Garland to Be Held in Contempt. This is Why.
Is This Why Kristi Noem Is Reportedly Poking Local Tribal Leaders?
White House Insists on a 'Political' Solution to Deal With Hamas Terrorists
Libs Want Townhall Charged Under 'Genocide Convention' for Reporting the Truth About Israe...
Ignoring a Blood Libel Hoax, Jen Psaki Misinforms on Misinformation, and Ignoring Stormy's...
Gold Star Families Blast Jen Psaki's Lies: 'Her Useless A** Wasn't Even There'
Could New York and New Jersey Really be in Play for Trump?
Dems in Disarray Over Bill to Force Biden to Release Hold on Ammunition...
Nancy Pelosi Back to Denigrating Fellow Americans With Claims About 'Guns, Gays, and...
Even CNN Is Alarmed by Biden's Latest Poll Numbers
'No Respectable Normal Political Party' in U.S.: Ted Cruz Slams Democrats for Abandoning...
Here’s How Pro-Hamas Columbia Students Protested at Their Graduation
As Expanded War Looms, a Subdued Israel Marks Memorial Day
J.K. Rowling Received Backlash for Saying This About a ‘Trans’ Person
Dem Strategist Warns: Biden Is in Serious Trouble Because He Keeps Alienating Swing...
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Picks Particularly Progressive Candidate Mandela Barnes to Face Ron Johnson in November

John Hart/Wisconsin State Journal via AP, File

On Tuesday night, among the several states picking their nominees, Wisconsin chose Mandela Barnes, a particularly progressive candidate who is currently the state's lieutenant governor, to face Sen. Ron Johnson, the Republican incumbent, in November.

Advertisement

Barnes' win was not a surprise, considering many other Democratic candidates had dropped out to endorse him shortly before the race. Decision Desk HQ ultimately declared him the winner at 9:14pm EST, minutes after the polls closed. That race was even called before Sen. Johnson's primary was. 

With an estimated 95 percent of the vote in, Barnes ran away with the primary, earning 78.03 percent of the vote. The next closest candidate, Alex Lasry, came in with only 8.79 percent of the vote. 

Barnes' victory led to a headline from POLITICO's Holly Otterbein first thing on Wednesday morning, when it comes to "Democrats betting on progressives to keep control of Senate." Also mentioned in the piece is John Fetterman, running to fill the open Senate seat left behind by Sen. Pat Toomey, a retiring Republican. He similarly won his race quite easily back in May, despite experiencing a stroke not long before the primary, and will face Dr. Mehmet Oz in November. 

As the piece mentions:

The rise of Barnes and Fetterman is an opportunity for the left wing of the party, which has often struggled to flip swing seats and instead found success in ousting Democratic incumbents in deep-blue areas. Both men have said they would be the 51st vote to pass ambitious liberal legislation that has been stymied by centrist Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), and both say they support eliminating the filibuster and passing a national law to make abortion legal.

“When they’re victorious, it will have such a huge impact for so many reasons,” said Maurice Mitchell, national director of the progressive Working Families Party. “Every week it becomes more and more plausible that the Democrats maintain governing majorities in both houses, and might even expand the governing majority in the Senate. That will mean that we get another bite at the apple of governing. It means that we will no longer be subject to the Sinema or the Manchin veto.”

Republicans, meanwhile, see the ascension of Barnes and Fetterman as an opening to pick off independent and suburban voters. During their primaries, many GOP operatives thought they were likely to be less formidable general election candidates than their more moderate opponents.

“Democrats nominated the most liberal candidates they could find in states that are struggling because of Joe Biden and the Democrats’ agenda that’s resulted in record gas prices, skyrocketing inflation, crime raging, and a border crisis,” said Chris Hartline, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. “We look forward to watching Mandela Barnes defend his embrace of defunding law enforcement and John Fetterman defend his support for banning fracking.”

Pennsylvania is widely considered to be the best chance for Democrats to flip a seat in the evenly divided Senate, while Sen. Ron Johnson in Wisconsin, Barnes’ opponent, is viewed as the most vulnerable Republican incumbent in the chamber.

Advertisement

It's worth mentioning that Decision Desk HQ last month ranked Sen. Johnson's race as "Solid Republican," as they tend to place heavy emphasis on the power of the incumbency. 

While Cook Political Report regards the seat as a "Toss-Up," Sabato's Crystal Ball has it as "Lean Republican" and Inside Elections says it's a "Tilt Republican" race.

Otterbein also points to Democrats who are worried that progressives will alienate voters in the general:

The fact that Democrats are rallying behind Barnes and Fetterman represents a departure from past election cycles, when they typically selected centrist candidates to be their standard bearers in battleground Senate races. That has worried some moderates in the Democratic Party who believe the candidates have baggage that could alienate swing voters.

When Barnes touted Sanders’ endorsement last month, Matt Bennett, a co-founder of the center-left group Third Way, tweeted, “Why would you do this? WHY???”

In an interview, Bennett said that Barnes is “a very appealing candidate in many, many ways for both wings of the party. He’s dynamic and smart and young and he could be great. But we were nervous — we are nervous — that some of the things he’s done and said are going to make it tough to win in a swing state like Wisconsin.”

Advertisement

FiveThirtyEight currently considers Democrats to be "slightly favored" to win the Senate, though Republicans remain favored to take control back of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement