Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
John Stossel :: Townhall.com Columnist
Big, Big Government
by John Stossel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who should John McCain pick as his running mate?














Two weeks ago, U.S. drug agents launched raids on 11 medical-marijuana centers in Los Angeles County. The U.S. attorney's office says they violated the laws against cultivation and distribution of marijuana.

Whatever happened to America's federal system, which recognized the states as "laboratories of democracy"?

According to the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, 11 states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington) have eliminated the penalties for physician-approved possession of marijuana by seriously ill patients. In those states people with AIDS and other catastrophic diseases may either grow their own marijuana or get it from registered dispensaries.

But the U.S. government says its drug laws trump the states' laws, and in 2005, the Supreme Court agreed.

This is not the way it was supposed to work. The constitutional plan presented in the Federalist Papers delegated only a few powers to the federal government, with the rest reserved to the states. The system was hailed for its genius. Instead of having decisions made in the center -- where errors would harm the entire country -- most policies would be determined in a decentralized environment. A mistake in California would affect only Californians. New Yorkers, Ohioans, and others could try something else. Everyone would learn and benefit from the various experiments.

It made a lot of sense. It still does. Too bad the idea is being tossed on the trash heap by big-government Republicans and their DEA goons.

Drug prohibition -- like alcohol prohibition -- is a silly idea, as the late free-market economist Milton Friedman often pointed out. Something doesn't go away just because the government decrees it illegal. It simply goes underground. Then a black market creates worse problems. Since sellers cannot rely on police to protect their property, they arm themselves, form gangs, charge monopoly prices, and kill their competitors. Buyers steal to pay the high prices.

Alcohol prohibition in the 1920s gave America Al Capone and organized crime. Drug prohibition has given us South American and Asian cartels that finance terrorism. Even the government admits that the heroin trade bankrolls terrorists. Prohibition's exorbitant black-market prices make that possible. In the United States, drug prohibition spawns gangs that are sometimes better armed than the police. Drug prohibition does more harm than drugs. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Stossel is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read John Stossel's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: State Laboratories of Democracy
Stossel asks, 'Whatever happened to America's federal system, which recognized the states as "laboratories of democracy"?'

History is not my forte, but I think the concept of the several states being actual, independent, sovereign entities went out the window with the Civil War.

Before the Civil War, they were "states". Like little countries. Completely sovereign unto themselves, with only the agreement in the Constitution binding them to the other states.

Simply from the perspective of States' Rights, the South was Right. They should have had the right and privilege to peaceably leave the United States any time they wanted to. In forcing the issue, at the cost of many millions of lives, Lincoln rammed home the concept that the States were *not* sovereign, but were instead *subservient* to the Federal Government.

They are no longer "states" in the traditional sense that the word originally meant. Today they should be more properly called "provinces", the way they're called in other countries such as Canada.

When the Constitution was written, they wrote in items that prevented the several states from charging each other tariffs and duties for inter-state trade. At the time, that was quite commonplace, and each state thought of itself as a -- well, as a STATE. Like the State of France, or the State of Italy, and charging fees for trade was no biggie. In agreeing to the Constitution, they did not intend to give up ALL their sovereignty. They only wanted to have a stronger unified government, more able to protect all from enemies abroad -- together we stand, or divided we fall.

Nowadays, the very concept of, say, California and Arizona being two different "countries" is utterly foreign to everyone. We can't even consider such an idea, it being so foreign to the modern mind. So naturally, local politics consists mainly of getting more and more local benefits from Sugar Daddy (formerly Uncle) Sam.

Laboratories of Democracy? Ha! Not anymore.

The Bill of Rights used to guarantee that whatever wasn't given to the Federal Government was reserved to the States, or to the People. Nowadays, it's the other way around -- the People and the States can only do what the Federal Government says they can do.

Who are the "drug runners"?
Ever wonder why we appear to have been so unsuccessful in fighting the War on Drugs?

Perhaps it is because there are a lot of people in high places benefitting from drug-running. You remember Mena, AK, right? If not, it's easy to look up. Why wasn't Clinton investigated more thoroughly on THIS, instead of some stupid affair with Monica Lewinsky? Personally, I wonder if it is because those profiting sit on BOTH sides of the aisle.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.