Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Monday, November 13, 2006
Gregory Koukl :: Townhall.com Columnist
"Morally Velocitized"
by Gregory Koukl
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Who should John McCain pick as his running mate?














I first heard the term "velocitized" in high school driver's ed. When a driver accelerates from, say, 30 to 60 miles per hour and settles in, he gets acclimated to his new speed and loses his sense of velocity. It doesn't feel as if he's moving any faster at 60 than he was at 30.

This is dangerous on the highway, but it's deadly when it happens to the moral consciousness of a culture. Years ago, theologian Francis Schaeffer said that what was unthinkable yesterday is thinkable today, and ordinary and commonplace tomorrow. In other words, when a culture's decline in values begins to pick up speed, it becomes velocitized.

Keep that in mind as the Supreme Court considers the oral arguments that were presented Nov. 8 on the constitutionality of the Partial - Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

Remember also that calling a procedure an abortion doesn't magically make it one.

Abortion happens to a child inside her mother's womb. With partial - birth abortion, however, the child is not on the inside of her mother when she's killed; she's mostly on the outside.

The baby is delivered feet first until only her little head remains in the birth canal. The doctor then takes a pair of curved Metzenbaum scissors, punctures the base of the child's skull, suctions out the brain tissue with a catheter, then completes the delivery of the baby's corpse.

Picture it. This is not an abortion. The living baby hangs helplessly before our eyes, no interpretation required. No room for weak euphemisms here. This is infanticide with the baby's head covered. That the Supreme Court must consider the legitimacy of a federal law forbidding this barbarism marks the velocity of our moral descent.

Justice Ginsburg, apparently, can't picture it. To her eyes, abortion is imperiled, not a child. "Anything about infanticide, babies, all that, is just beside the point," she said during the hearings, "because what this bans is a method of abortion."

Ginsburg understands what is at stake. If this ban is supported, then late - term abortion rights seem much less credible. Dismembering a living child inside her mother's womb (D&E abortion) seems just as bad as suctioning a baby's brains when she’s mostly outside her mother's womb (D&X "partial - birth" abortion). Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Gregory Koukl is founder and president of Stand to Reason, an organization devoted to a thoughtful and engaging defense of classical Christianity in the public square. He is also a radio talk show host and author of Relativism—Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air.

Be the first to read Gregory Koukl's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Ted Kennedy
Is anesthetized against any such pangs of conscience by an ocean of booze. He is directly responsible for the death of Mary Jo Kopechne yet he shamelessly preaches about "social injustice" to the rest of us. The death of a baby wouldn't bother him nearly as much as the inconvenience of caring for one. He's a self-embalmed container for his own enormous ego, and he's only visible today because of his last name and his penchant for stirring the liberal pot.

If "social justice" is so wonderful, why can't it be electively deducted from our paychecks, instead of it being mandatory? You'd think such a wonderful idea would be supported by a swarm of voluntary contributors, rather than coerced from unwitting and begrudging wage earners.

Murder is plainly evil, yet pro-abortion people think that pro-lifers are evil. Whatever happened to evil? Nobody seems to understand it anymore.

sedonaman / Re: Kennedy, Ginsburg
sedonaman writes: “One of those who suggested she didn't really see what she said she saw was Sen. Ted Kennedy.”

That is a truly awful thing to read, sedonaman. I’m not a squeamish person, but I really didn’t want to read from “The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping” on to the end. I did though. And I looked at the pictures.

Perhaps Senator Kennedy (and Justice Ginsburg, for that matter) would benefit from witnessing the procedure performed live on closed-circuit TV. Make it a 70” big screen HDTV, with Beethoven’s 5th playing at ear-splitting volume levels, a la “Clockwork Orange”.

That might be the only way to communicate with Ted Kennedy about anything, come to think of it…

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.