Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, January 24, 2008
William Rusher :: Townhall.com Columnist
Good News From Taiwan
by William Rusher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who will win on November 4th?


The voters of Taiwan have just handed their friends and well-wishers in the United States a gratifying victory in their nation's parliamentary elections. It hasn't received much notice in the press here, but it deserves to be noted for the triumph it is.

Taiwan, which has been an independent nation since the communists seized China during World War II, was dominated from its inception in 1945 until 2000 by the Nationalist Party, or Kuomintang. The Nationalists have never made any secret that their ambition is to reunite the island with mainland China when the latter has been purged of communism and is a free country again. Their chief opponent is the Democratic Progressive Party, which elected Chen Shui-bian as president of Taiwan in 2000 and has since tended increasingly to favor Taiwan's independence -- not only from Communist China, but from any successor government of China, however free.

This tendency has naturally infuriated Beijing, which, of course, prefers the Nationalists' policy of eventual reunion with the mainland, albeit a non-Communist mainland. More important, it squarely conflicts with American policy, which agrees with the Nationalists in favoring Taiwan's ultimate reunion with the mainland after the communists there have been overthrown. To Washington, President Chen's policy of cautiously increasing Taiwan's separation from China simply aggravates Beijing to no purpose, since Taiwan is for all practical purposes entirely independent of the People's Republic of China and has our assurances that we will make sure, by military means if necessary, that it remains so.

Nevertheless, President Chen, seeking to benefit politically by encouraging separatist tendencies in Taiwan, has pursued a policy of increasing the political distance between Taipei and Beijing. At the moment, for example, he is sponsoring a referendum, to be held in conjunction with the island's forthcoming presidential election on March 22, that would make it national policy to seek to join the United Nations under the name "Taiwan" rather than its formal name, which is "the Republic of China." Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has described this as a "provocative policy," which it surely is.

The Kuomintang, of course, bitterly opposes Chen's proposal. And that is why it is extremely noteworthy that, in the nationwide parliamentary elections just held, the voters of Taiwan gave a landslide victory to the Kuomintang, handing it nearly three-quarters of the seats in Parliament.

This drubbing foreshadows disaster for Chen's DPP in the elections of March 22, which will vote both on Chen's successor as president and on the referendum. Recognizing the disaster that has already occurred as well as the one to come, Chen (whose second and final term as president is expiring) has resigned as party chairman to take responsibility for the defeat. The DPP's candidate to succeed him, Frank Hsieh, is expected to play down the issue. But if the Kuomintang defeats Hsieh and the referendum, and elects its candidate, Ma Ying-jeou, as Taiwan's new president, the United States will have a loyal and dependable friend in that key position.

The biggest winners, however, will be the people of Taiwan. They will continue to enjoy their de facto independence and the island's famous prosperity, without unnecessarily insulting their large and dangerous neighbor across the Strait of Formosa. And they will continue to have an indispensable friend and ally in the United States of America.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

William Rusher is a Distinguished Fellow of the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy and author of How to Win Arguments .

Be the first to read William Rusher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: The status quo of Taiwan (III)

What's the responsibility of US?

The unclassified documents from US Nation Archive shows that US planed to occupied Taiwan themself after Japan was surrendered in 1945. However, just couples days before US luanched the occupation plan Chiang Kai-shek asked US to let him take over Taiwan. He needed the resource of Taiwan to help him. US agreed about that and the nightmare of people of Taiwan was begun.

The historical documents also show that US had warned Chiang Kai-shek not to flee to Taiwan and asked Philipine to help Chiang Kai-shek instead. But US lost their ground finally and helped Chiang Kai-shek and his troops fled to Taiwan.

Us has been played two hands policy to get benefit for themself by blurring the status and future of Taiwan.

Taiwan translated toward democracy when DPP was formed. More and more people of Taiwan understand the whole story. When people of Taiwan want to join UN through referendum, it's a pity to find that US stands on the opposite side.

US claimed themself as a democractic conuntry but they always stands on the dictators side in Taiwan history. No matter what the politicians said, US has to understand that people in Taiwan don't trust US anymore because the "Justice" character and image of US is gone.

BTW, I'll recommend the book "Formosa Betrayed" to underand Taiwan's situation during the critical years. George H. Kerr, the author of the book, was in Taiwan during that time, serving as vice consul at the U.S. consulat. You can read the online edition: http://www.romanization.com/books/formosabetrayed/index.ht ml

And yes, it's easy to tell that I'm not native spearker, I'm a formosan.

The status quo of Taiwan (II)

So, what's the status quo of Taiwan?

In San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan gave up sovereignty over Taiwan, but it was not determined who was the beneficiary: it was concluded that "...the future status of Taiwan will be decided in accord with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations."

The Charter of the UN contains article 1.2 which states that it is a purpose of the UN "To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples..." The formal result of the San Francisco Peace Treaty is thus that the people of Taiwan should determine the future status of the island based on the principle of self-determination. This Treaty is thus the first, and the last, international treaty of the 20th Century which deals with the status of Taiwan.

However, people of Taiwan lived under Martial Law for about 40 years since 1947, while the KMT attempted to maintain the fantasy that they ruled all of China, and would some day "recover" the mainland. People in Taiwan were forced by KMT to join the civil war of China. KMT keep Taiwan from democracy and Taiwan was actually controlled by a dictator, there's no way for people of Taiwan to self-determine the future of the islands.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.