Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Suzanne Fields :: Townhall.com Columnist
Keeping up with the Joneses
by Suzanne Fields
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What did you think of Gov. Sarah Palin's acceptance speech Wednesday night?




It's not easy to wear a label. Too many issues crisscross the lines between liberal and conservative. As in most big families, we're squabbling with each other and challenging Papa Bush and fighting with Mommy Pelosi. Their advisers and consultants are fuming about how to "turn out the base," but it's not clear anymore just what "the base" means.

Peggy Noonan, the scribe for the Reagan Revolution, questions the meaning of the term everyone is talking about. "Nobody sees himself as the base," she observes in The Wall Street Journal. "They see themselves as individuals. And they're not dumb. . . . They know when you're trying to manipulate them."

Camille Paglia, the maverick of arts and letters who describes herself as a Democrat but not a Bush hater, pinpoints the flaw in what the pollsters call her "cohort." She blames the culture of dumbness wrought by liberal professors on campus and encouraged in real life.

"My generation of baby-boom Democrats hasn't done much thinking about international issues except in terms of postmodernist fragmentation or fuzzy, smiley-face multiculturalism," she tells Salon magazine. "We desperately need better candidates." She's particularly hard on baby boomer Bill Clinton, "a compulsive blabbermouth who is compromising his own dignity as a former president. . . . Why is Clinton undermining the authority of the president when national security is so sensitive?" It's too late for Hillary to dump him, but if she were to become president we'd really be in trouble, saddled with a dangerous co-presidency.

If the boomers don't understand the rules of the world where they live, the generation of voters in college today knows even less. The Intercollegiate Studies Institute recently tested 14,000 freshmen and seniors at 50 colleges with 60 questions on American history, government, market economies and U.S. foreign policy. The average "civic literacy" score for seniors was 53.2 percent, for freshman 54.7 percent. Failing grades all.

The longer a student attends class, the dumber he gets. Students at the elite schools fared worse than students at some church and land-grant schools. The Ivy League school whose students ranked highest were those at Princeton, at No. 18. Harvard's students were 25th. The lowest scores were posted at such bastions of higher learning as Cornell, University of California at Berkeley and Johns Hopkins. Go figure, as some unhappy parents will no doubt do.

But there's a voting cohort between Generation Xers and boomers that bears watching. They're the not-so-young Generation Jones. If they're not "the lost generation," they're invisible to most of our culture commentators. The Joneses, who were born between 1954 and 1965, are usually included in the boomer cohort, but Jonathan Pontell, a pop culture consultant who coined the name, says that's a mistake. He thinks the Jonesers may be crucial in next week's congressional elections.

"Coming of age politically in the late 1970s and early 1980s," he says, "Jonesers were the much discussed 'ReaganYouth,' and are the most conservative U.S. generation by a considerable margin." He credits Jonesers, particularly the women, with tipping the election for George W. in the swing states two years ago when they comprised approximately a quarter of the electorate.

They are disproportionately represented among theme voters, such as NASCAR enthusiasts, Office Park Dads and Soccer-Security-Mortgage Moms. They cluster around issues of "moral values," and were polled as pulling away from conservative candidates after the Foley scandal. Now the latest polls show that they have conspicuously returned to the Republican base (apologies to Peggy Noonan).

What makes them different from the boomers is that during their formative years, while their older brothers and sisters were indulging the hedonistic pleasures of Woodstock, they were at home watching the Brady Bunch and supping on mashed potatoes with both parents at the dinner table. They were not traumatized by the Kennedy assassination, but terrified by Jimmy Carter's Iranian hostage crisis. They weren't interested in kicking Richard Nixon around, but were grateful to Ronald Reagan for restoring America's strength in the world.

All labels, generational or otherwise, are handy for pollsters but ultimately misleading. We're more likely to identify with those who share the nostalgia for our youth, especially the connections of music, whether Frank Sinatra, Elvis, the Beatles, Jim Morrison or Madonna. Pop icons don't always tell you much about voter preferences, but Bob Dylan famously observed that "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." Next week we're likely to learn which candidates kept up with the Joneses.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Suzanne Fields is a columnist with The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Suzanne Fields' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Re: Now could we stop kicking the rest
AudiR10 writes: "Don't mindlessly hate me because I was born to a Daddy who came marching home from World War II with only two things on his mind -- marriage and stock car racing, in a year when a lot of other Daddies came marching home with the same thing on their minds."

Easy there, big guy. While I can't speak for everyone here in the Townhall universe, Captain Nemo bears no ill will toward anyone(except, perhaps, fanatical Muslims), especially anyone who loves stock car racing and votes conservative.

There are always exceptions to the general rule. In your case, you are one of the stellar and admirable exceptions to the Boomer Generation.

In the case of your youngest child, please accept my heartfelt condolences. Not all Jonesers are Reaganites and I know a couple of people my age who are certified Daily-Kos Moonbats. It happens, and in this case I am sorry for your loss.

I heard rumors that the Vatican is considering declaring American Liberalism to be a form of demonic possession and will soon be creating a ministry devoted exclusively to exorcising this particular species of demon.

In cases such yours the usual prescription is lots of prayer and an occasional sprinkling with Holy Water. If that fails, chain the victim to the bed and set the CD player to repeat Pat Boone's "Love Letters in the Sand" until the vomiting stops and the victim admits that Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th century. Then and only then will you be able to tidy yourself up and declare, like the little midget lady in the movie Poltergeist that, "This house is clean."

Best regards,

Capt. Nemo

Re: One Hit Wonders and Others
momlady writes: "The Thompson Twins had a really great song "King for Just One Day" and there was that monster hit "Alive and Kickin'" which I think was a second hit for Tears for Fears?"

Indeed. Actually, the Thompson Twins had quite a few hits, including "Doctor, Doctor" and "Hold Me Now." As for Tears for Fears, they banged out "Shout" and a number of other hits straight through the 90's with "Sowing the Seeds of Love."

"And although she's always been a very freaky girl, Annie Lennox and the Eurythmics were a great band."

As were the B-52's. Freaky and weird, but good.

"And 1986 was a very good year--Steve Winwood's Higher Love, Billy Joel's album The Bridge, Paul Simon's Graceland, and who doesn't remember the way they felt when they first heard U2s Joshua Tree?"

You hit the bell.

"I still have to argue that, apart from disco, the 70s had some great music. The Steve Miller Band, Eagles, Doobie Bros., James Taylor's heyday....I feel I could list more great 70s music than 80s which (despite the few I've mentioned fondly above) took the techno of disco too seriously as a new art form....My husband and I have discussed this at length, his suggestion is that the 80s was more a decade of great albums, while the 70s had better music overall (again leaving disco out of it!!) In addition to the albums listed above there is Genesis' Abacab, Yes's album I can't remember the title--it was numbers--and who could leave Dire Straits Brothers in Arms out of such a list? Of course a lot of these people I'm talking about (Billy Joel, Genesis, even U2) go back to the 70s and Simon to the 60s, which did have some really great music too. Any agreement here? Or am I just stepping on toes?"

No toes have been injured in the writing of your post. You made some very good points. Truth be told, I was painting the 70's with very broad tar brush. In my humble opinion what sets the 80's apart from the rest is that it represented a radical departure from conventional music and conventional instruments. It was a decade of experimentation and rapid evolution, that produced some of most stunning and continually listenable music ever created and occasionally some of the most awful freaks and compositional mutations of musical nature ever heard. Nevertheless, the end result was a positive and enduring one for contemporary music.

Many thanks for the post, Momlady. You brought back lots of fond memories.

Best regards,

Capt. Nemo
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.