Here's What's Going to Happen to the Pro-Hamas Students at Columbia This Afternoon
Don't Shoot Your Dog
Watch a Reporter Whiff on Who's at Fault for the Surge of Antisemitism...
Columbia Professor: These Pro-Hamas Rallies 'Are Not Justice'
The Latest Joe Biden Poll Is Devastating
Gavin Newsom Asked the Public for Help Designing New $1 Coin and the...
'Progressivism': The Modern Zeitgeist
Noem Issues Statement Responding to Criticism for Shooting Her Dog
Bartiromo Asks Jordan a Question on Every Conservative's Mind
McConnell Identifies the One Person He Claims Is Responsible for Leading the Charge...
Terrorists on Campus
Presidential Candidate Arrested at Pro-Hamas Protest
Here’s What Mitch McConnell Said About a National Ban on Abortion
Proof That Young Americans Vote Pro-Life
CNN's New 2024 Poll Just Ruined CNN's Weekend
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Announces Decision on Idaho's Ban on 'Gender Affirming Care' for Kids

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

On Monday, the United States Supreme Court allowed Idaho to enforce a ban on so-called “gender affirming care” for minors. This encompasses puberty blockers, hormone therapy treatments, and sex reassignment surgery. 

Advertisement

According to The New York Times, three liberal Supreme Court justices, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Justice Elena Kagan, objected to allowing the ban to be enforced. 

The law, passed by the state legislature and signed into law by Republican Gov. Brad Little, makes it a felony for doctors to provide this kind of experimental, irreversible transgender “care” for children. Many states, including Indiana and Louisiana, have similar laws. 

Reportedly, the ban would apply to everyone except for the plaintiffs who brought the challeng (via NYT):

Notably, the opinions focused not on transgender care, a hot-button political issue that has prompted several Republican-led legislatures to approve bills to restrict puberty-blocking drugs and hormone treatments, but on a broader legal question: universal injunctions.

Universal injunctions are when a single judge issues a sweeping decision that applies beyond those directly involved in the dispute. Some justices have signaled an interest in looking at the tactic.

Although orders in response to emergency applications often include no reasoning, the justices in this case divided into several factions.

Advertisement

Predictably, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), representing the plaintiffs in the case, said the outcome was “an awful result for transgender youth and their families across the state.”

“Today’s ruling allows the state to shut down the care that thousands of families rely on while sowing further confusion and disruption,” the left-wing organization said in a statement.

Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador celebrated the ruling. 

“Denying the basic truth that boys and girls are biologically different hurts our kids,” Mr. Labrador said. “No one has the right to harm children, and I’m grateful that we, as the state, have the power — and duty — to protect them.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement