Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Maggie Gallagher :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Mormon Advantage
by Maggie Gallagher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are Barack Obama's friends -- like Bill Ayers -- legitimate political issues?

Mitt Romney is riding high this week after his victory in "the first primary," which consists of raising cold, hard cash to compete: more than $20 million in the first quarter, $5 million more than his closest contender, Rudy "Lay off my wife!" Giuliani. John McCain came in a lackluster third with $12.5 million.

Romney's campaign benefited from two distinct donor networks, according to media accounts: Wall Street and Mormons. GOP front-runner Rudy, struggling with one of those weird media freak shows erupting around his wife, Judith (her alleged participation in future Cabinet meetings and former puppy killings), must be a little envious on both counts.

Why is it that all the Dem candidates are still married to their first spouse, while among the current crop of leading GOP contenders, the only guy with just one wife is the Mormon?

Truth is, I don't think this is just an accident. There's something about Mormons the rest of us ought to pay attention to: Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints do much better than almost any other faith group at sustaining a marriage culture -- and they do this while participating fully and successfully in modern life. Utah is above the national average in both household income and the proportion of adults who are college graduates.

While reading about Romney's cash victory, I was already deep into the hot-off-the-Oxford-Press book, "Forbidden Fruit: Sex and Religion in the Lives of American Teenagers", by University of Texas sociologist Mark Regnerus. This book tells you more about the sex lives of Mormon (and other) teens than you ever wanted to know. For example, 77 percent of Mormon teens age 13 to 17 support saving sex for marriage, compared to 74 percent of evangelicals, 52 percent of mainline Protestants, 51 percent of Catholics and 27 percent of Jewish teens. It's not that LDS teens are unusually prudish, either. Mormon teens were more likely than any other religious group (except Jews) to agree that "sex would give you much pleasure". They are also far more likely than any other religious group to say it would make them feel guilty (77 percent, compared to 66 percent of evangelicals, 52 percent of mainliners, 47 percent of Catholics and 45 percent of Jewish teens.) The vast majority of all teens report their mothers would be upset if they had sex, but even here, Mormon moms stand out: 96 percent of LDS teens say having sex would upset their mother, compared to 89 percent of evangelicals, 83 percent of mainliners, 81 percent of Catholics and 79 percent of Jewish teens.

And while the vast majority of single people do eventually have sex sometime outside of marriage, Mormon teens were unusually likely to act on their beliefs. Only 12.6 percent of Mormon teens had had sex, compared to 18 percent of evangelicals and Catholics, 15 percent of mainliners and 19 percent of Jewish teens. (Mormon teens are also, incidentally, much more likely than any other religious group to report using birth control at first sex, perhaps partly because more Mormons are married before they have sex, but maybe also because the rest REALLY don't want their moms to find out.)

"Mormons are distinctive, absolutely, and even from their conservative evangelical cousins", as Regnerus told me. His new research focuses on the sex lives of teens, but other research suggests LDS church members are far less likely to have children out of wedlock, more likely to marry, and to have somewhat larger families (Utah is the only state where non-Hispanic white women have on average slightly more than two children).

All that delayed gratification adds up to good things for children and society. Not to mention, ambitious Young Readers take note, an unusually straight shot at the White House. Or at least, one less thing to worry about.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Maggie Gallagher is a nationally syndicated columnist, a leading voice in the new marriage movement and co-author of The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially.

Be the first to read Maggie Gallagher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: All Mormon Missionaries teaching hated
ALL Mormon Missionaries are sent out to teach false and hateful things about Christianity. ALL Mormon Missionaries claim as part of Mormon doctrine that ALL Christian Churches Have Fallen Away and ARE teaching ABOMINABLE Creeds to their members.

ALL Mormon Missionaries are sent out teaching false and hateful things that ALL professing Christians are Corrupt. All of this because they believe Joseph Smith more than they believe the Bible.


Answers to gunlock bill questions
Another reason Abraham would pay tithes to a premortal Jesus Christ would be to teach the lesson of rendering (giving a sacrifice) unto God.

The more important point is why is there No other example of this Melchizedek priesthood ANYwhere in ANY scripture until the Mormons come along. Surely God would have Made sure in the Bible that this priesthood was Not Lost for almost 4000 years until the Mormons found it.

Hebrews 8:3 "EVERY High Priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, and so it was necessary for this one also to have something to offer". So why do Mormons Not follow this Biblical teaching that EVERY High Priest offer gifts and sacrifices. Do you perform actual blood sacrifices in the Mormon Temples? If not, why not?

There was No apostasy just because some early Church leaders tried to summarize Christian doctrine into the Athanasian Creed. Otherwise, it there was an apostasy according to Mormons it would have been around 400 AD. Now Mormons have to explain why God waited 1400 years before He restored the Church to the earth according to Mormon doctrine. Is God that weak that it took him 1400 years just to correct a CREED?

Mormons obviously underestimate the power and wrath of God. He knocked Saul/Paul off his donkey and the road to Damascus. Why didn't he knock some sense into the early Christian Church leaders who created the Athanasian Creed.

Obviously, God was Not offended by that Creed or he would have Restored things right there and then.

Mormons have to live in a delusional world where Christianity HAD to have fallen away for over 1400 years just because of the Athanasian Creed. And yet Christianity spread to the whole world before Mormons came along. Now Mormons go around the whole world telling Christians that we believe in an ABOMINABLE Creed which over 90% of Christians have never even heard of. Sounds like Mormons are making up these stories to deceive people.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.