Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, May 01, 2008
The Reverend and the Cardinal
By Maggie Gallagher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


This God thing, it's a two-edged sword.

As candidate for president, Sen. Barack Obama has played up his faith credentials. He's a new kind of Democrat, comfortable talking God in a country where church is separated from state, but where religion simply cannot be totally severed from people's political preferences (as Mitt Romney found to his dismay).

This week, Barack Obama had a revelation: Yes, he can! He can disown the pastor who converted him to Christianity, married him to his wife and baptized both his children. "I am outraged by the comments that were made and saddened by the spectacle that we saw yesterday," Obama told assembled reporters. When there's a batty old uncle in the pulpit, of course there's going to be a spectacle.

So now Obama is magisterially excommunicating the old pastor. "I gave him the benefit of the doubt in my speech in Philadelphia, explaining that he's done enormous good," said Obama. But then the old coot turns around and blurts out what he really believes, including "such ridiculous propositions as the U.S. government somehow being involved in AIDS."

Obama had given Rev. Wright absolution and also the ultimate prize: the chance to be known as pastor to the next president of the United States. And instead Rev. Wright chose to stick to his own sick theo-political guns.

He's a pastor, not a politician, Wright told us. Yes -- a pastor who believes there's nothing sick, evil or twisted that the American government might not have done.

And Obama is a politician, not a pastor. But more important, he's made it clear he's the pope, not just a congregant, in his own political church of hope.

At the same time that Rev. Wright's internal melodrama was playing out on the national stage, Cardinal Edward Egan sent out an extraordinary announcement chastising former Mayor Rudy Giuliani by name for receiving communion during the papal mass at St. Patrick's Cathedral.

"The Catholic Church clearly teaches that abortion is a grave offense against the will of God," said the cardinal. "I had an understanding with Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, when I became archbishop of New York and he was serving as mayor of New York, that he was not to receive the Eucharist because of his well-known support of abortion. I deeply regret that Mr. Giuliani received the Eucharist during the papal visit here in New York, and I will be seeking a meeting with him to insist that he abide by our understanding."

Rudy Giuliani not only chose to receive the Eucharist, he spoke to reporters afterward about it. His spokesman now says only that Rudy's religion is a personal and private thing.

The interchange between the cardinal and the former mayor is bound to be misunderstood by many others who see religion merely as a personal and private thing. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Maggie Gallagher is a nationally syndicated columnist, a leading voice in the new marriage movement and co-author of The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially.

Be the first to read Maggie Gallagher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: To Dreadnaught (Pt 3)
If they were in fact not a denomination as they state then how can they be so helpful when an individual wants to find a church with similar beliefs? Are they not all the same? Are they are church or are they not? By definition multiple congregations indicates a denomination and in their case I believe sect is more applicable. I've sited Webster's definition to help him out. If you are not part of one church or denomination then you are part of another. You and I both know that if they were to say they were a denomination they would in fact be a "manmade" church and in doing so they are no longer the one true church as they so desperately claim and want to be. The whole house of cards comes tumbling down on the Preacher and his followers. They exhibit every single qualification to be defined as an organized church/denominaiton and then hide behind the play on words lie they are non-denominational so the followers can be mislead by those in charge. And all the while claiming everyone else is wrong especially the RCC. It's not just hypocritical, it's a shame. Once again the Bible is used as a tool by some to deceive its followers. I do feel sorry for them to be deceived in such a way.

To Dreadnaught (Pt 2)
With these few pieces of information from his own posted website, one must ask Scott: since his arguement is about the one true church and it's inheriant authority and following "the wisdom of men" as being some of his issues the the RCC in a nutshell. Then in his "church:
1. There must be someone in charge either offically or unoffically otherwise who would approve anything that's posted other than Scripture itself. Who decides the standeard that the Bible Study tests are based on? A single person or group? Either way there must be a leader (whether they admit it or not). A leadership structure incicates Authority. Who in his church consented to and gave the Authority or at least who made David Pratte the lead preacher?
2. By virtue of the fact that they must explain/expound/justify each and every verse indicates a man or men's shall we say, opinion, of what the message of the text is. What makes their explaination more or less plausible then say the RCC? Regardless, is this not following the "wisdom of men"? In one paticular statement the cited Deuteronomy verse justifying it wasn't even close to being a good reference source. How many more intentional or unintention madmade errors are there on the site?
3. They claim to be non-denominational and that they have no statement of Faith and only the Word of God in the Bible is their authority. Really? Reread number one.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.