Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Monday, January 21, 2008
Martin Luther King: The Radical as Conservative
By Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


History is up to its old tricks again. The radical agitator of one generation becomes the conservative icon of another. Martin Luther King Jr. meets the very definition of an American conservative, that is, someone dedicated to preserving the gains of a liberal revolution.

Even when he was leading the civil rights movement, what appeal could have been more conservative or more American than his now classic speech before the Lincoln Memorial in August 1963?

"I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Is any passage more frequently cited against the quota system called Affirmative Action? Is any passage so clear a call for what conservative candidates for president always seem to be calling for - character?

Even then Martin Luther King's words sounded conservative to those with ears to hear and minds to comprehend, for his message was rooted in traditional values. No wonder the young black radicals of the Sixties used to deride him as De Lawd. It was a toss-up whether his politics or his religion offended them more; the two were inseparable in his case.

To watch this black Baptist preacher out of Alabama on the old, black-and-white television tapes as he describes his very American dream is to realize how easily his ideas could have come from a conservative political tract - if only conservative political tracts were better written. Nothing was clearer about Dr. King's dream than the transformation of political struggle into morality tale. Which explains his effectiveness. He appealed to a common moral ground.

There were always those who thought of Dr. King's sermons as just window dressing for his social aims. They had it backwards. It was his religious ideas that compelled him to make the case for social and political change, and seek to create what he called The Beloved Community.

"Black and white together," the demonstrators used to sing. You don't hear that song much any more. Which may explain why the civil rights movement stopped moving. It became infected with much the same racial myopia it had fought, only with the colors reversed. (Black Power!) Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Apparently Godlilocks can't read
Where are you getting this stuff about Runyon? Have you actually read the opinion? Obviously, if you have, you're seeing things so I will offer some quotes from the opinion:

Held: Section s1981 prohibits private, commercially operated, non-sectarian schools from denying admission to prospective students because they are Negro...The racial discrimination practiced by petitioner amounts to a classic violation of s1981...

Held: Section s1981, as applied in this case does not violate Constitutionally protected rights of free association and privacy, or a parent's right to direct the education of his children.

Held: While under the principle that there is a 1st Amendment right to engage in association for the advancement of beliefs and ideas, it may be assumed that parents have the right to send their children to schools that promote the idea that racial segregation is desirable, and that the children have the right to attend such schools, it does not follow that the practice of excluding minority students is also protected by the same principle. The Constitution places no value on discrimination, and while invidious discrimination may be characterized as a form of excercising freedom of association protected by the 1st Amendment, it has never been afforded affirmative constitutional protections.

Held: While parents have a constitutional right to send their children to private schools that offer specialized instruction, they have no Constitutional right to provide their children with private school education unfettered government regulation.

The opinion goes on, but nowhere does it say anything about the schools in question receiving gov't funds, and specifically states that private schools are not exempt from the applicable laws. Additionally, it makes clear, that their decision is specifically based on s1981 which prohibits discrimination based on race.

goldilocks
Just wanted to point out the facts. You were mistaken and misinformed, which is a hallmark of cons. One day when you pick up a book, you will become a Democrat.

We will agree to disagree. I will make sure to vote your party out of power, by the way.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.