Is This Why Hillary Clinton's Play Is Failing?
Argentina's Javier Milei Is Proving the Leftists Wrong With Latest Economic News
Kansas City Chiefs Kicker Roasts Biden Over His 'Delusional' Stance on This Issue
Red Lobster's Plan to Save Itself Ended Up Destroying It
Trump Is Winning, for Now
Censorship: A Global Pandemic
Trump Faces Troubles, but Biden Campaign Is Dead in the Water
Jimmy Carter's Grandson Provides a Health Update on the Former President
Hillary Clinton's Conspiracy Privilege
Identity Politics Explained
Joe Biden, Political Pinwheel
Shafik and Other College Presidents Have Mission Confusion
The 'Heart' of Alvin Bragg's Case Against Trump Is Misdirection
Biden Blunders by Suing Iowa Over Immigration
Kerry Syndrome
Tipsheet

Justice Gorsuch Lays Waste to the Biden Administration's Argument for J6 Prison Sentences

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the Fischer v. United States case, which related to whether the DC Court of Appeals “erred in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512 obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence,” according to SCOTUSblog. This criminal statute was slapped against hundreds of January 6 defendants, many serving years behind bars. 

Advertisement

During oral arguments, Justice Neil Gorsuch poked holes in the Biden Justice Department’s case, listing four instances of “obstructing a Congressional proceeding,” mentioning Rep. Jamaal Bowman’s (D-NY) fire alarm stunt last year:

The best part is when the Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said they would need evidence of intent in these circumstances. 

“Oh, they intend to do it alright,” replied Gorsuch. 

In March, a federal appeals court ruled that up to 100 January 6 defendants might have had their jail sentences improperly enhanced.

Advertisement

A lot of liberals weren't pleased with this line of questioning. Cope and seethe:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement