Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Rebecca Hagelin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Preserving "Liberty's Best Hope"
by Rebecca Hagelin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who should John McCain pick as his running mate?














 

Listening to more than a few liberals, you’d think that the biggest problem in the world today is the United States. The “blame America first” crowd also foolishly wants us to give up our sovereignty, our security and our heritage. It’s nauseating.

Liberty’s Best Hope,” a new book by Kim Holmes, vice president for foreign policy at The Heritage Foundation, boldly proclaims the truth: The United States and our republican democracy is the only true hope for the oppressed nations in the world. If we don’t step up to the plate and accept the responsibility that comes with the many blessings we enjoy as a free nation, then our future -- and indeed that of peace-loving people around the world -- is bleak, at best.

To fully understand where America fits into the “global community,” it’s helpful to hear from an experienced observer and statesman such as Holmes. A former Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs, he has directed The Heritage Foundation’s foreign policy research for nearly two decades. From the need for comprehensive missile defense to protect our nation and our allies, to the sorry state of the United Nations, to warning of dangerous, rogue regimes that pose a real threat around the world, Holmes addresses the vital issues of our day with the voice of authority.

As Holmes explains, a fundamental question should frame the debate over all U.S. foreign policy, including our role in Afghanistan, Iraq and the wider War on Terrorism: What’s the purpose of American leadership? Is it merely to remain the big kid on the global block, as our detractors -- both at home and abroad -- would have us believe? As Holmes boldly proclaims, the overriding mission of American leadership must be the defense and promotion of liberty.

It’s part and parcel of our character. The United States, in the words of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, “is the most reliable force for freedom in the world, because the entrenched values of freedom are what make sense of its whole existence.” If we fail to lead, we fail the cause of liberty.

The title of Holmes’ book comes partly from Thomas Jefferson’s first inaugural address, where our third president called our form of government the “world’s best hope.” Why? Because it’s designed to preserve and protect freedom.

Imbued with this mission, we need to take a clear-eyed look at home and abroad to decide what needs to be done to keep the United States strong and the cause of liberty alive. Here “Liberty’s Best Hope” proves particularly valuable. Holmes takes us on a tour of the world’s hot spots and leading actors -- one you’ll never get just watching the evening news. Consider his unflinching take on Russia and China: Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rebecca Hagelin, a vice president of The Heritage Foundation is the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture that's Gone Stark Raving Mad and runs the Web site HomeInvasion.org.

Be the first to read Rebecca Hagelin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Oh, and
I'd put very little store in what's on his website. It's bound to have things that are non-controversial (like pressing people to reconcile their differences. duh), stuff that no one would take issue with -- sorta like the "bipartisan" legislation he offers as a proof of what a uniter he is. Look for the dem congress to help their nominee by only tackling non-controversial legislation between now and Nov. Funny enough, there are alot of things most people agree about.
But when it comes to the tough stuff, he'll no uniter be, as his views are the furthest from center of anyone. He has the advantage of having done so little that he can say pretty much what he wants. But there are anough dots for you to get the idea.

Taft
You would do very well to look into his UN views, as you have suggested you will. I think you'll be rather alarmed.
You can start with his proposal that the US start giving a % of our GDP to the UN (cost in next few years about 850 billion) as a global tax. There's more--you're smart, you'll connect the dots.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.