Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, July 11, 2008
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
For Business, Shortchange Is More Like It
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama likes to use the word "investment" in his campaign speech on getting the U.S. economy growing again, but it means something very different for him than it does for most people.

To the average American, making an investment means putting one's money into an asset or business enterprise that will return a dividend or interest payment or capital gain -- something that will grow in value over time.

The lifeblood of the American economy and the source of all jobs and growth is capital -- investment capital -- that comes from people who are both workers and investors. Each benefits from the other. But in Obama's speeches, "investment" is a euphemism for government spending -- and it plays an all too prominent role in his platform. As for the word "capital" -- without which there can be no investment to build or expand businesses and create jobs -- that doesn't turn up at all in his economic speeches. More on that later.

The freshman senator from Illinois told an audience in St. Louis, Mo., that "the answer to our fiscal problems is not to shortchange investments that will help our families get ahead -- investments that are vital to our long-term growth as a nation."

But what Obama calls "investments" sound like government giveaways -- taking money from some Americans to give to others -- otherwise known as income redistribution. He's planning a lot of giveaways. Here are four of them:

-- Giveaway No. 1: "A second stimulus package that provides energy-rebate checks for working families ..."

-- Giveaway No. 2: "Establish a fund in the Treasury to help (subprime mortgage) families avoid foreclosure."

-- Giveaway No. 3: "Increased assistance for states that have been hard hit by the economic downturn." These are state governments that spent all their money when times were good, but face deficits when times are bad.

-- Giveaway No. 4: Fifty percent of the first $1,000 saved by "working families" earning less than $75,000 "deposit(ed) directly into your account" by the federal government.

Whatever the merits of these spending programs, they are not going to reinvigorate the economy or create any private-sector jobs. Obama talks a lot about creating jobs, but his speech is disturbingly hostile to wealthy people, who do the most investing. He also harbors no fondness for the notion of using tax incentives to boost capital investment -- i.e., venture capital and risk capital -- to grow the economy, which in turn will create more jobs. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Giveaway No. 3:
"Increased assistance for states that have been hard hit by the economic downturn."

Not (at all) coincidentally, these are all states that are wholly owned and operated by liberal democrats. It is the peculiar hallmark of their administrations.

Obama will renege on his promises
If Obama does as he promises, he will l be a one time president and the Democrats will lose the congress.

What Obama is actually going to have to do is raise GDP, revenue being a constant 19.6% of GDP regardless of tax rate. If he fails here, the dollar and American power will plummet.

He can raise GDP by spending , and pay for it by borrowing or the printing press. Either would accelerate inflation. But then the world economy might collapse.

The safe way to promote rapidly increasing GDP is the permanent demise of the estate and gift taxes, followed in reducing effectiveness by a reduction in the corporate, capital gains, and dividend tax rates.

The death tax saps incentive. Ending the death tax would: (1) lessen the diversion of taxable into nontaxable assets - from funding state and federal governments into funding private governments; (2) dampen the diversion of investment capital to insurance and spendthrift spending and prevent the selling of productive assets as bargain prices to pay taxes; and (4) end the diversion of men from their highly productive desk chairs to the rocking chair; in each instance thereby exponentially increasing jobs, GDP, and tax revenues.

Much the same considerations support reduction in corporate, capital gains, and dividend taxes. Zeroing or reducing corporate taxes to 15% would greatly expand investment and exponentially increase American jobs, GDP, and tax revenues. Ditto capital gains and dividends.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.