Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Terence Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
How Many Decades Will It Take to Fix FDA?
by Terence Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Why did Republicans lose in the 2008 elections?



The unfolding tragedy in which four Americans have died in the last two months and about 350 others have suffered adverse reactions after being injected with Chinese-made heparin -- a blood-thinning drug -- has its roots in a spectacular example of bad government that some federal watchdogs started barking at a decade ago.

Elected officials in Washington, D.C., simply did not respond adequately to the warnings.

In 1998, after investigating the Food and Drug Administration's procedures for inspecting foreign factories producing drugs for import into the United States, the Government Accountability Office told Congress the system put Americans at risk.

GAO had discovered two internal FDA documents -- a 1988 "internal review" and a 1993 "internal discussion paper" -- that indicated the agency knew it had problems monitoring the safety of foreign-made drugs.

"The evaluations concluded that unless corrected, problems in FDA's foreign inspection program could lead to the importation of adulterated and low-quality drugs that could pose serious health risks to Americans," Bernice Steinhardt, then the GAO's director of public health issues, told the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

One remarkable GAO discovery: The FDA did not possess a complete and reliable list of the foreign manufacturers producing drugs that would end up in the bloodstreams of Americans.

Had it known who all these foreign manufacturers were, however, the FDA still would not have done a good job inspecting them.

The foreign inspections that FDA did do, GAO discovered, were primarily limited to facilities applying to ship new drugs into the United States. After that, foreign manufacturers rarely saw the sort of routine follow-up inspections U.S.-based manufacturers are subject to every two years.

Nor was the Reagan doctrine of "trust but verify" applied to foreign drug makers in places such as the People's Republic of China. Managers of a U.S. facility where a problem was discovered had to fix it and face re-inspection; managers of a foreign facility simply had to give their word they would fix it.

Lack of resources to conduct foreign inspections, GAO said, led FDA staff "to 'trust' a foreign manufacturer to correct serious manufacturing deficiencies."

Last year, GAO auditors took another look at FDA's system for inspecting foreign drug factories. On Nov. 1, Marcia Crosse, the agency's director of health care, presented their preliminary findings to the same congressional panel that received GAO's 1998 report.

FDA's performance had not improved.

It still did not have a complete and reliable list of foreign factories making drugs that end up in American bloodstreams. "FDA does not know how many foreign establishments are subject to inspection," Crosse told the committee. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Subject: FDA Nonsense in May '08 Hearings
FDA speakers at May’08 congressional hearings on the safety of Chinese imports did a stellar job of talking out of both sides of their mouths.

On one hand they said that American consumers do not have much to worry about. On the other hand they said that FDA was limited in checking on the safety of Chinese food and drug products.

Of course FDA speakers were very careful not to criticize either the Chinese government or irresponsible Chinese manufacturers for making their job not just more difficult but impossible.

They also think that U.S. taxpayers should have to pay for ensuring the safety of Chinese products; that is, we should subsidize the loss of well paying U.S. jobs. FDA speakers would not even suggest that the great burden of Chinese inspections be paid for by the Chinese.

The FDA is worse than worthless in this matter.




lilly
If you were to split the seat of your dress with that big butt, you would try to find some way to blame it on Reagan!
________________________________________

That said;
I don't know of a single Government bureaucracy that functions efficiently.
Must be one someplace?
That is what Government is for. Right?

FDA?
Anyone ever wonder how much food in stores & storage spoils during long power outages?
Does anyone check to see if frozen food that thawed and became tainted was simply refrozen and sold?

When you throw out that stack of frozen TV dinners from your freezer, do you wonder where you can buy some you are sure are not refrozen.

It would be impossible to check the quality of every pill we import from every source.
It would only take a few moments though to spot check a few grocery stores during a power outage.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.