Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, September 20, 2007
From Little Rock Liberation to Educational Destruction
By Marvin Olasky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are you struggling to keep up with rising gas prices?


Next week brings the 50th anniversary of the desegregation at gunpoint of Central High School in Little Rock, Ark. The U.S. Supreme Court had unanimously struck down in 1954 the concept of "separate but equal" education, and three years later the school became educational desegregation's first major battlefield: Nine black students tried to enter the all-white institution on Sept. 3, 1957, and were turned away.

Looking back now, the end to government-required segregation seems inevitable, but 50 years ago support for it was widespread. Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus helped to orchestrate the mob demonstrations that kept the students from entering the school. To keep the mob at bay President Dwight Eisenhower had to decide whether to send in troops to take action, potentially severe, against American citizens.

Here' s where personal experience becomes important, as Kasey S. Pipes relates in "Ike' s Final Battle: The Road to Little Rock and the Challenge of Equality." Pipes describes Eisenhower's tough decision regarding Little Rock as the culmination of a racial education that began during World War II's Battle of the Bulge. That's when Ike searched for more soldiers and found them among the 300,000 African-American troops who, by War Department policy, were driving trucks and working in the kitchens.

Eisenhower, Pipes told me, "offered them the chance to be trained and sent to the front. Thousands jumped at the chance. Though the Bulge ended before they were ready, they fought in later battles. Ike was impressed with their courage. He never saw race the same way again." And 13 years later, instead of considering blacks fit only for lowly tasks, he thought they should all receive the best education their local school districts could offer.

Eisenhower's religious beliefs also made a difference. He grew up attending church and then drifted away for a while, but as president he often spoke of God in speeches. Pipes: "He famously pushed for the inclusion of the words 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance. In some ways, he saw his journey on race as a journey of redemption. When a black aide confronted him about derogatory comments he had made years earlier about integrating the Army," Eisenhower asked for forgiveness.

But Eisenhower didn't want to set the bad precedent of the federal government poking state governments with bayonet points. He met with Faubus and asked him to use National Guard soldiers under state control to keep back the mobs. Only when Faubus wouldn' t do so did Eisenhower, on Sept. 25, send in the 101st Airborne Division. Democratic Sens. John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson criticized the move, but the 101st set up barriers and patrols, and the crowds eventually went home.

The Little Rock result had a lasting effect. As Pipes says, "Little Rock guaranteed that integration would prevail. No one could doubt that the federal government had the power to enforce it . . . . the greatest impact was on the civil rights movement itself. Little Rock proved that integration would be enforced by the federal government even at the point of a gun. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., though outraged by the mob violence, called Little Rock a 'blessing in disguise.'"

That blessing also brought a curse: the expansion of federal government power that led to the not-so-Great Society of the 1960s and to forced busing that, sadly, led many families to leave urban school systems: The federal government (and some federal judges in particular) went from fostering integration to requiring it, so that what initially enabled free movement soon turned into court-mandated overrides.

Nevertheless, Eisenhower deserves credit for working to advance the American experiment of e pluribus unum, an impossible mission according to most cultures in world history. He also deserves credit for understanding that he was creating a troublesome precedent -- but since man' s expulsion from the Garden of Eden, mixed results have been our lot.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Marvin Olasky is editor-in-chief of the national news magazine World, provost of The King's College, and a professor of journalism at The University of Texas at Austin. For additional commentary by Marvin Olasky throughout the week, go to www.worldontheweb.com.
 
Be the first to read Marvin Olasky's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Getting Right on civil rights
Vic and a couple of other TH readers didn't go far enough. Conservatives who truly understand their principles must be opposed to all integrationist court decisions, laws, and policies. Racial segregation was part of the traditional values and way of life of Americans in a number of states. Real conservatives must defend and support racial segregation.

If conservatives wanted to be true to their principles, they would get all of the civil rights court cases overturned, undo the various civil rights acts, and cease all policies that are intended to promote racial equality. Racial equality is a liberal ideal, not a conservative ideal. Don't forget that the real conservatives in Congress, whether they were Republican or Democrat, opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Republican party in Congress at that time had a left and a moderate center (today these people would be known as RINOs), and Southern Democrats were conservative on race. The Republicans had not yet become a conservative party.

Conservative intellectuals were dead-set against the civil rights movement. Read Buckely, "National Review," and "Human Events" from that era. Those conservatives understood what their ideology required. Too many conservatives today have been drinking liberal PC Koolaid and think they need to support civil rights. No, they don't.

Where my parents live
for another 3 weeks, the local schools were destroyed by the forcible integration. Most of the White kids were put into private academies, and their families moved away from town. The Black kids destroyed the formerly all-white school.

Now the town is about 1200 people, most of the White people are over 70 and nobody is moving in, because there are no schools. As the old people die, their homes are boarded up. Softwood lumber is taking over all the farmland, and it will not be long until the town is a crumbling memory dotted with shacks and trailers.

That is what forcible integration did for that town. I saw that happen with my very eyes.

As for laws being forced on people at gunpoint, they are not. Laws with which people agree are enforced by the community. Laws with which they do not are evaded, ignored and broken. Why do you think there is so much tax evasion, drug sales and use, gambling and prostitution? Why do you think Prohibition was such a massive failure? Why do you think you Limo Liberals cannot bring about the Proletariat Workers Revolution?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.