Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Beware Candidates' Promises
By John Stossel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are you struggling to keep up with rising gas prices?


Watching presidential candidates promise to "fix" America fills me with dread.

A reason I have this reaction is that I've been doing reports for "20/20" on previous politicians' campaigns to "fix" child sex abuse.

Sexual abuse was always a problem, but in the early 1990s, something changed. Several pretty white girls were victimized at a time when the 24-hour cable-news cycle was hungry for new drama. Heinous child molestation became the big story. So publicity-seeking politicians clamored for new laws.

One result of their campaign was Megan's Law, which requires police to notify neighbors when a sex offender lives nearby. States were also ordered to establish registries so that when sex offenders are released from prison or put on probation, everyone can keep track of them.

It does seem important to know when a dangerous person lives nearby, but these laws have freedom-killing effects that go well beyond their proponents' good intentions.

For last week's "20/20", I interviewed sex offender Frank Rodriquez. Because he admits he repeatedly had sex with a child, he will forever be listed on the Texas sex-offender registry. His name and picture are posted next to those of murderers of children and a man who molested 200 kids.

But Frank's "crime" was different. He had sex with his high-school girlfriend. She says it was her idea.

Nikki was a 15-year-old freshman when Frank was a senior. Nikki's mom knew that Nikki and Frank were intimate and even took her to Planned Parenthood for birth-control pills. But her mother didn't like the relationship, and one night, she and Nikki got into a fight. Her mom went to the police and filed charges against Frank because the age of consent in Texas is 17.

The next morning, she decided to drop the charges, but the police said it was too late. They charged Frank with sexual assault of a child.

Frank's court-appointed defense attorney told him he had two bad choices: plead guilty and accept seven years' probation or go to trial and possibly spend 20 years in prison.

So he took the plea bargain. It kept him out of prison, but it gave him a different kind of life sentence: life as a registered sex offender.

Frank had to move out of his family home because his 12-year-old sister lived there. He lived by himself in a trailer. He needed permission from a judge just to go to his brother's high school football games.

And above all he was told, "Stay away from your girlfriend." Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Stossel is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read John Stossel's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: skiddles -- not too late --
"Why was the Mother not prosecuted for something in this case - contributing to the deliquency.. child endangerment? She was aware of the detail of the relationship, and knew it was sexual."

Probably because, like most people, she wasn't aware that the state had taken on the role of the Gestapo when it comes to underaged sex.

She may or may not have liked the idea that her kid was having sex at that age, but didn't think it was a big enough deal.

This is true in many cases. I a similar case in Georgia where even the jury who found the 17-year-old guilty were *shocked* to learn what the penalty was. Without intending to, they essentially robbed the boy of 20 years of his life. All because he had consensual sex with a girl who was only a year younger.

Indeed, had the event taken place 2 weeks later, after her birthday, she would have been "legal".

-----

"Also, I am generally in favor of these laws, but I do think that if the two involved later marry and are in a stable relationship, then there is probably no need to register."

I don't see what marrying has to do with anything.

The point is, this person is NOT a danger to society in ANY form or fashion. There is no reason to penalize him and people like him, for the rest of his natural life.

This is late but
Why was the Mother not prosecuted for something in this case - contributing to the deliquency.. child endangerment? She was aware of the detail of the relationship, and knew it was sexual.

It seems like a double standard.

Also, I am generally in favor of these laws, but I do think that if the two involved later marry and are in a stable relationship, then there is probably no need to register.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.