Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Marvin Olasky :: Townhall.com Columnist
Pastor-Populist Mike Huckabee
by Marvin Olasky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are Barack Obama's friends -- like Bill Ayers -- legitimate political issues?

How many conservative Christian politicians go on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" without being sliced and diced? Maybe one -- and an intriguing part of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee's presidential candidacy is his ability to get host Jon Stewart eating out of his hand.

Last month Stewart accusingly said his audience fears a "conservative, evangelical Republican." Huckabee responded, "I'm a conservative, but I'm not mad at everybody. I'm pro-life, but we have to be concerned about a child's entire life." He then matched Stewart yuk for yuk, declaring that had he worked in partisan ways with an overwhelming Democratic legislature, "we couldn't have passed gas in the House chamber."

Stewart, who dines on double entendres, said in his overly solemn, self-mocking way, "I don't care for that type of humor." Huckabee responded with a grin, "I noticed." He connects better with the Stewart generation than with the Cato Institute and the Club for Growth: The former gave Huckabee an "F" for spending and tax policy in 2006, and the latter dinged him as a "tax hiker" for, among other things, raising gas taxes.

Huckabee defends himself by saying that he responded to court demands for added educational funding and pushed for a gas tax raise because 80 percent of Arkansans want improved highways. But his willingness to consider tax increases reflects a populist impulse that could make or break his candidacy. He readily describes the sins of economic and political elites: "the greed of Wall Street, the corruption of K Street."

Huckabee talks about what America means for those like himself, who grew up where there "wasn't a lot of money, wasn't a lot of pedigree" -- and sometimes sounds like his equally charming predecessor, Bill Clinton. Note the similarities: Both are from Hope, Ark.; both are past Boys State members who went on to chair the National Governors Association; both are musically inclined, with Clinton offering glissandos and growls on the saxophone and Huckabee playing bass guitar in the band Capitol Offense and both are Southern Baptists (with strikingly different theologies).

Their biggest commonality is their humble origin, which leads Huckabee to say of his background, "Some of us know what it's like to start at the bottom of the ladder." But instead of descending into class warfare, Huckabee finishes his populist pitch by saying "where you finish is up to you." Huckabee is also the anti-Clinton in that reporters feel no need to do a bimbo watch with him: He and his wife Janet apparently have a strong marriage.

Huckabee's story of personal change will wear well on afternoon talk shows. Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 2003 and told his abundant heft threatened his heart, he lost 110 pounds and became so fit that he ran and completed four marathons in 2005 and 2006. His own story is now part of his political pitch: Individuals can eat less, exercise more, and in the process reduce health care costs that threaten personal and national budgets.

Huckabee talks about tough policy issues in a folksy way. When he and I recently spoke in Washington, he told how he had just flown there from the Little Rock airport, where the security guards know who he is -- but he still had to take the coins from his pocket and the shoes from his feet "as if I was wearing a turban on my head and went by the name of Abdul."

Huckabee said he and other Americans don't object to that process, and they want immigrants to be required also to enter through an orderly process rather than a porous border: That's why a border barrier is essential. When that's in place, a reasoned debate about entry can begin, because it's clear that we "only have so many seats on the airplane."

Pundits count three or four seats on the GOP presidential campaign plane, and say they're occupied by McCain, Giuliani, Romney and (maybe) Gingrich. Might there be one more?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Marvin Olasky is editor-in-chief of the national news magazine World, provost of The King's College, and a professor of journalism at The University of Texas at Austin. For additional commentary by Marvin Olasky, visit www.worldmag.com.
 
Be the first to read Marvin Olasky's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Nanny-state Republican? No thanks
After hearing a commentary about him on the Michael Medved radio show the other day, I decided that Mike Huckabee is one potential Republican candidate who won't be getting my vote, in either the primary or the general election. I'm not thrilled that he's an evangelical minister; I believe in that "myth", separation of church and state, and would rather not have to choose between the Democratic Party and the Theocratic Party. Nonetheless, that in itself wouldn't absolutely bar me from voting for Huckabee. It isn't reassuring to read that he raised taxes in Arkansas. And speaking of that state, after Bill Clinton, the thought of another ex-governor of Arkansas in the White House, even from the other party, doesn't appeal to me.

But what really caused me to cross Huckabee off my list was the report of his view that we face a "health crisis" rather than a "health care crisis"-- and that the answer is more and more "nanny state" type laws to *force* us to live healthier lifestyles. Up with health, down with freedom. If Huckabee lost a lot of weight himself, fine. I've lost a lot myself, by actions of my own choice. But I damn well want it to *remain* my choice how much priiority to put on health over other values, and what measures to take to protect it. Stay the hell out of my life and my personal business, Huckabee. And stay the hell out of the White House.

With potential candidates like John McCain (who eviscerated the First Amendment in the name of "campaign finance reform"), Huckabee, and Giuliani (who I actually like in some respects, but whose stands on gun control and civil liberties generally are disturbing), the Republicans seem determined to drive libertarians like me and libertarian-oriented conservatives away from their party. They may be asking for more outcomes like the '06 Senate race in Wyoming -- and the whole Senate-- was tipped by defections to the Libertarian Party candidate.

What it is about roads, Derek.
Mr. Leaberry said, "What is it with the love affair of many conservatives with roads? Although a certain amount of roadway is needed for utilitarian reasons, they are ugly in themselves and destructive of rural life. America is overbuilt with roads and roads erode conservative values. I won't hold my breathe but the Interstate Highway system should be disbanded, the interstates should be given to the individual states to administer, and the federal gasoline tax should be abolished."

Roads are tools for society, and like other tools are shaped by their creators and users, not the other way around. The tools themselves are value neutral. The erosion of rural life can more properly be traced to the latter stages of the industrial revolution, when economies of scale brought about by mass production techniques drew ever larger populations to the urban production centers. I suppose you can blame the roads indirectly by blaming Henry Ford, who was responsible for the proliferation of automobiles needing roads by adapting & perfecting the mass production techniques developed by the firearms industry about 50 years earlier- you may as well blame the rooster for the sunrise.

As for the so-called ugliness, I personally rather like the sight of 2 clean ribbons of concrete winding away into the distance among the green, rolling hills, making the beauties of our vast land more available to everyone.

To the more mundane item of administration: the states are already mostly responsible for the maintenance of that portion of the Interstate System inside their borders, and provide at least a large minority of the funds to build new highways. I believe the initial plan was for states to pay half of the construction costs, and then take over upkeep & repair costs. As the system is at least 105% complete according to the original plans, it is past time to repeal the federal gasoline & diesel taxes. They are currently sent back to the states for road projects anyway- after the feds skim off their cut, of course. The only purpose of those taxes now is to give greater vote buying ability to Congress, and to use as both carrot & stick against the states (most notably in "mandating" seat belt use laws).
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.