Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, May 03, 2007
Hugh Hewitt :: Townhall.com Columnist
“The Enemy Has Successfully Denied The Western Media Access To The Battlefields”
by Hugh Hewitt
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who should John McCain pick as his running mate?














“The Enemy Has Successfully Denied The Western Media Access To The Battlefields”: The Case For Milblogging

When Marine Corps General James Mattis remarked to a reporter on December 23rd of last year that the enemy had “successfully denied the Western media access to the battlefields” of Iraq, he was right. But the enemy had not denied the homefront information from those battlefields because of the vast network of computers and blogs operated by the men and women in uniform serving in the theater who kept pumping out crucial information to their families, friends and admirers back in the States.

When four months earlier General John Abizaid had told me in an interview that “it would be a huge help for everybody if we started talking about our enemies out here, what they stand for, what they want, what their vision of the world is, why they're dangerous, and how this is a worthy fight to fight at this level now, rather than letting it wait to get worse,” I realized that thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines were doing just that via their milblogs such as MudvilleGazette and their e-mails to civilian bloggers such as Powerline, Instapundit, CaptainsQuarters, Michelle Malkin and me.

The MSM might have been denied the battlefield because of the risks involved –though some like Michael Yon, Bill Roggio, and John Burns were not deterred—and the anti-Bush media might have refused to talk about our enemies or the worthiness of the fight, the men and women of the American military never stopped reporting on the war or describing in detail the nature of the enemy or the ebb and flow of the battle.

It was the first war in which the military itself was providing the data, and not through the press officers though they have mostly tried to help the public understand the stakes, but via the privates and sergeants as well as the officers at the lower ranks. The milbloggers, in short, have done an extraordinary job of keeping the home front not only safe but also informed. I cannot imagine what the public would think of the war if this vital flow of information –solid, reliable, realistic information—had not been flowing back to the homefront for relay and rereading by the millions of Americans skeptical of the MSM’s ability or willingness to report on the war in anything approaching an objective fashion.

Now, in a stunning admission of almost impossible to believe incompetence, the Army has announced henceforth the blogs will fall silent unless the entry has been preapproved. E-mails to civilians as well. In short, the Army is abruptly ending operations on a key portion of the battlefield –the fight for American public opinion.

Matt at Blackfive has been most eloquent about the absurdity of this policy, though the posts denouncing it across the blogosphere have been growing by the hour. Appearing on my program, Alabama Senator Richard Shelby declared the obvious reaction of most people when he said “I think we ought to hear from the soldiers.” “We should not try to shut up our soldiers,” he added. “They’re in harm’s way, they’re carrying the brunt of this, and their families, and we should support them, and we should listen to them.”

“Operational Security” concerns are said to be behind the ban, but I know of no breach that has led to an injury or a death, and as retired Marine Corps Mike McBride said on my program, some casualties would be acceptable in light of the huge benefit the milblogs and e-mails are bringing to the war effort. That’s for the professionals to decide, but an out-of-the-blue lightening bolt of censorship just doesn’t strike those of us who have been reading the milbloggers since before the war began as an expression of concern over security. Rather, it seems to most of us to be an act of exasperation by senior military brass with a new development not encountered before. Troops have always grumbled, and troops have always written home, but troops have never had this kind of reach or volume before. It looks like the patience of someone grew too thin, and in a very ill-conceived and sudden move, a key bit of battleground was simply ceded to the bad guys.

Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Hugh Hewitt is a law professor, broadcast journalist, and author of several books including A Mormon in the White House?: 110 Things Every American Should Know about Mitt Romney.

Be the first to read Hugh Hewitt's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Rules of Engagement indeed
"I cannot help but wonder what things would be like had we browned out media coverage of the AO, allowed our troops to do their jobs, unfettered by politics and manipulation of information both in the AO and back at home."

Agreed. The administration has been trying to fight two wars at once. The war on radical Islam and the war on the president. Unfortunately the latter is not being fully engaged either. Just as we are allowing our foreign enemies tactics we will not allow ourselves, so too with the propaganda war being waged in the media.

As the post from karennkc demonstrates, progress is not given any airtime, while setbacks are trumpeted across front page after front page. The war we are fighting in the ME is a kind of war never fought before. There is no precedent, no "plan book" to go by, and we are trying to succeed with precious little help. The least our own politicians can do is to keep to themselves anything which will harm our efforts and hamper success.

They keep saying that we need to "change course", when our generals have been making course adjustments all along. Apparently the only acceptable course change to the liberals is 180 degrees exactly, no more, no less, because that would be less than full retreat.

But as Marine Corps Major Ben Connable has written, "We can fail only if the false imagery of quagmire takes hold and our national political will is broken. In that event, both the Iraqi people and the American troops will pay a long-term price for our shortsighted delusion."


fyi - rules of engagement issues
there is a push from mainstream media to fight a humanitarian war, i.e. no civilian casualties.

this is, of course, impossible. the military is hamstrung. they cannot fire unless actively fired upon. consequently, there would be militia with their machine guns in full sight walk confidently through the street.
the terrorists know we can't engage and we know they know.

it is time to fight the war as a war. my dad and uncle fought in WWII. anyone caught fighting out of uniform was shot on the spot. if fire came from a building or an area of the city. that city was turned to rubble. that is what fighting a war is supposed to be like.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: