Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Michael Medved :: Townhall.com Columnist
Who should stay? Who should go?
by Michael Medved
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are Barack Obama's friends -- like Bill Ayers -- legitimate political issues?

The divide-and-conquer strategy that works so well in warfare and politics also represents the best approach for confronting the problem of millions of illegal immigrants who live and work in the USA.

No one knows the actual number of undocumented, unauthorized residents, but the best estimates suggest that they comprise more than 11 million of our neighbors. This massive segment of our population hardly represents a monolithic, homogenous group —for one thing, nearly half (44%) of illegals come from nations other than Mexico. Moreover, as many as 50% of them never ran across the border but entered the USA legally and then stayed longer than their formal authorization permitted.

This hugely diverse collection of humanity defies attempts by impassioned advocates on all sides to generalize about illegals. Anti-immigrant activists distort reality when they suggest that the undocumented are predominantly gang members, welfare chiselers and uneducated burdens on the taxpayer. Most illegals actually work hard and pay billions in taxes, while many own their own homes, go to church and give to charity.

At the same time, it's ridiculous to suggest that all illegals count as good neighbors, loving parents and inspiring examples of the work ethic. About 400,000 have run afoul of the law, with warrants out for their arrest as they defy governmental efforts at deportation.

A reflection of humanity

In short, like every other group, illegals include examples of both the worst and the best of humanity: Some of them damage our society through criminality, abuse of the social safety net and insistence on ethnic separatism, while many others toil tirelessly at their jobs while raising decent children and longing to take their place in the mainstream.

The only sensible approach is to recognize such divisions and to respond accordingly: making it difficult for the destructive immigrants to remain in the USA, while making it possible for the first time for the best, most useful of the illegals to take the path to citizenship and assimilation.

Rather than expecting governmental bureaucracies to determine who deserves to stay and who ought to leave, it makes far more sense to force illegals to choose for themselves. That was the core idea behind the immigration reform bill passed by the Senate last year, and with suitable modifications it's the same approach that deserves revival by the new Congress and approval by the president.

The choice presented to undocumented immigrants must be clear-cut: If they've avoided serious criminality, worked steadily at jobs and mastered English, they should get the chance to pay stiff fines (at least several thousand dollars) for initial unauthorized entry and to pay all back taxes in order to qualify for legal residency and begin the path to citizenship. This approach would allow the immigrant to acknowledge his wrongdoing in violating the border, and to commit himself to making up for that wrongdoing by following rules that allow him to enter the mainstream.

For those who don't choose to pay the fines and obey the new regulations, or whose past criminality or failure to learn English makes them ineligible for "earned legalization," there's only one other choice: Go home.

The vigorous enforcement of workplace sanctions against employers —combined with a vastly improved, high-tech system of ID, and aggressive efforts to serve existing warrants and deport criminals —should greatly reduce the number of illegal immigrants who neither want nor deserve to remain in the USA. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Michael Medved, nationally syndicated talk radio host, is author of 10 non-fiction books, including The Shadow Presidents and Right Turns.

Be the first to read Michael Medved's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Who Should Stay? Who Should Go?
None should stay. All should go. Those with the necessary burning desire should then be provided with a legal means to return, but they should have to work for it like the legal immigrants. Any less restrictive action is just enabling these lawbreakers.
Lyle Martin
Morehead City, NC

Medved needs to be dropped
I don't understand why "conservative" publications and websites continue to publish columns from people like Michael Medved and Linda Chavez. Their columns are pure anti-American crap.

Immigration policy and reforms need to be designed to benefit Americans - not foreign governments, not big business, and not any other special interests.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.