Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Senate Earmark Reforms Quietly Gutted
By Amanda Carpenter
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


A three-word rule change quietly made to Congress’s newly-enacted lobby reform package was recently discovered that significantly reduces disclosure requirements for the earmarks each senator requests.

The new ethics bill, which was signed into law in September, purported to require members of both the House and Senate to make public a signed letter that included the name and address of the intended recipient, or location of any requested earmark.

The final bill, however, contained an exception for members of the Senate. Instead, senators who request earmarks are only required to make public a letter that verifies he or she has “no pecuniary interest” their request.

Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, said he caught the change when he met opposition from Senate Appropriation staff when he tried to obtain the public letters with the earmark information—they weren’t there. Instead, there were only “no pecuniary interest” letters on file. When he protested, he was told the law was being followed.

“So, there was a discrepancy between what the Appropriations committee was saying and what was supposed to be done,” Ellis said in a phone interview. This is what prompted Ellis to investigate.

Ellis later found that the law had been followed, but it wasn’t the law that had been touted to promote transparency in the earmarking process.

The only thing a senator is now required by law to do is to verify he or she has no financial interest in the earmarks he or she seeks. Ellis sarcastically called this an “I’m not a crook” statement.

(Click here to view a House earmark statement and compare it with information listed on a Senate earmark statement.)

Upon making this finding, Ellis published a detailed explanation of the rule change on his website on September 25.

Bill Allison, senior fellow of the Sunlight Foundation, said the change was a “disappointment that no one knew about until the last minute.” His organization utilizes the Internet to make government more transparent and has worked with Taxpayers for Common Sense to publish all earmarks in a free online, searchable database at www.Earmarkwatch.org. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Amanda Carpenter is National Political Reporter for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Amanda Carpenter's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Is it a matter of record
who made the change?

Grumpy: Need we guess?

If we could ever figure out who made the change, my guess is that we'd all just shake our collective heads and say, "Figures!"



Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State: