Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, October 26, 2007
David Limbaugh :: Townhall.com Columnist
D'Souza: Debunking Atheists
by David Limbaugh
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


My goal here is to convince as many of you as possible to read Dinesh D'Souza's compelling new book, "What's So Great About Christianity."

Since I wrote my book chronicling the war against Christianity in our culture, many atheists have come out of the closet to admit their hostility toward Christianity and formally declare war against it.

Anti-Christian books have cropped up like alien pods in "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," not only disputing Christianity but arguing that it is a societally destructive force.

I have often lamented that too many Christians have opted out of the culture wars, for varying reasons. Some are apathetic; others mistakenly believe that the biblical injunction to rejoice in their persecution also means we should roll over and surrender. Still others grossly underestimate the stakes involved and the fierce determination of their opponents.

Dinesh D'Souza is not among the AWOL Christians. And, unlike some other Christian apologists, he meets the enemy on his own turf, confronting and deconstructing his arguments rather than merely reciting Scripture that might be intelligible only to "the choir."

He presents a comprehensive yet concise apologetic of the Christian faith, facing head-on and answering the nagging intellectual obstacles to faith, not least the problem of human suffering. He also affirms the reliability of Scripture, the historicity of Jesus, the overwhelming proof of His resurrection and the uniqueness of Christ and the Christian religion.

But this book is more than the traditional, theological apologetic. It also contains a robust defense of Christianity's positive influence in history and debunks the revisionist disinformation condemning the religion.

"Christianity is the very root and foundation of Western civilization." Because of its premise that man is created in God's image, Christianity is foundational to our firm belief in man's dignity and our higher notions of morality, even many the secularists have plagiarized as their own. D'Souza warns that we cannot remove the Christian foundation without, ultimately, removing its values along with it.

Indeed, D'Souza shatters the fable that Christianity is responsible for most of the atrocities through the ages and documents that atheist regimes have been responsible for exponentially more deaths in the last few decades than have Christian regimes throughout history.

He also exposes the illogic of atheism's claim to moral superiority when it can't even offer a rational explanation for man's moral component. Nor can atheism explain man's consciousness. Apart from God, there is no accounting for either conscience or consciousness. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: LNC
No, I am saying that your contrived definition is meaningless.

You keep talking about my definition of faith. What is my definition? Please cite my posts.

"proper definition"

NTS. Context determines "proper" meaning. For example, what is the meaning of "bank" in the following sentence: "I went down to the bank"? You need context to determine that.

"Explain how one has faith in faith?"

I did.

"Faith is Jesus Christ is a meaningful statement as it has a subject of faith."

Do you believe that faith in Christ will attain salvation?

"I am signing off from this thread."

Was about to myself. Threads go on too long. Best to each say his piece, discuss a bit, then go off and think about it for next time. Hope there is a next time.

LNC
"Why do you consider this to be an answer rather than an explanation?"

It provides no explanation how God or this "intelligent agent" did anything.

"We see signs of design in the universe, why would we not explain it through a designer?"

Human designer, yes. The analogy doesn't imply anything else. Paley's watchmaker was man.

"I am using the definition that was used in the Bible – to be persuaded by evidence."

That's what I've been asking for. So far I've see subjective, personally persuasive evidence, not objective evidence, evidence that anyone neutrally without first having faith, would accept.

"Do you know of any atheists who are not naturalists/materialists/physicalists?"

Yes, many to whom those terms, using their specific philosophical meanings, do not apply. For example, I accept scientific findings based on their adherence to methodological materialism, not their adherence to unrelated metaphysical materialism.

"It is you and many other atheists who like to dodge definitions here for convenience sake."

Don't insult my intelligence, or yours. Discussion will end.

"Atheism by proper definition..."

NTS.

Socrates was the same sort of atheist as me.

"You still haven’t shown me that I use the same argument for and against science."

I cited two posts where you did.

"Yes, and you seem to argue the counter and I am looking for evidence not someone’s theory."

You want to claim external correlations exhibit causality then it is for you to show it, not me to show it's not. And you would need to argue with everyone form Aristotle to Popper. I'll stick with tradition.

"The problem with that explanation is that it uses causality to limit causality to perception."

Not what they said, they limit causality to reason, to explanation, not to what we perceive, which would be meaningless.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.