Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Saturday, May 05, 2007
Robert D. Novak :: Townhall.com Columnist
Nancy vs. Charlie
by Robert D. Novak
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who will win on November 4th?


The issue of international trade has produced a tense internal Democratic confrontation between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Charles Rangel, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Rangel has succeeded in negotiating a compromise trade bill with Republicans on his committee (led by Rep. Jim McCrery) and the Bush administration. But Pelosi is attuned to the wishes of Democratic Caucus members, who are being pushed by organized labor to effectively bar imports produced by lower-wage labor.

Rangel's moderate position faces a challenge within the Ways and Means Committee from Rep. Sander Levin, chairman of the Trade subcommittee. Levin's Detroit-area district contains United Auto Workers members and pensioners who want trade protection.

AVOIDING A DEBATE?

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, pleaded a family commitment as the reason for turning down an invitation to debate his Republican counterpart on national television last weekend -- the third time since the first of the year that plans for them to face each other on TV have gone awry.

Rep. Adam Putnam, the 32-year-old chairman of the House Republican Conference, and the 47-year-old Emanuel are rising stars in their respective parties. But television producers have been unable to get them together, most recently on ABC's "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos.

Although Republican operatives have spread the word that Emanuel is avoiding Putnam, no such accusation has come from Putnam himself. Emanuel's staff says it is strictly a scheduling problem, and he will be face to face with Putnam before long.

PERLE ON IRAQ

Ex-CIA Director George Tenet had the date wrong but the message right when he said neo-conservative policymaker Richard Perle was advocating intervention in Iraq immediately after the 9/11 attack on America.

Tenet's memoir ("At the Center of the Storm") reports that Perle had advocated an assault on Iraq when they met at the White House on Sept. 12, 2001. But Perle let it be known last week that he was out of the country that day and never said what Tenet claimed.

However, over the telephone on Sept. 17, Perle told this column that there were few good targets in Afghanistan but many in Iraq. Perle, a former assistant secretary of defense, was then chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Robert Novak is a syndicated columnist and editor of the Evans-Novak Political Report
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Hill and Bill and being black
Bill Clinton was identified by author Toni Morrison as America's first black President because of the circumstances in which he was born and raised, not because of any affinity he had for black people.

Slick Willie was born and raised by a single mom without the benefit of a father, or even a father figure. He also grew up in relative poverty.

These are circumstances that many blacks in America can identify with. But more to Morrison's point, American blacks can much more easily identify with Bill Clinton than they can with any of your typical whitebread Presidents or candidates like the Bushes, Giuliani, McCain, Edwards, Gore, or...Hillary!

For Dixiecrat
Actually, most conservative don't write negative articles about minorities. That's because we seldom write about minorities at all.

We tend to write (and talk) about "people" instead. You know what "people" are. "People" are what you get when you stop being a bigot by assuming everyone must be categorized into some ethno- or religious- or gender- centric slot.

When the subject of "minorities" does come up in conservative think piece it is almost always in reaction or response to some bigotted pandering by the left, as with the posts you are responding to and the discussion in Novak's column.

Conservatives don't pander to minorities because we don't feel guilty about them. And we don't feel guilty about them because we haven't done anything to them. We know we haven't done anything to them because to us they are not "minorities". They are "people" (Are you starting to get the drift?).

Any liberal who figures this out makes great progress in his personal growth. That's why most liberals who do figure it out soon become conservatives.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.