Here's the matchup we're all looking for in '08: Gore-Clinton vs. Bush-Dole.
Obviously, I'm talking about Al Gore as the Democratic presidential nominee
with Hillary Clinton as his running mate, battling it out with Florida Gov.
Jeb Bush and vice presidential candidate Liddy Dole.
Of course, I'm kidding. If I heard such news, I'd probably shoot my
television. Indeed, the whole country might respond to another round of
Bush, Gore, etc., like those characters in "Airplane!" who commit suicide
whenever Ted Striker (Robert Hays) starts droning on about his life. I
myself would upend a jerrican of gasoline over my head rather than listen to
Gore drone on about lockboxes again. And if Hillary were at the top of the
Democratic ticket, all it would take for me to light the match would be a
giddy "Today" segment on Bill Clinton as the "First Gentleman" - a first
indeed.
Going by my own shamelessly unscientific survey, I think it's fair to say
that people want a clean break from the politics of the last two decades.
Liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats, cats and dogs,
Klingons and Ferengi: Nobody wants to argue about names like Bush, Clinton,
Gore, Kerry, Cheney. Been there, got the snowglobe.
The Republicans have the higher hurdle because Bush fatigue is more acute
than Clinton fatigue these days - owing to the simple fact that Bush is in
office right now (though remember: there's been a Bush or a Dole on every
Republican presidential ticket since 1976).
Exhaustion with the GOP in general is also running high, but the recent
elections may have lanced that boil in time for 2008. If the same flock of
gormless popinjays had stayed in power until the next election, voters would
not only have voted the Republicans out of office, they might well have
voted them into Guantanamo Bay.
Regardless, rumors swirl that Al Gore may run again, if only to prevent
Hillary Clinton from taking what he believes is rightfully his. And John
Kerry, America's most pathetic politician, may throw his chapeau into the
ring again. Try to contain your excitement.
And, of course, there's the Hillary Clinton candidacy, soon to come to you
as the visually oxymoronic bumper sticker "Hillary!" The two most important
things a Hillary candidacy had going for it, from a liberal perspective, now
seem increasingly stale. First, she's a woman and - golly - wouldn't that
just be so exciting! Second, a vote for Hillary would be a vindication of
the Clintons generally. Mean-spirited conservatives picked on those poor
Clintons, so making her president would be a comeuppance for the bad guys
and an attempt to restore the mythic grandeur of Clintonism.
The problem for Hillary is that the shelf life on this stuff is running out.
People may like the idea of returning to what Charles Krauthammer has called
the "holiday from history" that was the 1990s. But nobody wants to return to
the politics of the 1990s - or the 2000s, for that matter. Clinton-worship
and Clinton-hatred alike feel dated, like fights over Richard Nixon.
As for the first-female-president thing, that's still got oomph, but much
less than it did in the 1990s, when such vanity voting was cost-free. After
9/11 and Iraq, voting for a candidate because she's a woman seems just plain
frivolous. Moreover, Hillary Clinton is in the ironic position of no longer
seeming like an affirmative-action candidate. She's more of a person, less
of a category. And the person's baggage crowds out the category's appeal.
My hunch is that average Americans on either side of the ideological divide
recognize their dilemma. Bipartisanship is overrated, but nobody wants day
one of a new presidency to begin at the partisan equivalent of DefCon 1.
America is now in the grip of Mutually Assured Demonization. If the GOP
throws up another Bush (or, perhaps, a Gingrich), "Blue" America will turn
its missile keys. If the Democrats trot out a Gore, a Clinton or a Kerry,
Red America will respond in kind. How else to explain the enormous
popularity of Barack Obama, whose anagram-like name seems to spell "fresh
start" for millions of Americans who know nothing about him?
That's one reason why Florida's Jeb Bush - an outstanding governor - has
decided to spare his country, his party and himself another Bush on the
ticket. Such selflessness is not the Clinton way. It's too soon to tell what
that means for her country, her party or her. |