Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Man and His Moment of Truth: Half a Century Later
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who will win on November 4th?


There were giants in the earth in those days, as the Book tells us, and thank goodness they keep reappearing when they are most needed. Like during the bad old days half a century ago here in Arkansas and throughout the South. It was a time when people were confronted with the clearest of political and moral choices, perhaps the clearest since the Civil War itself.

By 1957, the question had become unavoidable: What was it to be, the rule of law or defiance? State Sovereignty or the Union now and forever?

It was a time when every politician, every leader, every minister, every citizen was called on to choose sides, or hunker down and try to stay neutral between right and wrong.

It was a time made for an ambitious demagogue — even in a state then considered moderate in its racial views. That would change soon enough, for the crisis presented an opportunistic governor his chance to become a nigh-eternal incumbent. All he had to do was fan the flames. All he had to do was stir up the gathering hatred and exploit it. He could even shut down the schools if he wanted, and the mob would rage, the crowd cheer, and the voters go his way. Again and again. Which was the choice Orval Faubus made.

Most of the state’s politicians either went along or went passive, ducking for cover during what would become the Great Faubusfear.

Some just skedaddled. The state’s junior senator, always a great internationalist, at least in his own eyes, decided this would be just the right time to take an international tour. His actions in 1957, and the years before and after, would prove a portrait in something other than courage. Having already helped set the tinder by placing his indelible signature on the defiant Southern Manifesto the year before, J. William Fulbright didn’t hang around to watch the Crisis when it burst upon the state.

Instead, he chose to view it from a safe distance — merry old England, where he always did seem more at home. It became a pattern with him. Whenever freedom was being threatened by racial demagogues at home or communist aggression abroad, Sen. Fulbright could be counted on — to suggest appeasement.

Such were the unhappy times. But there were giants in the earth even then. They stood out, perhaps because there were so few of them. A whole slew of repressive laws was rammed through the Arkansas legislature in February of 1957 in anticipation of the Crisis to come. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Gestell
You are absolutely right. Greenberg is a liberal, as I have already claimed. However, he would be honorable if he told us that he and his kinfolk send their kids to Little Rock public schools. Like the Kennedys, I bet any of the Greenberg clan haven't sent their kids to Little Rock public schools for at least thirty years.

what's this column doing here?
What's this liberal column doing on TH? I know that TH readers who are real conservatives will soon post objections to the position Greeenberg defends, which is pure, unadulterated big government national liberalism. Now I'm one of those pure unadulterated big government national liberals, so I know a kindred spirit when I see one.

This Ray Smith fellow was clearly a liberal and he worked to undermine what Greenberg calls State Sovereignty, which most conservatives regard as Americanism, pure and simple. Greenberg calls him a "hero," but his position had nothing to do with conservatism.

Real conservatives have no use for the "civil rights" movement and its damage to the principles of the American political system. This movement was, from beginning to end, a liberal movement, in pursuit of liberal goals, by liberal means. The extension of civil rights to black Americans could only be done by the exercise of power by the liberal state, and so it was.

Conservatives should make sure they don't fall into fashionable PC fawning over either civil rights leaders like MLK or Southern turncoats like Ray Smith.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.