Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Left Consumed by Hate, Self-Loathing
By Matt Barber
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


The recent media tempest surrounding the passing of Reverend Jerry Falwell has blown away the mask of sublime compassion and tolerance worn by members of the mainstream left. Sadly – pitifully, really – the collective face exposed beneath the altruistic facade is one marred by ugliness and hatred – scarred by latent self-loathing.

Anti-Christian activist and former John Edwards presidential campaign blogger Amanda Marcotte – whom Edwards defended prior to her resignation from his campaign – kicked off the dancing-on-the-grave hoedown on her popular Pandagon website. Upon news of Falwell’s death, Marcotte pronounced, “The gates of hell swing wide open and Satan welcomes his beloved son.” Further down the thread, someone identified as “Vir Modestus” replied, “There is no heaven (or alas, hell) for him to go to. All that’s left is memory. May his memory rot like his flesh.” Blog member “tzs” longed for the days of old, writing, “…after watching Falwell I know why the Romans threw the Christians to the lions.”

Meanwhile, on the “gay” JoeMyGod weblog, “Vince” lamented, “I had hoped the [expletive deleted] would have pulled through and lived the rest of his life as a vegetable…” And “MegaHorror” over at Wonkette wrote, “I hope he suffered and I hope he was scared…”

There have been thousands of such hateful musings from self-identified “gays” and “lesbians,” atheists and other moveon.org types who make up the base of the “progressive” movement. Many of them can’t even be repeated.

Members of the mainstream media have also piled on. Chicago Sun Times “religion” columnist Cathleen Falsani (who claims to be a Christian) shamelessly celebrated Rev. Falwell’s death in her May 18th column Sigh of Relief over Falwell’s Death, equating him to a murderous mafia don and writing, “In fact, my very first thought upon hearing of the Rev. Falwell’s passing was: Good. And I didn’t mean ‘good’ in a oh-good-he’s-gone-home-to-be-with-the-Lord kind of way. I meant ‘good’ as in ‘Ding-dong, the witch is dead.’”

Although we might expect a spattering of comparable vitriol from a handful of right-leaning fringe elements if a similarly controversial liberal figure had died, it’s hard to imagine those inside the pro-family conservative mainstream – which Rev. Falwell represented – engaging in such a vile celebration of death.

What causes a heart to become so blackened? Why such hatred for a man who spent his entire life in service to both the Lord he loved and to his fellow man? True, he was unapologetically blunt in his defense of objective truth and unwavering in his opposition to sin, but Rev. Falwell showed – in word and deed – that he truly cared for those who hated him. He exposed them to the compassion and love of Christ, who freely offers salvation from the spiritual and physical death which is a natural consequence of immoral self-indulgence.

It’s not Rev. Falwell they hate so much as the truth he delivered. And as much as they hate that truth, they hate the Author of that truth. Scripture tells us that God’s natural law – His objective truth – is written on the heart of every man, woman and child. Our innate understanding of that absolute truth – whether we acknowledge it or not – coupled with our accountability to a sovereign but loving Creator, becomes like a virus to those who deny it. That denial of reality in turn manifests itself in a visceral hatred of those other equally broken and fallen souls who, by contrast, do acknowledge His truth.

Man’s rebellion against the Creator is no new thing. It's a time-honored tradition among those who prefer to view the world through the prism of moral relativism. And the world’s hatred of those who labor to share His truth is as robust as that rebellion. Matthew 5:11-12 tells us, “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”

Yes, Rev. Falwell’s death has stripped away the mask, betraying the angry, rebellious and hurting countenance of those who hated him. If they could have, they would have thrown him to the lions. But they didn’t have to. He entered the den willingly with love in his heart and truth on his lips for Christ’s name sake. And based on that objective truth, Rev. Falwell’s reward in heaven will be great indeed.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Matt Barber is one of the "like-minded men" with Concerned Women for America and serves as CWA's policy director for cultural issues.

Be the first to read Matt Barber's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: ethical judgement...
Thanks T2long-
These exchanges are very helpful, and I appreciate you taking the time. You have mentioned that you are a soldier, serving in Afghanistan...or you did. Is that correct?

