Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Monday, December 04, 2006
The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness
By Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr.,a forensic psychiatrist, explains the madness of liberalism in his new book The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. You can read an excerpt below, and read more at his website libertymind.com.

Like all other human beings, the modern liberal reveals his true character, including his madness, in what he values and devalues, in what he articulates with passion. Of special interest, however, are the many values about which the modern liberal mind is not passionate: his agenda does not insist that the individual is the ultimate economic, social and political unit; it does not idealize individual liberty and the structure of law and order essential to it; it does not defend the basic rights of property and contract; it does not aspire to ideals of authentic autonomy and mutuality; it does not preach an ethic of self-reliance and self-determination; it does not praise courage, forbearance or resilience; it does not celebrate the ethics of consent or the blessings of voluntary cooperation. It does not advocate moral rectitude or understand the critical role of morality in human relating. The liberal agenda does not comprehend an identity of competence, appreciate its importance, or analyze the developmental conditions and social institutions that promote its achievement. The liberal agenda does not understand or recognize personal sovereignty or impose strict limits on coercion by the state. It does not celebrate the genuine altruism of private charity. It does not learn history’s lessons on the evils of collectivism.

What the liberal mind is passionate about is a world filled with pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice. Those who occupy this world are “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed.” They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited and victimized. They bear no responsibility for their problems. None of their agonies are attributable to faults or failings of their own: not to poor choices, bad habits, faulty judgment, wishful thinking, lack of ambition, low frustration tolerance, mental illness or defects in character. None of the victims’ plight is caused by failure to plan for the future or learn from experience. Instead, the “root causes” of all this pain lie in faulty social conditions: poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: “Big Business,” “Big Corporations,” “greedy capitalists,” U.S. Imperialists,” “the oppressors,” “the rich,” “the wealthy,” “the powerful” and “the selfish.”

The liberal cure for this endless malaise is a very large authoritarian government that regulates and manages society through a cradle to grave agenda of redistributive caretaking. It is a government everywhere doing everything for everyone. The liberal motto is “In Government We Trust.” To rescue the people from their troubled lives, the agenda recommends denial of personal responsibility, encourages self-pity and other-pity, fosters government dependency, promotes sexual indulgence, rationalizes violence, excuses financial obligation, justifies theft, ignores rudeness, prescribes complaining and blaming, denigrates marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and rebels against the duties of citizenship. Through multiple entitlements to unearned goods, services and social status, the liberal politician promises to ensure everyone’s material welfare, provide for everyone’s healthcare, protect everyone’s self-esteem, correct everyone’s social and political disadvantage, educate every citizen, and eliminate all class distinctions. With liberal intellectuals sharing the glory, the liberal politician is the hero in this melodrama. He takes credit for providing his constituents with whatever they want or need even though he has not produced by his own effort any of the goods, services or status transferred to them but has instead taken them from others by force.

It should be apparent by now that these social policies and the passions that drive them contradict all that is rational in human relating, and they are therefore irrational in themselves. But the faulty conceptions that lie behind these passions cannot be viewed as mere cognitive slippage. The degree of modern liberalism’s irrationality far exceeds any misunderstanding that can be attributed to faulty fact gathering or logical error. Indeed, under careful scrutiny, liberalism’s distortions of the normal ability to reason can only be understood as the product of psychopathology. So extravagant are the patterns of thinking, emoting, behaving and relating that characterize the liberal mind that its relentless protests and demands become understandable only as disorders of the psyche. The modern liberal mind, its distorted perceptions and its destructive agenda are the product of disturbed personalities.

