Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Ed Feulner :: Townhall.com Columnist
U.N. Leaders: Wrong on Rights
by Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How much of the Republican convention did you watch?




You know you’re doing a good job if you upset the right people -- such as petty bureaucrats at the United Nations.

Recently, an online publication reported that UN Television had purchased six high-definition video cameras, but couldn’t use them because it had failed to purchase lenses for them. Worse, Inner City Press reported, the U.N. building isn’t even wired for such cameras.

When a reporter went to question the woman in charge of UN Television, she startled him with a question of her own: “Do you work for The Heritage Foundation?”

Well, no. But those of us who do work at Heritage appreciate the back-handed compliment. It shows that the agency is well (if not painfully) aware of our work, which has exposed countless examples of waste, fraud and abuse at the U.N. over the years. Why do we do it? Because it’s American tax dollars being squandered by U.N. mismanagement.

The problems don’t stop with incompetence. Take the case of Nicaraguan Reverend Miguel D’Escoto Brockmann, who was elected the next president of the U.N. General Assembly. He may have risen to power in 2008, but his ideas seem stuck in the 1960s.

D’Escoto has called the United States “the greatest enemy of the right of self-determination of peoples” and has declared Americans to be “the most ignorant people around the world.” Strong words from a man who served as foreign minister during the Sandinista dictatorship of Daniel Ortega in the 1980s.

Ironically, it’s D’Escoto’s homeland and his soon-to-be employer that increasingly block freedom and democracy.

“Nicaragua is rapidly emerging as a key friend and an ally of some of the most odious regimes on the face of the earth,” observes Nile Gardiner, director of Heritage’s Thatcher Center, and Ray Walser, Heritage’s expert on Latin America. Gardiner and Walser document Nicaragua’s ties with Iran and Venezuela, two nations that adamantly oppose American interests: “The presence of one of its key political figures at the head of the U.N. General Assembly is a demonstration of the organization’s callous disregard for the principles of liberty and freedom on the world stage.”

Amazingly, even as the U.N. wastes money by the bucketload and puts unrepentant leftists into positions of power, it wants to spend even more money on an investigation of supposed human-rights abuses -- in the U.S. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: One last thing..well two really
Roopsag:

The UN actually serves the US interest. If it didn't exist, it would be the US called on to go to every hotspot on the planet--do you really want to waste your blood and treasure in the Solomons (again) or in East Timor, sitting on the Indian-Pakistani border, in Cyprus guarding the Green Line? Monitoring the peace in Cambodia? The UN does a good job at monitoring peace when both sides want peace--see Cambodia as an example and Cyprus. What it is very bad at is making peace when one side or the other (or both/all sides) doesn't--Bosnia and Somalia are prime examples. The UN needs to stay out of the peace making business, but it is very good at peace monitoring, holding elections, refugee services, etc. It is a bloated bureaucracy, but so are many US programs. As bad as the UN is, having no UN would be worse for the US.

As for a new UN--McCain has suggested creation of a league of democracies to act when and where the UN can't or won't.

Oh Vic
The UN HQ sits on international territory.

And Neal:

As for expelling all nations from the UN that do not uphold the UN's charter, well you'd have to expel the US too and all but about 20 countries that sit in the UN. The US continues to deny support for Taiwan's entry into the UN--even calling a referendum held this year in Taiwan for Taiwan to seek UN admission under the name of "Taiwan" provactive. See Chapter II, Article 4 of the UN charter.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.