I do distinguish between hate and disapproval.
You are an individual, but you did invoke "you must allow others the same right and obligation to disapprove that which you judge wrongful or harmful".

What must also be distinguished too, is wrongful and harmful.
And heterosexuals continue to NOT do that when it comes to gay lives, and comportment.
NO distinctions are made between addiction, murder, adultery or other such behaviors.
You know that straight people do that, constantly.
And can't have a conversation without bringing those things up.

I, disapprove of hypocrisy, contradiction, injustice and inequlity, T2long.
I disapprove of using the morality stick in the law to bash a single group that bears a single characteristic that is distinctly different from heterosexuality...yet the other issues of morality do not separate the person from their human rights and civil equality.

For example: the most reprobate straight person, still has far more rights, access and protection than the most upstanding, committed and talented gay person.

And on that alone, is when the issue of discriminating on the basis of ethics and moral flies right out the window.

And a person's characteristic, that's inherent, and as inborn as yours in your orientation is THE only thing that distinguishes you from a gay person.
Everything else bears the same potential, and that goes for goodness, support, intergration and social cooperation too.
Which are the only things that should concern you.

I do indeed understand about distinctions.
But don't tell it to me.
Evidently, morally sound distinctions are escaping straight people all the time, about the gay population alone.

And to agree that rightfully, I dispprove of some of the attitudes and treatment directed at homosexuals,
than it's cold comfort when those actions are put into practice.

And in ways where a gay person cannot know, or in what way or when...the ax will drop on them.
This is also an indicator of the LACK of consistent application of principle from straight people.

And living that way is a terrible and unfair burden. There is no option of an honest and open life.
There is risk that such a burden will become a preoccupation and other things of merit won't be fully realized.

I know that straight folks simply DON'T think that deeply, or care to, or feel any obligation whatsoever to apply their so called ethics consistently or fairly...let alone RIGHTLY.
Mostly because it's straight people in power and who demand the most control over gay lives.

Sound and morally correct applications wouldn't have destructive results on gay lives, nor on the lives of the straight people who depend on them.
That's how we are to know the right and wrong of a thing, T2long.

And if being gay were so harmful and destructive-then discrimination, isolation and socio/political prejudice would have good results and happier people.

That is also how you know if disapproval and treatment is right.

And clearly, being gay isn't what's harmful and wrong...
It's what straight people do against them by BELIEVING being gay is harmful and wrong.

That is a rationalization, not a justification.
Another distinction that isn't being made.

I don't know if you're young, I don't know if you have children already and know their disposition.

But the beauty part of understanding gays and lesbians better, is knowing one in your own family from the beginning.
This is a popuation that comes to any family or culture universally and indigenously.
And indication of this characteristic being inborn and not determined by nurture or family arrangement..except when the youngster feels it's safe to come out and be honest with the family.
This is what confuses straight people, they usually don't know someone is gay in the family until that person is an adult.
That's not deception, that's survival.

I think a gay kid in your family would have a hard time being honest and open with you, wouldn't they?
You have no confidence in them as a decent and potentially great person, do you?

Why should they want to tell you, when you're already thinking they are a harmful and wrongful person?

The bottom line is, straight people don't know enough, and often don't want to know what they have to and should know, to make such profound decisions on gay lives.

But gay folks know everything about straight people. Everything.

Never a morally sound situation, ever.






Really, last post
"Is there no bottom to the hypocrisy of heterosexuals?"

Let's not paint all heterosexuals with the same brush, any more than we'd want all homosexuals stereotyped. Agreed?

As for disapproval sounding "too much like what a parent confers on a child", it seems clear that you disapprove (rightfully) some of the attitudes and treatment directed towards homosexuals. Disapproval is the inevitable result of exercising any sort of ethical judgement. You have the right and obligation to disapprove that which you judge to be harmful or wrongful, and you must allow others the same right and obligation. What must NOT be countenanced is the practice of allowing disapproval to encourage us to be hateful... which is why it is vital to distinguish properly between hate and disapproval, in the first place.

Now, really, good night. We'll converse again later.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: