Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Dennis Prager :: Townhall.com Columnist
The culture war is about the authority of a book
by Dennis Prager
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


If you want to predict on which side an American will line up in the Culture War wracking America, virtually all you have to do is get an answer to this question: Does the person believe in the divinity and authority of the Five Books of Moses, the first five books of the Bible, known as the Torah? ("Divinity" does not necessarily mean "literalism.")

I do not ask this about "the Bible" as a whole because the one book that is regarded as having divine authority by believing Jews, Catholics, Protestants and Mormons, among others, is not the entire Bible, but the Torah. Religious Jews do not believe in the New Testament and generally confine divine revelation even within the Old Testament to the Torah and to verses where God is cited by the prophets, for example. But "Bible-believing" Christians and Jews do believe in the divinity of the Torah.

And they line up together on virtually every major social/moral issue.

Name the issue: same-sex marriage; the morality of medically unnecessary abortions; capital punishment for murder; the willingness to label certain actions, regimes, even people "evil"; skepticism regarding the United Nations and the World Court; strong support for Israel. While there are exceptions -- there are, for example, secular conservatives who share the Bible-believers' social views -- belief in a God-based authority of the Torah is as close to a predictable dividing line as exists.

That is why one speaks of Judeo-Christian values, but not of Judeo-Christian theology. Torah-believing Jews and Torah-believing Christians have very different theological beliefs, but they agree on almost all values issues -- largely because they share a belief in the divinity of the same text.

Many members of all these different religions have found it quite remarkable how similar their values are to those of members of these other religions. An evangelical Protestant who might regard Mormonism as nothing more than a heretical cult will find himself seated next to Mormons at a rally on behalf of the Boy Scouts. An Orthodox rabbi who might never set foot in a church will join a panel of Christians in opposing the redefining of marriage. And so on.

Very often the dividing line in America is portrayed as between those who believe in God and those who don't. But the vast majority of Americans believe in God, and belief in God alone rarely affects people's values. Many liberals believe in God; many conservatives do. What matters is not whether people believe in God but what text, if any, they believe to be divine. Those who believe that He has spoken through a given text will generally think differently from those who believe that no text is divine. Such people will usually get their values from other texts, or more likely from their conscience and heart.

That a belief or lack of belief in the divinity of a book dating back over 2,500 years is at the center of the Culture War in America and between religious America and secular Europe is almost unbelievable. But it not only explains these divisions; it also explains the hatred that much of the Left has for Jewish, Protestant, Catholic and Mormon Bible-believers.

For the Left, such beliefs are irrational, absurd and immoral.

Which is exactly how most conservatives regard most leftist beliefs, such as: there is nothing inherently superior in a child being raised by a mother and father rather than by two fathers or two mothers; men and women are not basically different, but only socially influenced to be different; Marxism was scientific; that the Soviet Union was not an evil empire; it was immoral for Israel to bomb Saddam Hussein's nuclear reactor; morality is relative to the individual or society; there is no moral judgment to be made about a woman aborting a healthy human fetus solely because she doesn't want a baby at this time; material poverty, not moral poverty, causes violent crime, etc.

This divide explains why the wrath of the Left has fallen on those of us who lament the exclusion of the Bible at a ceremonial swearing-in of an American congressman. The Left wants to see that book dethroned. And that, in a nutshell, is what the present civil war is about.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dennis Prager is a radio show host, contributing columnist for Townhall.com, and author of 4 books including Happiness Is a Serious Problem: A Human Nature Repair Manual.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dennis Prager's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: God not consistent?
WRH Bill writes:

One problem with your view is that the "universal and absolute values" presented in the Torah are not consistently treated as "universal and absolute" even within the Bible itself. On occasion, the God of the Bible violates those "universal values" himself and encourages his followers to do so as well. (I sometimes think the First Commandment ought to be preceded by a Zeroth Commandment, "Do as I say, not as I do.")

Columbo responds:

I hope you will forgive me for “cutting-in” on your conversation, but your last blog leaves me wondering just what you are talking about when you say “universal and absolute values are not treated consistently in the Bible.” Would you be so kind as to a) define what you mean by a universal and absolute value in the Bible, and b) give sufficient examples from the Bible to demonstrate your claim?

In the interest of time and space, I want to say up-front that if you are going to use such an example as “thou shalt not kill” (Ex. 21:13) juxtaposed with “thus says the Lord go … and kill each one his brother and each one his neighbor and each one his kindred …” (Ex. 20:27), well either you are over-simplifying language, philosophy and theology, or you have considered Christian theodicies [attempts to reconcile the existence of a benevolent God with the existence of evil], and you reject them. If the former, then I’d be quite willing to disabuse you of the notion that God is somehow inconsistent. If the latter, then you have chosen to ignore or discount the fact that the last two millennia have witnessed a host of great thinkers – Augustine, Aquinas, C.S. Lewis, to name a few familiar ones – who argued forcefully for those theodicies. If you are simply ignorant of their thinking (which I doubt, as you quoted from one of Lewis’ better essays against naturalism), then I respectfully offer that you would do well to consider their arguments. If on the other hand, you understand the case for a benevolent God, and you reject it, would you care to explain why?

At any rate, we all agree that you are free here in America to verbalize whatever foolishness or blasphemy you wish, but if you don’t wish to appear foolish or simplistic, may I suggest that you would do well to back-up your careless dismissal of Christian (and Jewish) theology with a bit more detail. I for one would love to hear your reasons for what appears to me to be anti-religious dogma.

Regards,

Columbo

Response to: No, WRH, Bill, that's not..
Pcon-T posted, responding to me:
The values in the Torah, which is what Prager says the culture war is about, says we should not favor the powerful out of fear or awe, nor favor the weak out of sympathy or compassion. Rather, justice should be blind, and rule according to universal standards of treating everyone as we would expect to be treated in those given circumstances.

Believers in the Torah believe these values are universal and absolute because they were commanded by a source that is EQUALLY universal and absolute, a source outside of nature. Nature itself has its own moral code of "might makes right", and knows nothing of morality.

If you, as an atheist, or "non-theist", believe these values are universal and absolute, even though you can't attribute them to any universal and absolute source, well...let's just say we're glad you're suspending disbelief and buying into the universality of these values anyway."

One problem with your view is that the "universal and absolute values" presented in the Torah are not consistently treated as "universal and absolute" even within the Bible itself. On occasion, the God of the Bible violates those "universal values" himself and encourages his followers to do so as well. (I sometimes think the First Commandment ought to be preceded by a Zeroth Commandment, "Do as I say, not as I do.")

I also dispute the idea that the values of the Torah/Bible originate solely with the Bible and were never thought of by any other culture or religious/philosophical text. And as a witness, I call that notorious atheist and anti-Christian bigot, C. S. Lewis. (I'm being sarcastic, of course, about the famous defender of the Christian faith.) In one of his books, "The Abolition of Man," Lewis pointed out that there is a core of moral values shared by many different cultures and religions. In an appendix to that book, Lewis laid out what he called "the Tao" (Chinese for "the way") and showed how moral rules found in the Bible are directly paralleled by non-Judeo-Christian sources (pre-Christian pagan epics, Chinese Confucianism, etc.) from around the world. Lewis was a devout Christian but he wasn't arrogant enough to think that his faith "invented" morality.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.