Chaos Erupts As Pro-Israel and Pro-Hamas Groups Clash Violently at UCLA
America Is Tipping Over
NYPD Enters Columbia University to Clear Out Pro-Hamas Occupiers
'Make Government Work'
WaPo's Sympathy for an Attacker
Some on the Right Are Having a Moral Meltdown
The 'Biden Bump' That Didn't Last Long
The White House Correspondents Host a Biden Rally
No, Demonstrations Today Not Like the 1960s
Blinken Meets With Genocide Perpetrator
Trusting China in Inviting Another Pandemic
Journalism Is Not a Crime, Even When It Offends the Government
Trump-Haters Hit a Brick Wall at SCOTUS
Performative Outrage
Biden White House Considers Bringing Palestinians to United States As 'Refugees'
OPINION

The case for engaged justices

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
"The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the Constitution is written." - Marbury v. Madison (1803) Debates about judicial review concern the propriety and scope of judicial supervision of democracy and involve the countermajoritarian dilemma: How to square the principle of popular sovereignty with the practice of allowing appointed judges, accountable to no contemporary constituency, to overturn laws enacted by elected legislators? A case destined for the Supreme Court concerns the health-care law. The Constitution establishes a government of limited and enumerated powers. Which one empowers Congress to force individuals to purchase health insurance and to punish those who do not?
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos