers who had previously made agreements with neighboring tribes for land. Often the granting tribes were not Heron and therefore the agreement was technically not violated, but I doubt if the settlers saw the distinction. Yes, the United States government and the colonial governments before that violated treaties, but so did the Indians. My ancestors were farmers, but they were also warriors and they understood that they could get more from themselves if they stole white settlers' crops than if they just harvested their own crops. My great-great-great grandfather participated in the raid on Ft. Detroit that helped set off the French and Indian War. In doing so he was hundreds of miles out of his home territory acting as a paid mercenary for the French government.

We can whine about "bad whites, good Indians" but the fact is that nobody was or is good and there were abuses on both sides. Nobody apparently put a gun to the collective tribal head to force the Indians to help the Pilgrims. It is my understanding that the Pigrims arrived lacking resources, particularly many of them had been city dwellers and did not know how to farm. So it took them a few years to learn how. The Indians did a good thing in helping them learn how. The Pilgrims gave them a written language and faith in the One True God in return. While many may not consider that important, my ancestors certainly did -- eventually. My great-great grandfather became a trading post owner and an abolitionist, telling Americans he was "French Canadian". His daughters married prominent white businessmen and his sons went on to become a school teacher, a missionary and a district judge.

So, when people want me to be angry at one side or the other, I always wonder "which side?" I'm not just Indian. I'm also Irish, Swedish and Welch. I guess the Irish/Welch part could be angry at the Viking part for all that pillaging, burning and raping, but hey, that sounds a little like multiple personality disorder. Fact is, it's an old crime (or an act of charity, depending on your point of view) and none of us were a party to it. Maybe we should just leave the past in the past and get on with the present.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: