Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Monday, May 19, 2008
Peter J. Wirs :: Townhall.com Columnist
Uniting McCain and Conservatives: Here's How We're Going to Do It
by Peter J. Wirs
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


John McCain and the Conservative Base appear to be irrevocably divided. But delve into the several hundreds of comments to GOP onDemand (and this column) the solution for this schism is more obvious than people think. (Parenthetically, the unveiling of GOP onDemand on Townhall.com was more than successful, it was phenomenal. We were expecting about 30 or so onsite "hits." To date, we have over 8,000 and still counting. The Liberals, Democrats and the press must now understand that MoveOn must now move over).

First, understand that we, the Trustees of the Republican Leadership Trust, are just that — trustees. We are required, by law, to be 100% impartial. We don’t sides. Otherwise, the Orphans Court judges of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas will be quite upset with us. 

Second, understand we were launched by one of the most conservative donors in the nation. Utterly frustrated with RNC’s failure to provide precinct Republican committee people the necessary grassroots support for Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) in 2006, this national conservative leader gave us seed money (and even named the Trust) to make sure that conservatives wouldn’t again suffer losses because of the lack of grassroots support as did Santorum.

Now to the point. Disagreements between people are broken down into "Technical" and "Adaptive" issues. As stated in my forthcoming book, Government Ethics, Accountability and Productivity, "a technical issue is that which the resources (money, manpower, capital) are easily identifiable and the sole question is ascertaining how to marshal or obtain the resources required to resolve the conflict. An adaptive issue, on the other hand, is a subjective response to the conflict, and is the result of the competing value judgments the stakeholders bring to the table. Settling the adaptive issues to [resolve the conflict] requires the leadership to marshal the stakeholders' common value judgments versus the competing value judgments that are dividing the stakeholders."

Obviously, getting the sides to talk is easier said than done. But here, John McCain and the RNC leadership want the Conservative Base back into the fold, because they told me. And through your comments, most of you also want to unite. 

And how do we know it? By how you are saying what you are saying. Out of the thousands of GOP onDemand comments, almost all of you are urging the Republican Party to return to its roots, come back to its base, stop acting as Democrat Lite. And that’s where the solution lies. The real problem is your justified belief that many Inside-the-Beltway Republicans violated your trust, they broke the faith. They said that they were going to cut Federal spending, but didn’t. They said that they were going to shrink the Federal government, but didn’t. They said they were going to conduct themselves ethically, but didn’t. They said they were going to listen, but didn’t.

RNC believes the Conservative Base is already uniting behind McCain. And they cite polling data to back them up. At the same time Robert Novak writes in his May 14, 2008 Evans-Novak Political Report that the "claims that McCain has a united Republican Party behind him are greatly exaggerated. We find considerable opposition on the right . . . The biggest problem is that he does not realize he has a problem."

But the bottom line is this: half a loaf is better than none at all. After what the California Supreme Court did this past week, do you really want an Obama presidency with a veto-proof Democratic Congress appointing judges who will jam same-sex marriage down your throat? Is this what you want?

The reason why our benefactor established the Republican Leadership Trust was to promote Republican unity by providing everyone a meaningful opportunity to be involved — giving everyone a voice that is heard. So, here’s what we are going to do. Go to www.GOPonDemand.com. Click the GRIPE page and specifically elaborate on these two points: Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Peter J. Wirs is currently the Chairman & Co-Trustee of the Republican Leadership Trust as well as the incoming President of the National Conference of Public Officials. The views and opinions found in this article represent the author's views and opinions and not those of any institution or organization with which the author is affiliated.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: May I add:
To our good Doc with respect,

Maybe you think being a social conservative isn't as American as being a staunch Right-Winger.

"Social conservatives would like aggrandized and invasive government power as a means of violently suppressing those he views as enemies in his Kulturkampf ("culture war") to inflict his predominantly religion-based political objectives upon his neighbors." --what a mouthful!

Violently suppressing? Yes, Naughty; you are a violent thug. You're mere enemies of my Kulturcampf (no need to translate, German is accessible to moi.) --INFLICT ! (But I'm not an surgeon.--?)

OK; here's the medical bill:

RELIGION. I see; you want no religion. That's Kultur; that's counter to the French Revolution, your own style. RAISON, Raison will overcome your Leftist enemies. Good; we know they're all predominantly religion-based. What thugs! Lol!

Thank you, Doctor


But what ifAmerica were in fact the land of the Free, and a large segment of free Americans just wish you luck in your noble endeavors, but include them out? I guess in your book they're all thugs, or not real Americans. Maybe you thing their votes are only good in one or two states in the union? Let me try to disabuse you, Doc.

They also have clout; or we wouldn't be in the mess we have today. Since you think we have all the clout we need on the Right, and nobody else needs apply; I suggest:

You & all your holier-than-thou cohort cook up a better system of government than our representative republic. You won't even need any presidents. Just send the orders down the conservative pipeline to Rush and Sean and make us march into the conservative lockstep soon as they're announced on radio.

I like the fact we'll never need Congress again either. Stalin never needed his Duma . They were kept in strict lockstep. If he'd never died (they say doctors murdered him,) the USSR would still be one large concentration camp today. Them were the good old days. Them were the last good doctors.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.