As is the case in all personality disturbance, defects of this type represent serious failures in development processes. The nature of these failures is detailed below. Among their consequences are the liberal mind’s relentless efforts to misrepresent human nature and to deny certain indispensable requirements for human relating. In his efforts to construct a grand collectivist utopia—to live what Jacques Barzun has called “the unconditioned life” in which “everybody should be safe and at ease in a hundred ways”—the radical liberal attempts to actualize in the real world an idealized fiction that will mitigate all hardship and heal all wounds. (Barzun 2000). He acts out this fiction, essentially a Marxist morality play, in various theaters of human relatedness, most often on the world’s economic, social and political stages. But the play repeatedly folds. Over the course of the Twentieth Century, the radical liberal’s attempts to create a brave new socialist world have invariably failed. At the dawn of the Twenty-first Century his attempts continue to fail in the stagnant economies, moral decay and social turmoil now widespread in Europe. An increasingly bankrupt welfare society is putting the U.S. on track for the same fate if liberalism is not cured there. Because the liberal agenda’s principles violate the rules of ordered liberty, his most determined efforts to realize its visionary fantasies must inevitably fall short. Yet, despite all the evidence against it, the modern liberal mind believes his agenda is good social science. It is, in fact, bad science fiction. He persists in this agenda despite its madness.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD is the author of The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago and served for two years as a psychiatrist in the United States Army. He is currently in private practice in the Chicago area.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Lyle Rossiter's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: True,
the liberal peoples the world with "Those who occupy this world are 'workers,' 'minorities,' 'the little guy,' 'women,' and the 'unemployed.'" We conservatives would fill it with family -- which in a sense, means with "me." Well, at least self-loathing is not at the core. And because it is not narcisistic, such self-interest can be enlightened.

Conservatives are comfortable with individual power. Self-reliance, rugged individualism - all reflect the idea of the capable man. Liberals are ever so uncomfortable with the idea of some one person - say, fathers - having lots of power. They're comfortable with collective power - group decisions, shared responsibility: a frankly corporate ... dare I say, syndicalist, mentality.

We might caricature either of these trends of thought, these character traits. The conservative is selfish. The liberal is cowardly. One lusts for power, the other fears accountability. There is truth to all such criticisms, when applied to the unwise and unbalanced examples of these types. But both modes of operating are necessary, in their place, depending on conditions.

Consider Hamilton and Jefferson. Hamilton the money-man, the guy who wanted a big government to make lots of internal improvements - roads, canals, ports - because these would benefit commerce. Jefferson, the rural idealist, in favor of an agrarian nation of small and self-reliant towns knit together as a loose economic confederation within the greater national federation. So the question is, who was the conservative?

The term doesn't really apply, does it. The stereotype is that conservatives want small government, like Jefferson, but great economic prosperity, like Hamilton. Liberals want big governmental programs - but somehow we just know that Jefferson was a liberal. The confusion resides in the misapplication of labels. Hamilton might be the liberal - he wanted to reshape the world using corporate power. Jefferson wanted to conserve the rustic nature of the country, with its small town ideals.

Consider then our Mr. Bush, so Big Government, so profligate with money, driving up the debt, never saying no to a spending bill ... well, how Hamiltonian. Another way of looking at it, is that he's not afraid to spend a dollar, to make a dollar. Again, he is that anomaly, a conservative activist. It doesn't fit into a little box of orthodoxy, but we need not be dismayed by this. We live in revolutionary times, and new paradigms are emerging. For the good or the bad, who can say. But that's the reality.

Big Lefty liberals, on the other hand, have simply absorbed the values of Marx and the philosophy of Rousseau. Free love and socialism. What the New Age religion is to Hinduism - a westernized, psychologized paganism - the modern liberal is to the old-time radical. The revolution most certainly will be televised. In fact, it's all television will show, and all LA NY Times will print. The revolution has become institutionalized, like the Mexican political oligarchy - like Castro's Cuba. Ours isn't a banana republic, but a ... oh, say, latte republic.

Manliness is a great virtue. Machismo is pathetic. I see manliness as a conservative trait - steadfast, stoical, great-hearted, easy-going, humorous ... well, sounds like every good thing, doesn't it. I'm trying to think of a fair-minded counterpart for the left. Compassion or sensitivity won't do, because these are part of what true manliness is - think: Jesus ... one tough hombre.

Ah, I see the confusion. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were manly. Both were conservative. I use the word conservative to embody the masculine ideal. The counterpart to that need not be liberal, but it is certainly disloyal, self-centered and licentious. Wow. Contemptible, right?

But maybe that's just my bias.

J
http://forgottenprophets.blogspot.com/

Book
Where the heck do I find this book? Amazon doesn't list it and B&N says it was published in Oct. 2006 (paperback), but they don't have any copies.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.