Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
On language
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Who should McCain select as his running mate?






Dear Consultant,

It was wholly a pleasure to receive your reaction to a recent column of mine critical of the English Only types. The column's thesis: Societies that proclaim their mother tongue THE ONE AND ONLY OFFICIAL LANGUAGE are playing a futile and silly game, and in the end may only crimp the style of the language they're supposedly protecting.

I am glad to repeat your e-mailed rebuttal in full:

"Been to South Florida recently, Paul? I was living in Miami in 1970 when the hordes of Cubans didn't speak English. Not too long ago I was in Miami consulting on a court case. Those Cubans (now) spoke perfect English and they were prosperous and productive. If they were still only Spanish speakers, they would be confined to enclaves."

Good point. And the most impressive thing about it is that "those Cubans" and their children and grandchildren -- who by now doubtless have become those Americans -- had acquired English without the government's ever having made it the one, nationally certified Official Language. (Drumroll in background.)

It's as if those folks had figured out -- entirely on their own -- what social mobility required of them. Just like every other immigrant generation. As in many another field, the free market has certain advantages when it comes to language, too.

Government compulsion, particularly in any matter as intimate as the language we speak, and think in, can prove counterproductive.

Whenever I hear people speak fluently in French, or Russian, or Arabic, I am consumed by envy, and even flirt with the idea of trying to learn it. My reaction would surely be different if some official government language czar were to order me to speak another language. ("You vill learn German!")

I can feel my spine stiffening at the very thought. Maybe it's an American's instinctive reaction to being ordered about. I suspect it's also a human reaction.

Sir, you must come visit Northwest Arkansas in 20, 30 years, Lord willing, and have a nice conversation -- in perfect English, or at least fluent Arkinsaw -- with the children and grandchildren of today's hard-working, Spanish-speaking chicken-pluckers and siding-installers. They're a big factor in the economic boom in those parts.

Who knows, you might even be here on business -- to consult with one of their now grown kids, who by then will have become one of the country's leading experts in aerodynamics or international law or some other challenging field. Hey, it's America!

I really should sign this letter:

Son of Immigrant Cobbler

---------------

Dear Linguist, Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: alwaysquestion
My apologies. I was focusing on the topic of this article only.

I agree that parents should be the final arbiters of what their children learn. So much so that, beyond my budget, I sent my child to a private school for 11 years. No voucher system either. http://www.wakingbear.com/parntrts.htm

That being said, many of my friends and neighbors cannot afford the extra cost. Subsequently their kids attend public schools with a set curriculum. Making a second language mandatory would not add any additional cost to the process.

As for “WE MADE”, it merely was the statement that our society has created requirements that are designed to educate and prepare a child for his/her future participation in a strong and vibrant pursuit of excellence in this world.

And yes, I made my child eat her vegetables, do her homework, go to bed early and get to school on time. No use of force in the violent sense of the word. Merely, requiring her to comply with my rules for her development. That’s what parents do.

Shalom

Language
Somehow I feel the main point of the argument is missing. Usually this is done to confuse or to just change the subject. It is not that most Americans don`t want people, who are not Americans, to come to their country and try to change the fact that we speak English in our schools and in our halls of justice. I feel if you cannot read or understand an language, In the USA or anyother country you may be in, how are you going to understand what is permitted and what is not? How can you follow the laws? It should be obvious, you can not. What ever language you speak to your friends and family or in your home is not the issue you are trying to make. Or else you are merely trying to confuse the issue. In that case, shame on you!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.