Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Rebecca Hagelin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Sense in a Senseless Media World
by Rebecca Hagelin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Are Barack Obama's friends -- like Bill Ayers -- legitimate political issues?

 

As usual, the magazine racks in the salon I frequent are filled with rot -- just like those at the doctor’s office, the dentist, and the grocery store check-out display. Publishers obviously think that millions of American women will automatically reach for and read garbage when we’re bored -- which would be insulting if it weren’t true.

Normally I follow my late father’s admonishment to “always carry reading material.” But somehow I’ve found myself empty-handed as I sit here and wait my turn.

As I scan the headlines and teasers on the covers of the two dozen or so publications jammed into racks and scattered on chairs, looking for some hint of intellectual stimulation, I’m greeted with “Sleep in the Nude and Other Ways to Sail Through Menopause,” “The Ultimate Dos and Don’ts of Sex,” and “25 Sex Questions No One’s Ever Asked Men Before.” You’ll excuse me if I’m a bit annoyed by someone I’ve never met boldly trying to tell me about “The Hot List: Everything You’ll Want in 2008.”

We deserve better. That’s why my favorite pro-bono effort is serving as a senior editor of Salvo, a year-old publication (for men and women) that has the guts to actually challenge conventional thinking and offer something more than the sordid details of “Brit’s Torment in Psych Ward.”

Salvo is a quarterly magazine that’s honestly unlike any other publication you’ll ever read. It’s packed with information that might even change the way you look at the world.

That’s a pretty big claim, I know. I’m convinced that if you take the time to order your free sample copy -- at salvomag.com -- you’ll see why it stands out from the status quo.

Salvo’s editors knows they have to work to draw in readers whose attention spans have been shortened by videogames, TV and a nauseating parade of movie stars and porn. The editors appreciate art and design, and successfully use cutting-edge, “in your face” graphics that not only grab your attention, but actually engage both sides of the brain. What a novel approach!

Beyond the style, there’s the core of what makes Salvo truly different -- substance of both word and image that challenges the reader to think critically. Have you ever picked up a magazine that trumpets on its cover an article about a topic of great interest to you, only to find a cursory piece that repeats a lot of lame-brained tripe you’ve read elsewhere? We all have. With Salvo, you really will learn something. And it manages to entertain at the same time. The writers never talk down to readers -- but neither do they alienate them with mind-numbing babble. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rebecca Hagelin, a vice president of The Heritage Foundation is the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture that's Gone Stark Raving Mad and runs the Web site HomeInvasion.org.

Be the first to read Rebecca Hagelin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Idiot's Delight
To make this idiotic argument:

"The main focus of the latest Salvo, however, is Intelligent Design. The editors outline the case for “ID” in detail, showing exactly why more and more scientists are taking a second look at it -and why Darwinian Evolutionary Theory is on the ropes."

is exactly an example of:

"Publishers obviously think that millions of American women will automatically reach for and read garbage when we’re bored -- which would be insulting if it weren’t true."



Evolution and ID
Evolution, as used by scientists, refers to the theory of Evolution as proposed by Darwin and then evolved by scientists since that time.

It is possible to have theories of evolution other than the one that comes to us via Darwin (in fact at the time of Darwin there was another contender that had animals evolving during their lifetime under pressure from their surroundings) but there is so little challenge currently to Darwin's version that people in science feel free to talk about evolution, meaning the theory from Darwin, without risk of confusion.

Whether evolution and Intelligent Design are compatible depends on what one takes those theories to consist of. Evolution is certainly compatible with the existence of a God who chose the initial conditions under which evolution occurred. But the theory of Intelligent Design as proposed by people like Dembski argues that the world shows evidence of features that could not have come about purely through evolution, which is clearly at odds with the theory of evolution (although not with all of the features of evolution that are anethema to creationists).

I suppose Dembski's version of the argument which is based in abstract probablistic reasoning (it is just so unlikely that the right initial conditions existed so there must have been a God) could be consistent with everything essential to the theory of evolution.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.