Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
Tribune Media Service
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are Barack Obama's friends -- like Bill Ayers -- legitimate political issues?

Another September 11th has come and gone, and another American general, God help him, is trying to fight a war despite a deeply divided home front. For the country has grown weary of this war. Weary, confused and divided.

Called home to defend his strategy, four-star Gen. David Petraeus faced not just some fair questions but the usual scathing attacks from the usual overheated quarters. (The lowest? A full-page ad in the New York Times headlined: "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?")

American strategy has changed, but reports of progress are disputed. Rancor spreads. At home and abroad, the government's every move is challenged in the media, in the courts, in the minds and hearts of the American people.

The leader of the opposition in the U.S. Senate declared this war lost months ago. And even before this commander testified before the House Armed Services Committee, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee had pronounced him "dead flat wrong." Divided we flail - at each other.

The next presidential campaign is already under way more than a year ahead of election day, and a president's approval ratings haven't been this low since another feisty commander-in-chief seemed determined to persist in an unpopular war on the Korean peninsula.

Officially, that conflict wasn't even a war but a "police action." Unofficially, it was called Truman's War, and it, too, was declared lost, or at least stalemated, but certainly dead flat wrong. The wrong war at the wrong time in the wrong place. At one point the American commander in the field was replaced, but the war continued - a constant drain on American resources and a steady sacrifice of American blood.

Sometimes you hear today's war on terror referred to as the so-called War on Terror, its very name disputed. Words of resolve and courage have given way to uncertainty, recriminations and just plain war-weariness. The casualty figures mount and the military funerals go on.

There is no aspect of this war, whether it's being waged in Iraq or Afghanistan or around the world, in airports or through intelligence operations, that has not come under criticism, yet no clear alternative to victory has emerged.

Yes, we were warned this would be another long, twilight struggle akin to the Cold War, and that this war would be different from any other the country has waged: "Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success." -George W. Bush, September 20, 2001.

But speeches are one thing, reality another. It's one thing to utter brave words amid the still smoldering wreckage of the Twin Towers, another to go on fighting year after year, one September 11th after another.

There was even a debate this year over whether the date should inspire so much ceremony. The day that changed everything hasn't; we bicker and quibble and grumble and litigate and castigate as the war joins one more topic over which we Have Issues.

Yes, this is a different war from those of the past - as we remember the past. For by now history has done its usual trick and turned into myth, and we remember even the cruelest war in man's history, the Second World War, as the good war fought by the greatest generation, when the country was united, all of us supported a dynamic leader who enjoyed the nation's confidence, and victory inevitably awaited. As usual, memory dims and is replaced by monuments. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Yeah but
lilly writes: 4:28 AM
Differences
Here's one difference between then and now: when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, FDR didn't respond by bombing Argentina. He didn't claim mendaciously that Juan Peron, a cruel despot, had the means to attack the United States. He didn't kill thousands of young Americans in order to bring democracy to Argentina.
-----------------------------

After Japan attacked Pearl Harbor we did not go to Japan until 4 years later.
We actually fought in the Philipines first, then all over the Pacific Ocean from Australia to the Attu Islands.

The Japanese were all over the place, just as the muslim terrorists of today.

Al Quida marches on Washington.
Al Quida marches on Washington.

Never too cold for smoking dope and oral sex under a tree!

Abbie – STEAL THIS BOOK – Hoffman is dead, Jerry – Yuppie Networking Program – is dead, Pig Pen and the Hog Farm are gone gone gone.

Most of the cast of Woodstock ended up in mental institutions, penal institutions, or prematurely dead.

Are these fakers having fun yet?

It’s tough to have fun with the AIDS virus jumping off of toilet seats.

Monday is the first day of the workweek – GET A JOB!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.